Heart donation and transplantation after circulatory determination of death: expert guidance from a Canadian consensus building process.

Controlled donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD), where death is determined after cardiac arrest, has been responsible for the largest quantitative increase in Canadian organ donation and transplants, but not for heart transplants. Innovative international advances in DCD heart transplantation include direct procurement and perfusion (DPP) and normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). After death is determined, DPP involves removal and reanimation of the arrested heart on an ex situ organ perfusion system. Normothermic regional perfusion involves surgically interrupting (ligating the aortic arch vessels) brain blood flow after death determination, followed by restarting the heart and circulation in situ using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The objectives of this Canadian consensus building process by a multidisciplinary group of Canadian stakeholders were to review current evidence and international DCD heart experience, comparatively evaluate international protocols with existing Canadian medical, legal, and ethical practices, and to discuss implementation barriers. Review of current evidence and international experience of DCD heart donation (DPP and NRP) determined that DCD heart donation could be used to provide opportunities for more heart transplants in Canada, saving additional lives. Although candid discussion identified a number of potential barriers and challenges for implementing DCD heart donation in Canada, it was determined that DPP implementation is feasible (pending regulatory approval for the use of an ex situ perfusion device in humans) and in alignment with current medical guidelines for DCD. Nevertheless, further work is required to evaluate the consistency of NRP with current Canadian death determination policy and to ensure the absence of brain perfusion during this process.

RéSUMé: Le don contrôlé après un décès circulatoire (DDC), cas dans lequel le décès est déterminé après un arrêt cardiaque, est à l'origine de la plus forte augmentation quantitative des dons et des transplantations d'organes au Canada, sauf pour les transplantations cardiaques. Parmi les progrès internationaux novateurs dans la transplantation cardiaque après DDC, citons l'obtention directe et perfusion (ODP) et la circulation régionale normothermique (CRN). Une fois le décès déterminé, l'ODP consiste à retirer et réanimer le cœur arrêté sur un système de perfusion ex situ. La circulation régionale normothermique consiste à interrompre de manière chirurgicale (en ligaturant les vaisseaux de l'arc aortique) le flux sanguin au cerveau après la détermination du décès, puis à redémarrer le cœur et la circulation in situ utilisant l'oxygénation par membrane extracorporelle (ECMO). Les objectifs de ce processus canadien d'établissement de consensus par un groupe multidisciplinaire d'intervenants canadiens étaient d'examiner les données probantes et les expériences internationales actuelles en matière de DDC, d'évaluer comparativement les protocoles internationaux par rapport aux pratiques médicales, juridiques et éthiques canadiennes existantes, et de discuter des obstacles à la mise en œuvre de tels protocoles. L'examen des données probantes et des expériences internationales actuelles en matière de don de cœur après DDC (ODP et CRN) a permis de déterminer que le don de cœur après DDC pourrait être utilisé afin de faire de plus nombreuses transplantations cardiaques au Canada, sauvant ainsi des vies supplémentaires. Bien que des discussions aient permis d'identifier plusieurs obstacles et défis potentiels à la mise en œuvre du don cardiaque après DDC au Canada, il a été déterminé que la mise en œuvre de l'ODP est réalisable (en attente de l'approbation réglementaire pour l'utilisation d'un dispositif de perfusion ex situ chez l'humain) et en accord avec les directives médicales actuelles concernant le DDC. Néanmoins, d'autres travaux sont nécessaires pour évaluer la conformité de la CRN aux politiques canadiennes actuelles de détermination de la mort et pour garantir l'absence de perfusion cérébrale au cours de ce processus.

Improving quality of withdrawal of life-sustaining measures in organ donation: a framework and implementation toolkit.

BACKGROUND: Donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD) is responsible for the largest increase in deceased donation over the past decade. When the Canadian DCD guideline was published in 2006, it included recommendations to create standard policies and procedures for withdrawal of life-sustaining measures (WLSM) as well as quality assurance frameworks for this practice. In 2016, the Canadian Critical Care Society produced a guideline for WLSM that requires modifications to facilitate implementation when DCD is part of the end-of-life care plan. METHODS: A pan-Canadian multidisciplinary collaborative was convened to examine the existing guideline framework and to create tools to put the existing guideline into practice in centres that practice DCD. RESULTS: A set of guiding principles for implementation of the guideline in DCD practice were produced using an iterative, consensus-based approach followed by development of four implementation tools and three quality assurance and audit tools. CONCLUSIONS: The tools developed will aid DCD centres in fulsomely adapting the Canadian Critical Care Society Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Measures guideline.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE : Au cours des dix dernières années, le don d'organe après un décès cardiocirculatoire (DDC) a été à l'origine de la plus importante augmentation de dons provenant d'individus décédés. Les lignes directrices canadiennes sur le DDC, publiées en 2006, recommandaient la création de politiques et de procédures standard pour l'interruption des traitements de maintien des fonctions vitales (TMFV) ainsi que celle de cadres d'assurance de la qualité pour cette pratique. En 2016, la Société canadienne de soins intensifs a publié des recommandations concernant les TMFV; ces recommandations nécessitent des modifications pour pouvoir être facilement mises en œuvre lorsque le DDC fait partie du plan de soins de fin de vie. MéTHODE : Un groupe collaboratif multidisciplinaire pancanadien s'est réuni afin d'examiner le cadre établi par les lignes directrices existantes et créer des outils pour mettre en œuvre ces recommandations dans les centres pratiquant le DDC. RéSULTATS : En utilisant une approche itérative et consensuelle, un ensemble de principes directeurs a été créé pour mettre en œuvre des directives concernant la pratique du DDC : quatre outils d'implantation et trois outils d'assurance de la qualité et d'audit ont été mis au point. CONCLUSION : Les outils créés aideront les centres de DDC à adapter de manière plus complète les Lignes directrices pour l'interruption des traitements de maintien des fonctions vitales de la Société canadienne de soins intensifs.

