Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sensors (Basel) ; 21(13)2021 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34282759

ABSTRACT

This paper focuses on the binary classification of the emotion of fear, based on the physiological data and subjective responses stored in the DEAP dataset. We performed a mapping between the discrete and dimensional emotional information considering the participants' ratings and extracted a substantial set of 40 types of features from the physiological data, which represented the input to various machine learning algorithms-Decision Trees, k-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machine and artificial networks-accompanied by dimensionality reduction, feature selection and the tuning of the most relevant hyperparameters, boosting classification accuracy. The methodology we approached included tackling different situations, such as resolving the problem of having an imbalanced dataset through data augmentation, reducing overfitting, computing various metrics in order to obtain the most reliable classification scores and applying the Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations method for interpretation and for explaining predictions in a human-understandable manner. The results show that fear can be predicted very well (accuracies ranging from 91.7% using Gradient Boosting Trees to 93.5% using dimensionality reduction and Support Vector Machine) by extracting the most relevant features from the physiological data and by searching for the best parameters which maximize the machine learning algorithms' classification scores.


Subject(s)
Machine Learning , Support Vector Machine , Algorithms , Cluster Analysis , Fear , Humans
2.
Sensors (Basel) ; 20(24)2020 Dec 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33322014

ABSTRACT

This paper proposes a protocol for the acquisition and processing of biophysical signals in virtual reality applications, particularly in phobia therapy experiments. This protocol aims to ensure that the measurement and processing phases are performed effectively, to obtain clean data that can be used to estimate the users' anxiety levels. The protocol has been designed after analyzing the experimental data of seven subjects who have been exposed to heights in a virtual reality environment. The subjects' level of anxiety has been estimated based on the real-time evaluation of a nonlinear function that has as parameters various features extracted from the biophysical signals. The highest classification accuracy was obtained using a combination of seven heart rate and electrodermal activity features in the time domain and frequency domain.


Subject(s)
Phobic Disorders , Virtual Reality , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Heart Rate , Humans , User-Computer Interface
3.
Sensors (Basel) ; 20(2)2020 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31952289

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we investigate various machine learning classifiers used in our Virtual Reality (VR) system for treating acrophobia. The system automatically estimates fear level based on multimodal sensory data and a self-reported emotion assessment. There are two modalities of expressing fear ratings: the 2-choice scale, where 0 represents relaxation and 1 stands for fear; and the 4-choice scale, with the following correspondence: 0-relaxation, 1-low fear, 2-medium fear and 3-high fear. A set of features was extracted from the sensory signals using various metrics that quantify brain (electroencephalogram-EEG) and physiological linear and non-linear dynamics (Heart Rate-HR and Galvanic Skin Response-GSR). The novelty consists in the automatic adaptation of exposure scenario according to the subject's affective state. We acquired data from acrophobic subjects who had undergone an in vivo pre-therapy exposure session, followed by a Virtual Reality therapy and an in vivo evaluation procedure. Various machine and deep learning classifiers were implemented and tested, with and without feature selection, in both a user-dependent and user-independent fashion. The results showed a very high cross-validation accuracy on the training set and good test accuracies, ranging from 42.5% to 89.5%. The most important features of fear level classification were GSR, HR and the values of the EEG in the beta frequency range. For determining the next exposure scenario, a dominant role was played by the target fear level, a parameter computed by taking into account the patient's estimated fear level.


Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Fear/classification , Phobic Disorders , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Adult , Anxiety , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted , Electroencephalography , Galvanic Skin Response/physiology , Heart Rate/physiology , Humans , Phobic Disorders/diagnosis , Phobic Disorders/physiopathology , Phobic Disorders/therapy , Young Adult
4.
Sensors (Basel) ; 19(7)2019 Apr 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30978980

ABSTRACT

There has been steady progress in the field of affective computing over the last two decades that has integrated artificial intelligence techniques in the construction of computational models of emotion. Having, as a purpose, the development of a system for treating phobias that would automatically determine fear levels and adapt exposure intensity based on the user's current affective state, we propose a comparative study between various machine and deep learning techniques (four deep neural network models, a stochastic configuration network, Support Vector Machine, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Random Forest and k-Nearest Neighbors), with and without feature selection, for recognizing and classifying fear levels based on the electroencephalogram (EEG) and peripheral data from the DEAP (Database for Emotion Analysis using Physiological signals) database. Fear was considered an emotion eliciting low valence, high arousal and low dominance. By dividing the ratings of valence/arousal/dominance emotion dimensions, we propose two paradigms for fear level estimation-the two-level (0-no fear and 1-fear) and the four-level (0-no fear, 1-low fear, 2-medium fear, 3-high fear) paradigms. Although all the methods provide good classification accuracies, the highest F scores have been obtained using the Random Forest Classifier-89.96% and 85.33% for the two-level and four-level fear evaluation modality.


Subject(s)
Biophysical Phenomena/physiology , Electroencephalography , Emotions/physiology , Fear/physiology , Adult , Fear/classification , Female , Humans , Machine Learning , Male , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL