Remaining Issues Related to Serum Cytokines in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated by Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Combination Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AteBev) combination treatment is widely used as first-line systemic therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). We aimed to clarify therapeutic issues regarding serum cytokines and the immune reaction in patients with uHCC treated with AteBev. METHODS: We analyzed preserved serum from a previous prospective study on adult Japanese patients with chronic liver disease and uHCC who received AteBev treatment at our hospital. In that study, AteBev were administered intravenously every 3 weeks, and blood samples were collected before and after 3 weeks' treatment. Dynamic computed tomography was performed after 6 weeks of treatment to assess response. RESULTS: In the prospective study, 21 of the 59 patients showed partial response (PR) and 19 patients showed stable disease (SD), but 19 patients showed progressive disease (PD). We found that serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin (IL)-6, and soluble IL-2 receptor (IL-2R) increased significantly in the PR group, but only soluble IL-2R increased significantly in the PD group. Regulatory T cells decreased significantly in the PD group, but there was no significant change in Th1 or Th2 cells from before to after treatment in any group. As regards soluble MHC-class I, pre-treatment levels were significantly lower in the PD group than in the PR group, and serum levels increased significantly with treatment in the PD group. CONCLUSION: These findings reveal a need to further improve T-cell priming and to further make T-cells recognize tumor antigens in uHCC.

Effects of Lenvatinib on Skeletal Muscle Volume and Cardiac Function in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Previously, we reported that the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sorafenib decreases serum levels of carnitine and reduces skeletal muscle volume. Moreover, others reported that TKIs might lead to cardiomyopathy or heart failure. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of lenvatinib (LEN) on skeletal muscle volume and cardiac function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: This retrospective study included 58 adult Japanese patients with chronic liver diseases and HCC treated with LEN. Blood samples were collected before and after 4 weeks of treatment, and serum carnitine fraction and myostatin levels were measured. Before and after 4-6 weeks of treatment, the skeletal muscle index (SMI) was evaluated from computed tomography images and cardiac function was assessed by ultrasound cardiography. RESULTS: After treatment, SMI, serum levels of total carnitine, and global longitudinal strain were significantly lower, but serum levels of myostatin were significantly higher. Left ventricular ejection fraction showed no significant change. CONCLUSION: In patients with HCC, LEN decreases serum levels of carnitine, skeletal muscle volume, and worsens cardiac function.

Lenvatinib Might Induce Activation of Host Immunity in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Atezolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, plus bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is an approved first-line systemic treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors are more effective in patients with HCC when administered with anti-VEGF drugs; however, these drugs affect host immunity. Lenvatinib is an anti-VEGF agent used to treat HCC; therefore, this study evaluated the effect of treatment of HCC with lenvatinib on host immunity in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). METHODS: We studied adult Japanese patients with CLD and unresectable HCC treated with lenvatinib at our hospital. Lenvatinib was administered for 4 weeks (8 mg/day for bodyweight <60 kg; 12 mg/day for bodyweight >60 kg). Blood samples were collected at baseline and at 4 weeks of treatment and examined for immune-related changes. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled in this study. We found a significant increase in T helper (Th) 1 cells following 4 weeks of lenvatinib treatment, although there was no significant difference in Th2 cells and regulatory T cells. We also found a significant increase in serum levels of TNF-alpha, soluble TNF-alpha receptor I, and endothelial growth factor following 4 weeks of lenvatinib treatment. Furthermore, an increase in Th1 cells and serum levels of TNF-alpha was found in patients with partial response. CONCLUSION: Lenvatinib might induce Th1-dominant host immunity in patients with CLD and unresectable HCC treatment in patients who showed a partial response. These changes in host immunity may be a biomarker in HCC patients treated with lenvatinib.

Adaptation of lenvatinib treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombosis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to clarify the adaptation of lenvatinib treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). METHOD: Fifty-three patients with HCC were treated with lenvatinib. Before and after treatment blood sampling, patients were examined by computed tomography and ultrasonography. In patients with portal trunk invasion (Vp4), the analysis focused on the degree of occlusion due to the tumor in the portal trunk. In patients without major PVTT {ie, invasion of the primary branch of the portal vein [Vp3] or Vp4}, portal blood flow volume was measured by Doppler analysis; however, Doppler analysis is difficult to perform in patients with major PVTT, so the time from administration of the contrast agent to when it reached the primary branch of the portal vein (portal vein arrival time) was evaluated with the contrast agent Sonazoid. RESULTS: Patients with Vp4 had a significantly worse prognosis than patients with Vp3 and a significant increase in Child-Pugh score at 2 months. Patients with major PVTT had a poor prognosis if the degree of occlusion of the portal trunk was 70% or more. In patients without major PVTT, portal blood flow was significantly decreased after administration of lenvatinib; and in patients with major PVTT, the hepatic artery and portal vein arrival times were significantly increased. CONCLUSION: Lenvatinib treatment should be avoided in patients with Vp4 with a high degree of portal trunk occlusion because of concerns about decreased portal blood flow.