Housing in Delaware for the Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Population.

Individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) encounter numerous barriers in attempting to access housing. Those barriers - financial, physical, and cultural in nature - have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 public health emergency and the related, or co-occurring, shifts that have characterized the housing market in the United States, and Delaware specifically, over these last three years. In this brief introductory research report, we examine the system of housing supports and their availability to individuals with IDD through a subset of those served by the state's Division of Developmental Disabilities Services through interviews with representatives across the housing support system. Our findings fall into four areas of work: scale and scope; housing availability; housing assistance; and housing supports. We find that: the estimated scale of the housing crisis (in terms of homelessness and insecurity) affecting this population is much greater than the general population, but in line with other national estimates for individuals with IDD; there is limited available housing that is accessible to individuals with IDD available in the state; there is limited assistance available for navigating the housing that might be available; and that there are too few options for providing more supports for individuals living, or trying to live, independently. We conclude with a few suggested recommendations that could provide more reliable data and tracking of need and a call for research that connects housing for individuals with IDD into the growing body of research looking at the relationship between access to housing and health.

Environmental Exposure Disparities and Neurodevelopmental Risk: a Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Neurotoxicant exposures are of particular concern in historically marginalized communities. Often a consequence of structural racism, low-income minoritized populations experience a disproportionate burden of hazardous exposures through proximity to industrial facilities, high traffic roads, and suboptimal housing. Here, we summarize reports on exposures and neurodevelopment focused on differences by education, income, race/ethnicity, or immigration status from 2015 to 2022, discuss the importance of such investigations in overburdened communities, and recommend areas for future research. RECENT FINDINGS: We found 20 studies that investigated exposure disparities and neurodevelopment in children. Most were conducted in the USA, and many focused on air pollution, followed by metal exposures and water contamination. Although several studies showed differences in exposure-outcome associations by income and education, many examining differences by race/ethnicity did not report notable disparities between groups. However, measures of individual race and ethnicity are not reliable measures of discrimination experienced as a consequence of structural racism. Our review supports scientific evidence that the reduction of individual and widespread municipal exposures will improve child development and overall public health. Identified research gaps include the use of better indicators of economic status and structural racism, evaluations of effect modification and attributable fraction of outcomes by these factors, and considerations of multidimensional neighborhood factors that could be protective against environmental insults. Considering that vulnerable populations have disparities in access to and quality of care, greater burden of exposure, and fewer resources to incur associated expenses, such populations should be prioritized.

Accommodating Developmental Disabilities in the Social Determinants of Health:: A Brief Inquiry into the Applicability of Metrics to the Lives of Individuals with Developmental Disabilities in Delaware.

This commentary outlines the methods and findings of a preliminary study examining the fitness of the Social Determinants of Health in their current conceptualizations for accommodating the specific and general experiences of individuals with developmental disabilities and suggests recommendations for both additional research and policy interventions. The study is based on research conducted with individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities living in Delaware and other stakeholders working in this community. There is currently extensive literature concerning the validity and importance of including the social determinants of health in healthcare decision-making, but very little research exists around the intersection of developmental disabilities and these determinants. This commentary provides additional detail and added emphasis to calls previously made in this Journal to align social determinants with developmental disabilities and the importance of considering the SDOH in policy measures aimed at supporting this population. The ultimate aim of the work presented here is to explore how the State's interest in putting the SDOH to work generally can be aligned to accommodate the needs and interests of individuals with I/DD and to identify future research and policy interventions in support of these efforts.