Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Perioper Pract ; 34(6): 199-203, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38343376

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing major gastrointestinal (GI) surgery including hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeries have large incisions, which cause severe acute postoperative pain that, if untreated, is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative morbidity and delayed recovery. METHODOLOGY: Our study included all patients who underwent elective major upper GI and HPB surgeries from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2018. The patients were divided into two groups: the epidural and the non-epidural group. The average and worst pain scores at rest and movement were compared between both groups. We also studied the effect of pain relief in the two groups and associated postoperative outcomes, resumption of feeding, ambulation, hospital stay and intensive care unit stay. RESULTS: A total of 566 patients were included in the study, out of which 490 received epidurals, and the rest, 76, belonged to the non-epidural group (transversus abdominis plane, rectus sheath block or no regional analgesia technique). The median average pain score at rest and movement was 2.0 and 3.0, respectively, in the epidural and non-epidural groups. The postoperative outcomes showed no statistical difference. CONCLUSION: The epidural group and the non-epidural group had similar pain scores, and the postoperative outcomes were also comparable.


Subject(s)
Pain Management , Pain, Postoperative , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Management/methods , Aged , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Analgesia, Epidural/adverse effects , Pain Measurement , Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...