Survey of Canadian critical care physicians' knowledge and attitudes towards legislative aspects of the deceased organ donation system.

PURPOSE: We surveyed Canadian critical care physicians who may care for patients who are potential organ donors to understand their attitudes and knowledge of legislation governing the deceased organ donation system. METHODS: We used a web-based, self-administered survey that included questions related to opt-out consent and mandatory referral legislation. Potential participants were identified through membership lists of professional societies and manual searches. We designed our survey using standardized methods and administered it in February and March 2018. RESULTS: Fifty percent (263/529) of potential participants completed the questionnaire. A majority (61%; 144/235) supported a change towards an opt-out consent model, and 77% (181/235) stated they believe it would increase donation rates. Asked if opt-out consent would change their practices, 71% (166/235) stated an opt-out model would not change how or if they approach families to discuss donation. Fifty-six percent (139/249) supported mandatory referral laws, while only 42% (93/219) of those working in provinces with mandatory referral correctly stated that such laws exist in their province. Respondents gave variable responses on who should be accountable when patients are not referred, and 16% (40/249) believed no one should be held accountable. CONCLUSIONS: While a majority of critical care physicians supported opt-out consent and mandatory referral, many were neutral or against it. Many were unaware of existing laws and had variable opinions on how to ensure accountability. Efforts to increase understanding of how legislative models influence practice are required for any law to achieve its desired effect.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Nous avons étudié les intensivistes canadiens qui prennent soin de patients potentiellement donneurs d'organes afin de comprendre leurs attitudes et connaissances quant aux lois régissant le système de don d'organes de donneurs décédés. MéTHODE: Nous avons utilisé un sondage électronique auto-administré incluant des questions liées au consentement implicite avec option de retrait et à la législation de référence obligatoire. Les participants potentiels ont été identifiés grâce aux listes des sociétés professionnelles et par des recherches manuelles. Nous avons conçu notre sondage à l'aide de méthodes standardisées et l'avons administré en février et mars 2018. RéSULTATS: Cinquante pour cent (263/529) des participants potentiels ont complété le questionnaire. La majorité (61 %; 144/235) était en faveur d'un changement vers un modèle de consentement avec option de retrait, et 77 % (181/235) ont déclaré penser que cela augmenterait les taux de don. Lorsqu'il leur a été demandé si l'option de consentement avec option de retrait modifierait leur pratique, 71 % (166/235) ont affirmé qu'un modèle avec possibilité de retrait ne modifierait pas leur façon ou leur intention d'approcher les familles pour parler de don d'organes. Cinquante-six pour cent (139/249) étaient en faveur de lois concernant la référence obligatoire, alors que seulement 42 % (93/219) des intensivistes travaillant dans des provinces où la référence était obligatoire ont correctement déclaré que de telles lois existaient dans leur province. Les répondants ont donné des réponses variables quant à l'imputabilité lors de la non-référence des patient, et 16 % (40/249) étaient d'avis que personne ne devrait être tenu responsable. CONCLUSION: Alors que la majorité des intensivistes était en faveur du consentement avec option de retrait et de la référence obligatoire, bon nombre n'avaient pas d'avis sur la question ou étaient contre. De nombreux intensivistes ne connaissaient pas bien les lois existantes et avaient des opinions variables sur la façon de garantir l'imputabilité. Des efforts sont nécessaires pour augmenter la compréhension de la manière dont les modèles législatifs influencent la pratique afin qu'une loi, quelle qu'elle soit, ait l'effet désiré.

Survey of Canadian intensivists on physician non-referral and family override of deceased organ donation.

