Engagement strategies adopted by the nursing information officer team in preparing nurses for the implementation of an integrated electronic health record.

This article explores the critical role the nursing information officer (NIO)'s team played in facilitating the transition to an electronic health record system (EHR) at two NHS trusts in London. The article highlights that with the increasing importance of digital leadership in nursing, it is necessary to prepare nursing staff for the implementation of an EHR to enhance patient care and staff experience. It discusses various methodologies the NIO's team adopted, including 'show and tells', demos, walkabouts, induction sessions, 'CopyCat' charting, and a 'change and engagement' document. These engagement strategies are aimed at addressing diverse learning needs, increasing nurses' confidence and ensuring effective use of the new EHR. The successful implementation of an EHR depends on collaborative efforts among nursing staff, leadership and NIO teams. This emphasises the importance of embracing digital transformation and innovative strategies in navigating healthcare technology complexities.

Development and evaluation of an electronic medical device training passport to identify nurses' training needs.

BACKGROUND: All nurses, particularly those working in critical care settings, are required to use medical devices when providing patient care. However, inconsistent practice and variations in documentation can make it challenging for nurses and nurse managers to identify what medical device training is required and when. AIM: To develop and evaluate the use of an electronic medical device training passport to identify the training needs of nurses in intensive care units (ICUs). METHOD: A pilot study was conducted in a multi-unit critical care department in London, England, to determine if the passport could make it easier to identify ICU nurses' medical device training needs compared with existing practice. Nine participants were first asked to identify their needs using existing spreadsheets or paper records, then asked to identify them using the passport. The participants were also interviewed to identify their training requirements before and after using the passport. The data were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. FINDINGS: The electronic passport significantly improved identification of medical device training needs compared with paperwork or spreadsheets for all device groups, except for medical devices used on high dependency units ( P ≤0.005). However, there may be issues related to nurses' behaviours and expectations, particularly that staff do not always recognise their need for training. CONCLUSION: The findings of this pilot study suggest that the use of an electronic medical device training passport has many benefits and could make it easier to identify ICU nurses' training needs in clinical practice.