ABSTRACT
Introduction: The opiate dosage adequacy scale (ODAS) is one of the most common assessment tools in studies on substance use disorders, which evaluates the "adequacy" of opiate medication doses in individuals recruited in maintenance approaches. There is no investigation on the Persian version of this questionnaire in Iran. This research validated a Persian version of the ODAS. Methods: The Persian version of the ODAS was translated and revised based on the original scale presented by González-Saiz et al. The psychometric characteristics of the ODAS were assessed via direct interviews. Three trained interviewers questioned 250 patients treated in methadone maintenance clinics in Mazandaran Province (Northern Iran) for more than three months. Internal consistency and factor analysis were conducted using SPSS software, version 24. Results: The internal consistency of ODAS was satisfactory (Cronbach's α=0.81). Across all items, considerable inter-rater reliability was discovered (kappa values between 0.90 and 1). A four-component structure was produced by the factor analysis that accounted for 77.5% of the total variance. Cronbach's α coefficients of the four components of Heroin craving and overmedication, Consumption, objective opiate withdrawal symptoms, and subjective opiate withdrawal symptoms were 0.84, 0.91, 0.83, and 0.74, respectively. Conclusion: The reliability and validity of the Persian version of the ODAS were satisfactory in a sample of methadone maintenance subjects. Highlights: The opiate dosage adequacy scale (ODAS) is a clinical tool for measuring the adequacy of methadone dosesThe Persian version of ODAS has good validity, internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability;The Persian version of the ODAS, as a valid and reliable tool, can be used for the Iranian people under methadone maintenance. Plain Language Summary: In Iran, opioids are among the most common forms of illicit drugs. In opioid maintenance programs, the adequacy of methadone doses has an important effect on treatment outcomes. Clinicians typically assess the adequacy of doses based on the patient's response to the medication. Different tools are used in clinical studies to evaluate it. One of these tools is the ODAS, developed by González-Saiz et al. In the present study, we validated the Persian version of the ODAS for Iranian patients receiving methadone maintenance programs. The results confirmed the four-factor structure of the Persian ODAS and showed its good internal consistency and inter-rater reliability.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: For the first time in Iran, and to the best of our knowledge in Asia, we assessed the anthropometric indices most closely correlated to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in a large nationally representative sample of children and adolescents to be used as a simple tool for identifying those at risk. METHODS: This multi-center study was performed among a representative sample of 4811 school students (2248 boys and 2563 girls) aged 6-18 years, as part of the baseline survey of a national surveillance system. Anthropometric indices and CVD risk factors were measured using standard protocols, and their correlation was analyzed by using Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves and partial correlation. RESULTS: The most prevalent CVD risk factors were low HDL-C (28%), followed by hypertriglyceridemia (20.1%), and overweight (17%). The ROC analyses showed that among boys, all anthropometric indices had the same association with CVD risk factors in 6-9.9-year-age group, while in the 10-13.9 and 14-18-year-age groups, respectively waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI) were the best in distinguishing CVD risk factors. Among girls, these indices were respectively BMI and waist to stature ratio (WSR); WC and WSR; and WC. In the partial correlation analysis, in boys, the highest coefficient was found for BMI; BMI and WC; and for WC and WSR; in girls, these indices were BMI; WC and WSR; and BMI respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, BMI, WC and WSR were the most appropriate in predicting CVD risk factors. It may be clinically useful in the pediatric population to routinely measure WC and WSR in addition to BMI as a screening tool to identify high-risk youth.
