Telemonitoring in subjects with newly diagnosed heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: From clinical research to everyday practice.

INTRODUCTION: Heart failure is increasingly common, and characterised by frequent admissions to hospital. To try and reduce the risk of hospitalisation, techniques such as telemonitoring (TM) may have a role. We wanted to determine if TM in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure and ejection fraction <40% reduces the risk of readmission or death from any cause in a 'real-world' setting. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 124 patients (78.2% male; 68.6 ± 12.6 years) who underwent TM and 345 patients (68.5% male; 70.2 ± 10.7 years) who underwent the usual care (UC). The TM group were assessed daily by body weight, blood pressure and heart rate using electronic devices with automatic transfer of data to an online database. Follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: Death from any cause occurred in 8.1% of the TM group and 19% of the UC group ( p = 0.002). There was no difference between the two groups in all-cause hospitalisation, either in the number of subjects hospitalised ( p = 0.7) or in the number of admissions per patient ( p = 0.6). There was no difference in the number of heart-failure-related readmissions per person between the two groups ( p = 0.5), but the number of days in hospital per person was higher in the UC group ( p = 0.03). Also, there were a significantly greater number of days alive and out of hospital for the patients in the TM group compared with the UC group ( p = 0.0001). DISCUSSION: TM is associated with lower any-cause mortality and also has the potential to reduce the number of days lost to hospitalisation and death.

Optimal medical therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina: why patients should 'be taking' and 'keep taking' the tablets.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Cardioprotective drug regimens improve outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Revascularization is recommended for the persistence of symptoms despite optimal medical therapy (OMT) or in patients likely to derive prognostic benefit. Our objective is to comment on recent evidence that initiation of OMT is suboptimal in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) but conversely adherence to medication may be higher in patients treated with PCI. COMMENT: Large randomized controlled trials demonstrate that the risk of death or myocardial infarction is similar in patients treated by OMT alone and those treated with PCI and OMT. Despite the recommendations of international practice guidelines, OMT remains underutilized in recent analyses of patients referred for PCI. Notwithstanding the underutilization of proven therapies, a recent study suggests that adherence to medication is significantly higher in patients treated with PCI than in those treated with OMT alone. We discuss the potential factors that may contribute to underprescription of OMT and predict adherence in patients undergoing PCI. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Contemporary studies continue to demonstrate underutilization of OMT in patients referred for PCI but increased medication adherence in patients treated by PCI. We argue for increased recognition of OMT as the definitive treatment for stable angina, so that we can be sure those patients who require PCI 'are taking' and 'keep taking' the tablets.