Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 62: 195-205, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31449941

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In some cases of complex aortoiliac endovascular repair, the hypogastric landing zone is suboptimal or even insufficient. This study aimed at the technical feasibility and at the outcome of iliac branch device (IBD) deployment with extension of the IBD into the superior gluteal artery (SGA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involves a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained single-center cohort of patients with implantation of IBD for aortoiliac and postdissection aneurysms. The IBD cohort with landing zones in the hypogastric main trunk (IIA IBD) was compared with the IBD cohort with landing zones in the SGA (SGA IBD). The main outcome parameters were primary technical success, patency of the hypogastric branch, and freedom from IBD-specific secondary interventions within 30 days. Other outcomes of interest were long-term patency and freedom from buttock claudication, as well as the incidence of endoleaks. Group comparisons were made by univariate significance tests, and freedom from reintervention was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier-method. RESULTS: From January 2015 to October 2017, a total of 46 IBDs were implanted in 40 patients (39 male; mean age, 71.9 ± 9.1 years). Nineteen of 46 (41.3%) IBDs were extended with at least one bridging stent graft into the SGA because of aneurysmal or short internal iliac artery (IIA). Technical success was achieved in 97.8% (96.3% for IIA IBD vs. 100% for SGA IBD, P = 0.163), and the primary ipsilateral limb patency rate was 100% within 30 days after the procedure. During a mean follow-up period of 19.8 ± 10.0 months (24.7 ± 10.8 for IIA IBD vs. 25.1 ± 9.8 for SGA IBD, P = 0.461), 11.1% IBDs in the IIA IBD group and 15.8% IBDs in the SGA IBD group needed secondary interventions (P = 0.33). Follow-up revealed no patients suffering from persistent buttock claudication or erectile dysfunction. One patient in the SGA IBD group died at late follow-up from a non-aneurysm-related cause. CONCLUSIONS: Extension of IBD into the SGA is a technically feasible and safe maneuver in the treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms with outcomes comparable to those when IBDs extend to the main trunk of the hypogastric artery.


Subject(s)
Aortic Dissection/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Buttocks/blood supply , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Iliac Aneurysm/surgery , Iliac Artery/surgery , Stents , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Dissection/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Dissection/physiopathology , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Endoleak/etiology , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Feasibility Studies , Female , Germany , Humans , Iliac Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Iliac Aneurysm/physiopathology , Iliac Artery/diagnostic imaging , Iliac Artery/physiopathology , Intermittent Claudication/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Design , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Patency
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...