ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare efficacy and safety of visual internal urethrotomy (VIU) using holmium laser (Ho:YAG) (group A) versus cold knife (group B) in children with urethral strictures. It may be the first comparative study on this issue in children. METHODS: This study compared Ho:YAG group, which was evaluated prospectively from January 2014 till January 2016, versus cold knife group, which was a historical control performed from March 2008 till February 2010. Children ≤ 13 years old with urethral strictures ≤ 1.5 cm were included successively. Recurrent cases, congenital obstructions and cases with complete arrest of dye in voiding cystourethrography were excluded. Scar tissue was incised at twelve o'clock. Outcome was compared using Student's t, Mann-Whitney, Chi-square or Fisher exact tests as appropriate. RESULTS: Each group included 21 patients. Mean age was 6.27 ± 3.23 (2-13) years old. Mean stricture length was 1.02 versus 1 cm in group A versus B, respectively (p = 0.862). Ten cases of penile/bulbous strictures and another 11 cases of membranous strictures were found in each group. There was no significant difference between both groups in preoperative data. Success rate for initial VIU was 66.7% in group A versus 38% in group B (p = 0.064). This was associated with significantly higher Qmax in group A (mean 16.52 vs 12.09 ml/s; p = 0.03). Success rate after two trials of VIU was 76.2% for group A and 47.61% for group B (p = 0.057). No complications were reported in both groups. CONCLUSION: Laser VIU has a higher success rate than cold knife VIU for urethral strictures ≤ 1.5 cm in children with significantly higher Qmax. Both are easy to perform, low invasive and safe.
Subject(s)
Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Urethral Stricture/surgery , Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/methods , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/adverse effects , Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/instrumentationABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We challenge the requirement for routine placement of a nephrostomy tube after percutaneous renal surgery, assessing the outcome, safety, and efficacy of tubeless procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 128 patients underwent tubeless percutaneous renal surgery from May 2001 to May 2004: stone extraction in 120 patients and endopyelotomy +/- stone extraction in 8. The stone sizes ranged from 2 to 7 cm with a mean of 4.1 cm. An external ureteral catheter was used in 120 patients and was removed after 24 hours if a retrograde study revealed no extravasation. An antegrade Double-J stent was used in 8 patients and removed 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively. Among the 128 patients treated by the tubeless technique, we met situations that mandated insertion of a nephrostomy tube in 18. RESULTS: The stone free-rate was 90.4%. The mean hospital stay was 1.7 days. The incidence of significant intraoperative bleeding was 1.5% and that of significant postoperative hematuria was 4.6%. Postoperative sonography revealed a small perirenal collection (<50 mL) in 10 patients (7.8%) and significant perirenal collections (100-250 mL) in 3 (2.3%). The postoperative retrograde study revealed minor extravasation in 14 patients (12%) and significant extravasation in 3 (2.3%) CONCLUSION: Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery with an externalized ureteral catheter is a safe procedure that is suitable for any patient who can be rendered stone free with a single procedure regardless of the initial stone burden.
