ABSTRACT
AIM: Comparing the effects of Albumin 5% versus Ringer's lactate on blood loss and coagulation after vascular surgery using. METHODS: In this randomised study, 60 patients, aged (18-60 years) ASA physical status (I-III) undergoing vascular surgery were included in the study and randomly allocated into two groups using a random number generator, to receive either Human albumin or Ringer lactate after obtaining written informed consent. Group A received 1-2 ml per minute of human albumin 5% combined with normal saline (0.9%). Group B received Ringer's lactate only as of the main solution. Variables were measured after administration of fluids as postoperative measures. The amount of blood needed for testing was 4 ml drawn before the operation and at the end of surgery with a citrate tube (blue tube) from the venous line or using a regular needle. The standard time of 15 minutes was considered to begin processing. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference observed between both groups regarding demographic data, surgical wound drainage, haemoglobin level, hematocrit level and coagulation profile. Regarding ROTEM thermoelectrometry variables showed that there was no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups In-TEM variables (Ex-TEM Clotting time, TEM Clot Formation Time) but In-TEM Alpha Angel measured in degrees showed a Statistically significant difference between the two groups. P < 0.001 and Ex-TEM Maximum Clotting Firmness MCF values measured in mm, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups P = 0.045. CONCLUSION: This study concluded that the use of human albumin (5%) in vascular surgeries before reaching the trigger point for blood transfusion didn't improve blood loss or coagulation profile compared to the use of ringer lactate only. Therefore, ringer lactate can be used as a good replacement for human albumin. Ringer lactate is readily available and inexpensive while human albumin may be costly.