PURPOSE: Intensive care physicians play an important role in the identification and referral of potential organ donors in Canada. Nevertheless, little is known about intensivists' attitudes or behaviours in situations where families override previously expressed consent to donate; nor why physicians elect not to refer patients who are potential donors to provincial organ donation organizations (physician non-referral). METHODS: We integrated questions regarding family override and physician non-referral into an online, self-administered survey of Canadian intensivists. We report results descriptively. RESULTS: Fifty percent of targeted respondents (n = 550) participated. Fifty-five percent reported having witnessed family override situations and 44% reported having personally not referred patients who were potential donors. Fifty-six percent of respondents stated they would not pursue donation in the face of family override; 2% stated they would continue with the donation process. Fear of loss of trust in the donation system (81%) and obligation to respect the grief and desires of surrogate decision makers (71%) were frequently reported reasons to respect family override requests. Respondents who chose not to refer patients often did so based on organ dysfunction they assumed would preclude donation (59%), or a perception that the family was too distressed to consider donation (42%). No respondents reported that personally held beliefs against organ donation influenced their decision. CONCLUSION: Physicians caring for patients who are potential organ donors commonly encounter both family override and physician non-referral situations. Knowledge translation of optimal practices in identification and referral could help ensure that physician practices align with legal requirements and practice recommendations.

Development of national system performance metrics for tissue donation, production, and distribution activity.

Canada's federal, provincial, and territorial governments gave Canadian Blood Services a mandate for organ and tissue donation and transplantation, including system performance, data and analytics. In 2012 Canadian Blood Services facilitated an eye and tissue banking workshop focused on standardized specifications and practices. At the workshop, the Canadian tissue community directed Canadian Blood Services to facilitate the development and implementation of a national data stream and analytics. Prior to this no national data was prospectively collected or collated on tissue donation, production or distribution activity. An eye and tissue data committee was formed with representation from eye and tissue banks in all Canadian jurisdictions. A minimum data set, standardized definitions, a data submission form and a quality assurance process was developed. Training was provided to data personal identified by each eye and tissue bank. Data collection was initiated January 1, 2013; with quarterly data submitted to Canadian Blood Services via excel spreadsheet. Data was submitted by sixteen Canadian eye and tissue banks, located in eight of Canada's thirteen provinces and territories, representing a census of activity. Annual data reports, with trend analysis, are generated and distributed to the tissue community to inform operational strategy and system performance improvement. This report provides an overview of the data process and provides visibility to the Canadian tissue donation, production and distribution activities for 3 years; January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015.

Supply of human allograft tissue in Canada.

There is relatively little known about the supply for allograft tissues in Canada. The major aim of this study is to quantify the current or "Known Supply" of human allograft tissue (bone, tendons, soft tissue, cardiovascular, ocular and skin) from known tissue banks in Canada, to estimate the "Unknown Supply" of human allograft tissue available to Canadian users from other sources, and to investigate the nature and source of these tissue products. Two surveys were developed; one for tissue banks processing one or more tissue types and the other specific to eye banks. Thirty nine sites were initially identified as potential tissue bank respondent sites. Of the 39 sites, 29 sites indicated that they were interested in participating or would consider completing the survey. A survey package and a self-addressed courier envelope were couriered to each of 29 sites. A three week response time was indicated. The project consultants conducted telephone and email follow-up for incomplete data. Unknown supply was estimated by 5 methods. Twenty-eight of 29 sites (97%) completed and returned surveys. Over the past year, respondents reported a total of 5,691 donors (1,550 living and 4,141 cadaveric donors). Including cancellous ground bone, there were 10,729 tissue products produced by the respondent banks. Of these, 71% were produced by accredited banks and 32% were ocular tissues. Total predicted shortfall of allograft tissues was 31,860-66,481 grafts. Through estimating Current supply, and compiling additional qualitative information, this study has provided a snapshot of the current Canadian supply and shortfall of allograft tissue grafts.

Demand for human allograft tissue in Canada.

There is relatively little known about the demand for allograft tissues in Canada. The Canadian Council for Donation and Transplantation (CCDT) is a national advisory body that undertook a comprehensive "market survey" to estimate surgical demand for human allograft tissues in Canada. The report "Demand for Human Allograft Tissue in Canada" reflects survey results sent to 5 prominent User Groups. User Groups were identified as orthopaedic surgeons; neurosurgeons; corneal transplant surgeons; plastic surgeons, specifically those at Canadian Burn Units; and cardiac surgeons (adult and paediatric surgery). The demand for allograft grafts was determined and then extrapolated across the total User Group and then increases in allograft tissue use over the next 1-2 years across User Groups were predicted. The overall response rate for the survey was 21.4%. It varied from a low of 19.6% for the orthopaedic survey to a high of 40.5% for the corneal survey. The estimated current demand for allograft tissue in Canada ranges from a low of 34,442 grafts per year to a high of 62,098 grafts per year. The predicted increase in use of allograft tissue over the next 1-2 year period would suggest that annual demand could rise to somewhere in the range of 42,589-72,210 grafts. The highest rated preferences (98% and 94%) were for accredited and Canadian tissue banks, respectively. This study represents a key step in addressing the paucity of information concerning the demand for allograft tissue in Canada.