ABSTRACT
Purpose: This study aims to assess the combination of anterior lamellar recession (ALR) with blepharoplasty, suprasternal fixation, and internal eyelash bulb extirpation of aberrant lashes posteriorly located in patients with any grade of upper eyelid trachomatous cicatricial entropion. Patients and Methods: We reviewed the clinical data of eighty-six patients (143 eyelids) including age, gender, systemic medical illnesses, and comprehensive ophthalmological assessment. Eyelid evaluation was recorded, including laterality, previous surgical technique used, possible trichiasis etiology, abnormality of the lid margin, tarsal plate consistency (shrinkage or loosening), skin fold overhanging, laxity of the pretarsal skin, margin reflex distance 1 (MRD1), lagophthalmos, and lid retraction. The success rate was assessed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperative. Results: The success rate was 97.2% in the third month, which decreased significantly to 92.3% in the 6th month and 90.2% in the 9th month (P = 0.01, and 0.001 respectively). In the 9th month, we had fourteen failed cases. All of them were submitted for a second intervention. Three underwent electrolysis, four cases underwent re-internal bulb extirpation, four cases underwent the same procedure, and three cases underwent epilation. The success of the failed cases after the second intervention was significantly associated with the type of reintervention (P = 0.03), in which all of them succeed except two cases that underwent epilation. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the mean recurrence time in our study was 6.8 months (95% CI = 5.8-7.7 months). Conclusion: This study showed the combination of ALR with blepharoplasty, suprasternal fixation, and cauterization or internal bulb extirpation of posteriorly located lashes procedure resulted in a high success rate in patients with any form of UCE with no increase in incidence or degree of lagophthalmos associated with UCE.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: During dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), the lacrimal sac wall biopsy is not routinely performed in our hospital, but it is recommended if there is a suspicion of underlying disease other than preoperatively or intraoperatively chronic inflammation. OBJECTIVE: Most of patients with epiphora have different causes of nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). This study aims to examine how important routine lacrimal sac biopsy is during endoscopic DCR surgery. PATIENTS & METHODS: The study included 50 patients with chronic unilateral epiphora. All patients underwent endoscopic DCR with NLD biopsy. Histopathologic analysis was performed for each specimen. RESULTS: The findings of NLD biopsy showed chronic inflammation in 33 cases (66%), chronic dacryocystitis in 9 cases (18%), dacryolith with dacryocystitis in one case, granuloma in 4 cases (8%), rhinoscleroma in 2 cases (4%), and one case had a neoplasm. Histopathologic findings were inflammatory cellular infiltrates in 56%, 30% and 14% in mild, moderate and severe chronic inflammatory state (CIS) score, respectively. Fibrosis in 18%, 20% and 62% in mild, moderate and severe CIS score, respectively. Capillary proliferation in 64%, 32% and 4% in mild, moderate and severe CIS score, respectively. Chronic inflammatory signs in 64%, 32% and 4% in mild, moderate and severe CIS score, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although neoplasm and granuloma are rare cause of lacrimal sac or duct obstruction requiring DCR, they were detected through nasolacrimal assessment and routine intraoperative lacrimal sac biopsy.
