Modeling and simulation of speed selection on left ventricular assist devices.

The control problem for LVADs is to set pump speed such that cardiac output and pressure perfusion are within acceptable physiological ranges. However, current technology of LVADs cannot provide for a closed-loop control scheme that can make adjustments based on the patient's level of activity. In this context, the SensorART Speed Selection Module (SSM) integrates various hardware and software components in order to improve the quality of the patients' treatment and the workflow of the specialists. It enables specialists to better understand the patient-device interactions, and improve their knowledge. The SensorART SSM includes two tools of the Specialist Decision Support System (SDSS); namely the Suction Detection Tool and the Speed Selection Tool. A VAD Heart Simulation Platform (VHSP) is also part of the system. The VHSP enables specialists to simulate the behavior of a patient׳s circulatory system, using different LVAD types and functional parameters. The SDSS is a web-based application that offers specialists with a plethora of tools for monitoring, designing the best therapy plan, analyzing data, extracting new knowledge and making informative decisions. In this paper, two of these tools, the Suction Detection Tool and Speed Selection Tool are presented. The former allows the analysis of the simulations sessions from the VHSP and the identification of issues related to suction phenomenon with high accuracy 93%. The latter provides the specialists with a powerful support in their attempt to effectively plan the treatment strategy. It allows them to draw conclusions about the most appropriate pump speed settings. Preliminary assessments connecting the Suction Detection Tool to the VHSP are presented in this paper.

Left ventricular pacing with a new quadripolar transvenous lead for CRT: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional implant outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Flexible left ventricular (LV) pacing configurations are a useful component of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) systems for preventing high LV pacing thresholds and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS). A quadripolar LV lead has recently been designed with the purpose of allowing more choices in lead placement location and programming capability. OBJECTIVE: To verify the effectiveness of quadripolar LV leads compared to conventional bipolar LV leads implant outcomes. METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients underwent implantation with either the quadripolar (n = 22; quadripolar group) or a conventional bipolar LV lead (n = 23; bipolar group). The primary outcome of the study was LV lead failure, defined as the need for lead revision or reprogramming during the first 3 months after implantation. Additionally, operative and follow-up data were prospectively noted and checked for significance between groups. RESULTS: The implantation success rate in both groups was 100%. Baseline characteristics, procedure duration, and fluoroscopy time did not differ significantly between groups. Two lead dislodgments (requiring reoperation) and 4 clinical PNS were reported in the bipolar group; reprogramming of the device was sufficient to prevent PNS in 3 patients, the fourth is pending solution. One PNS successfully managed noninvasively occurred in the quadripolar group. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, event-free survival for the combined primary outcome was significantly lower in patients with quadripolar leads (P = .037). CONCLUSION: This prospective, controlled study provides strong evidence that CRT with the quadripolar LV lead results in low rates of dislocations and phrenic nerve stimulation.