Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Comp Eff Res ; 11(14): 1045-1055, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35899700

ABSTRACT

Aim: To estimate the costs and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) recipients based on the use of mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry (MCOT) monitoring. Materials & methods: A retrospective database study was conducted to estimate costs, contribution margins (CMs), pacemaker insertions and other outcomes for patients undergoing TAVR procedures with MCOT monitoring post-procedure versus non-MCOT monitoring. Results: A total of 4164 patients were identified (283 MCOT monitoring and 3881 non-MCOT monitoring). The rate of pacemaker insertion following hospital discharge was higher in the MCOT cohort (6.6 MCOT vs 2.1% non-MCOT; p = 0.007). MCOT use was associated with lower costs and improved CMs of the index TAVR admission (costs: US$40,569 MCOT vs $43,289 non-MCOT; p = 0.003; CMs: US$7087 MCOT vs $5177 non-MCOT; p = 0.047) with no difference through the subsequent 60-day period following discharge. Conclusion: MCOT for ambulatory cardiac monitoring post-TAVR discharge is associated with higher rates of pacemaker insertion, at no overall greater costs.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Humans , Outpatients , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Telemetry , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Comp Eff Res ; 11(4): 251-261, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34905953

ABSTRACT

Aim: This study estimates the costs and outcomes pre- versus post-implementation of an early deterioration detection solution (EDDS), which assists in identifying patients at risk of clinical decline. Materials & methods: A retrospective database analysis was conducted to assess average costs per discharge, length of stay (LOS), complications, in-hospital mortality and 30-day all-cause re-admissions pre- versus post-implementation of an EDDS. Results: Average costs per discharge were significantly reduced by 18% (US$16,201 vs $13,304; p = 0.007). Average LOS was also significantly reduced (6 vs 5 days; p = 0.033), driven by a reduction in general care LOS of 1 day (p = 0.042). Complications, in-hospital mortality and 30-day all-cause re-admissions were similar. Conclusion: Costs and LOS were lower after implementation of an EDDS for general care patients.


Early deterioration detection solutions (EDDS) assist in identifying patients at risk of clinical decline to enable a timely response. This study estimates the costs and outcomes before and after implementation of an EDDS at a US hospital for general care patients. Results show average costs per discharge and average length of stay were significantly reduced after implementation. Complications, in-hospital mortality and 30-day all-cause re-admissions were similar in the two time periods.


Subject(s)
Hospitals , Patient Discharge , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay , Retrospective Studies
3.
Med Devices (Auckl) ; 14: 445-458, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34955658

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare costs and outcomes of mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry (MCOT) patch followed by implantable loop recorder (ILR) compared to ILR alone in cryptogenic stroke patients from the US health-care payors' perspective. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A quantitative decision tree cost-minimization simulation model was developed. Eligible patients were 18 years of age or older and were diagnosed with having a cryptogenic stroke, without previously documented atrial fibrillation (AF). All patients were assigned first to one then to the alternative monitoring strategies. Following AF detection, patients were initiated on oral anticoagulants (OAC). The model assessed direct costs for one year attributed to MCOT patch followed by ILR or ILR alone using a monitoring duration of 30 days post-cryptogenic stroke. RESULTS: In the base case modeling, the MCOT patch arm detected 4.6 more patients with AFs compared to the ILR alone arm in a cohort of 1000 patients (209 vs 45 patients with detected AFs, respectively). Using MCOT patch followed by ILR in half of the patients initially undiagnosed with AF leads to significant cost savings of US$4,083,214 compared to ILR alone in a cohort of 1000 patients. Cost per patient with detected AF was significantly lower in the MCOT patch arm $29,598 vs $228,507 in the ILR only arm. CONCLUSION: An initial strategy of 30-day electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring with MCOT patch in diagnosis of AF in cryptogenic stroke patients realizes significant cost-savings compared to proceeding directly to ILR only. Almost 8 times lower costs were achieved with improved detection rates and reduction of secondary stroke risk due to new anticoagulant use in subjects with MCOT patch detected AF. These results strengthen emerging recommendations for prolonged ECG monitoring in secondary stroke prevention.

4.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 30(2): 203-211.e4, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30717951

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare reinterventions and associated costs to maintain arteriovenous graft hemodialysis access circuits after rescue with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), with or without concurrent Viabahn stent grafts, over 24 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter (n = 30 sites) study evaluated reintervention number, type, and cost in 269 patients randomized to undergo placement of stent grafts or PTA alone. Outcomes were 24-month average cumulative number of reinterventions, associated costs, and total costs for all patients and in 4 groups based on index treatment and clinical presentation (thrombosed or dysfunctional). RESULTS: Over 24 months, the patients in the stent graft arm had a 27% significant reduction in the average number of reinterventions within the circuit compared to the PTA arm (3.7 stent graft vs 5.1 PTA; P = .005) and similar total costs ($27,483 vs $28,664; P = .49). In thrombosed grafts, stent grafts significantly reduced the number of reinterventions (3.7 stent graft vs 6.2 PTA; P = .022) and had significantly lower total costs compared to the PTA arm ($30,329 vs $37,206; P = .027). In dysfunctional grafts, no statistical difference was observed in the number of reinterventions or total costs (3.7 stent graft vs 4.4 PTA; P = .12, and $25,421 stent graft and $22,610 PTA; P = .14). CONCLUSIONS: Over 24 months, the use of stent grafts significantly reduced the number of reinterventions for all patients, driven by patients presenting with thrombosed grafts. Compared to PTA, stent grafts reduced overall treatment costs for patients presenting with thrombosed grafts and had similar costs for stenotic grafts.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon , Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Graft Occlusion, Vascular/surgery , Renal Dialysis , Stents , Thrombosis/surgery , Angioplasty, Balloon/adverse effects , Angioplasty, Balloon/economics , Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical/economics , Blood Vessel Prosthesis/economics , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/economics , Cost Savings , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Graft Occlusion, Vascular/economics , Graft Occlusion, Vascular/etiology , Graft Occlusion, Vascular/physiopathology , Health Care Costs , Humans , Prospective Studies , Renal Dialysis/economics , Reoperation , Risk Factors , Stents/economics , Thrombosis/economics , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...