Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Exp Biol ; 222(Pt 19)2019 10 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31527181

ABSTRACT

Animals socially interact during foraging and share information about the quality and location of food sources. The mechanisms of social information transfer during foraging have been mostly studied at the behavioral level, and its underlying neural mechanisms are largely unknown. Fruit flies have become a model for studying the neural bases of social information transfer, because they provide a large genetic toolbox to monitor and manipulate neuronal activity, and they show a rich repertoire of social behaviors. Fruit flies aggregate, they use social information for choosing a suitable mating partner and oviposition site, and they show better aversive learning when in groups. However, the effects of social interactions on associative odor-food learning have not yet been investigated. Here, we present an automated learning and memory assay for walking flies that allows the study of the effect of group size on social interactions and on the formation and expression of associative odor-food memories. We found that both inter-fly attraction and the duration of odor-food memory expression increase with group size. This study opens up opportunities to investigate how social interactions during foraging are relayed in the neural circuitry of learning and memory expression.


Subject(s)
Biological Assay/methods , Drosophila melanogaster/physiology , Feeding Behavior/physiology , Memory/physiology , Odorants , Social Behavior , Animals , Automation , Conditioning, Classical/drug effects , Conditioning, Classical/physiology , Drosophila melanogaster/drug effects , Feeding Behavior/drug effects , Memory/drug effects , Sucrose/pharmacology
2.
iScience ; 13: 113-124, 2019 Mar 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30826726

ABSTRACT

Odorants of behaviorally relevant objects (e.g., food sources) intermingle with those from other sources. Therefore to determine whether an odor source is good or bad-without actually visiting it-animals first need to segregate the odorants from different sources. To do so, animals could use temporal stimulus cues, because odorants from one source exhibit correlated fluctuations, whereas odorants from different sources are less correlated. However, the behaviorally relevant timescales of temporal stimulus cues for odor source segregation remain unclear. Using behavioral experiments with free-flying flies, we show that (1) odorant onset asynchrony increases flies' attraction to a mixture of two odorants with opposing innate or learned valence and (2) attraction does not increase when the attractive odorant arrives first. These data suggest that flies can use stimulus onset asynchrony for odor source segregation and imply temporally precise neural mechanisms for encoding odors and for segregating them into distinct objects.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...