ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that noise exposure can accelerate hearing decline after the noise exposure has ceased. We aimed to assess long-term hearing decline in persons with and without prior occupational noise exposure. METHODS: We conducted a population-based longitudinal study in Norway using the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) from 1996 to 1998 (baseline) and from 2017 to 2019 (follow-up). The sample included 1648 participants with baseline age ≥55 years (42% men, mean age 60 years) and <5 years occupational noise exposure after baseline. We analyzed the association between occupational noise exposure before baseline and mean hearing decline between 1998 and 2018 (20-year decline) at each frequency, adjusted for age, sex, education, and impulse noise exposure before baseline. RESULTS: Occupational noise exposure before baseline (N = 603) was associated with baseline hearing loss, but not with later accelerated 20-year decline, at any frequency. Noise-exposed persons had less subsequent 20-year decline at 3 kHz than did nonexposed. Restricting the noise-exposed group to persons who also had a baseline Coles notch (hearing thresholds at 3, 4, or 6 kHz of 10 dB or more compared with thresholds at 1 or 2 kHz and 6 or 8 kHz; N = 211), the exposed group showed less 20-year decline at both 3 and 4 kHz, as well as less accelerated 20-year decline at 8 kHz, compared with the nonexposed. CONCLUSION: Our large long-term longitudinal study shows no increased risk of continuing hearing decline after occupational noise exposure has ceased. The finding supports a conclusion that ear damage stops when the noise exposure is ended.
Subject(s)
Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced , Noise, Occupational , Occupational Diseases , Occupational Exposure , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Female , Longitudinal Studies , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/etiology , Noise, Occupational/adverse effects , Hearing , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/etiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the association between occupational noise exposure and tinnitus. Further, to assess whether the association depends on hearing status. DESIGN: In this cross-sectional study, tinnitus (>1 h daily) was regressed on job exposure matrix (JEM)-based or self-reported occupational noise exposure, adjusted for confounders. STUDY SAMPLE: The 14,945 participants (42% men, 20-59 years) attended a population-based study in Norway (HUNT4, 2017-2019). RESULTS: JEM-based noise exposure, assessed as equivalent continuous sound level normalised to 8-h working days (LEX 8 h), over the working career or as minimum 5 years ≥85 dB) was not associated with tinnitus. Years of exposure ≥80 dB (minimum one) was not associated with tinnitus. Self-reported high noise exposure (>15 h weekly ≥5 years) was associated with tinnitus overall and among persons with elevated hearing thresholds (prevalence ratio (PR) 1.3, 1.0-1.7), however not statistically significantly among persons with normal thresholds (PR 1.1, 0.8-1.5). CONCLUSIONS: Our large study showed no association between JEM-based noise exposure and tinnitus. This may to some extent reflect successful use of hearing protection. High self-reported noise exposure was associated with tinnitus, but not among normal hearing persons. This supports that noise-induced tinnitus to a large extent depends on audiometric hearing loss.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the association between occupational noise exposure and long-term hearing decline. DESIGN: This prospective cohort study used linear regression to investigate the association between occupational noise exposure and 20-year hearing decline, adjusted for important confounders. STUDY SAMPLE: The Norwegian cohort (N = 4,448) participated in two population-based health studies with pure-tone audiometry; HUNT2 1996-1998 and HUNT4 2017-2019. Exposure assessments included a quantitative job exposure matrix (JEM) and questionnaires. RESULTS: The participants (40.2% men, 20-39 years at baseline) had a mean 20-year decline (3-6 kHz) of 11.3 ± 9.8 decibels (dB). There was a positive association between 20-year logarithmic average noise level (JEM-based, LEX,20y) and 20-year hearing decline among men. Compared with no exposure ≥80 dB during follow-up, minimum 5 years of exposure ≥85 dB (JEM-based) predicted 2.6 dB (95% CI: 0.2-5.0) larger 20-year decline for workers aged 30-39 years at baseline, and -0.2 dB (95% CI: -2.2 to 1.7) for workers aged 20-29 years. Combining JEM information with self-reported noise exposure data resulted in stronger associations. CONCLUSION: This large longitudinal study shows an association between JEM-based noise exposure level and increased 20-year hearing decline among men. Contrary to expectations, the associations were weaker among younger workers, which might reflect a latency period.
ABSTRACT
BAKGRUNN: Implantasjon av hjertestarter (implantable cardioverter defibrillator, ICD) er etablert behandling hos pasienter med høy risiko for plutselig hjertedød. Studiens formål var å kartlegge pasientkarakteristika, indikasjoner, hyppigheten av ICD-støt, komplikasjoner, reoperasjoner samt endringer over tid i ICD-behandlingen ved St. Olavs hospital. MATERIALE OG METODE: Alle pasienter som fikk implantert hjertestarter ved St. Olavs hospital i perioden 2006-15 ble inkludert. Pasientene ble identifisert i pacemakerregisteret. Data ble hentet fra pacemakerregisteret og elektronisk pasientjournal. RESULTATER: Studien inkluderte 598 pasienter (82 % menn, medianalder 65 år). Tidligere hjertestans eller alvorlig arytmi forelå hos 401 (67 %) av dem som fikk implantert hjertestarter. Koronarsykdom (n = 383) var vanligste underliggende årsak. I oppfølgingstiden (median 3,6 år) fikk 203 (34 %) av pasientene ICD-støt, 154 (26 %) fikk berettigede og 65 (11 %) fikk uberettigede støt. Hos 139 (23 %) pasienter oppstod komplikasjoner. 101 (17 %) pasienter døde i oppfølgingsperioden. FORTOLKNING: Studien gir et godt grunnlag for kvalitetssikring av implantasjonsvirksomheten ved St. Olavs hospital. Kjønns- og aldersfordeling, indikasjon og underliggende årsaker for implantasjon samt hyppighet av støt og komplikasjoner samsvarer godt med tidligere publiserte data.
