Cemented vs Cementless Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Yield Similar Short-Term Clinical Outcomes.

Background: In primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is ongoing controversy about optimal fixation (cemented vs cementless). Cemented TKA remains the gold standard, with the largest body of long-term evidence available to support it. However, cementless TKA implants are gaining popularity due to potential biomechanical advantages and a growing body of literature supporting survivorship. Due to paucity of literature investigating fixation methods in robotic-assisted TKA (Ra-TKA), we aim to compare clinical outcomes of cementless Ra-TKA with those of cemented Ra-TKA. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent Ra-TKA by 19 surgeons comparing results of cases using cementless vs cemented fixation. We observed short-term complications, emergency room visits, and readmissions. We collected patient-reported outcomes measurement information system and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome scores preoperatively and 12 weeks after surgery. Results: A total of 582 TKA cases were included: 335 cementless and 247 cemented. The patients in the cementless group were younger and had a higher body mass index. The cemented group had a higher rate of return to the operating room, with manipulation under anesthesia for stiffness being the most common indication in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences in 30-day readmissions, 90-day emergency room visits, or patient-reported outcomes. Conclusions: Our retrospective study demonstrated higher return to operating room in the cemented group vs the cementless group. We reported no differences in any other short-term outcomes between the cementless and cemented Ra-TKA. Our data support efficacy and safety of cementless Ra-TKA at 3-month follow-up.

Anatomic Navigation Using the Transverse Acetabular Ligament for Acetabular Component Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach.

The transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) is a reliable native anatomic landmark that can be used to guide accurate acetabular implant positioning during total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach. The accurate acetabular implant position is defined by the preoperative plan, which corresponds to the Lewinnek safe zone. This article describes the anatomy of the TAL , exposure of the TAL, and pearls and pitfalls for exposure of the acetabulum during total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach. This article discusses how the TAL is used to guide acetabular implant positioning and describes pilot data from our single surgeon case series (n = 31).

Quadriceps Tendon Attachment Technique for Medial Quadriceps Tendon-Femoral Ligament (MQTFL) Reconstruction in the Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Patella Dislocation.

Medial quadriceps tendon-femoral ligament (MQTFL) reconstruction for prevention of recurrent patella dislocation is an alternative to medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. Because the reconstruction graft attaches to the quadriceps tendon, no patella drill hole is required, thereby eliminating iatrogenic fracture risk. The procedure remains anatomically accurate and early results are comparable to MPFL reconstruction for preventing patella dislocation. The MQTFL reconstruction graft is brought up under the vastus medialis obliquus distal to the patella apex, such that its orientation is directed toward the medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) midpoint, also known as Tanaka's point. The graft is then secured by looping it around the vastus medialis and rectus femoris tendons, after which optimal graft length is easily established by cycling the knee, after which it is sutured securely into the deep quadriceps tendon precisely at the anatomic midpoint of the MPFC. Anatomic reconstruction of the MQTFL-in which graft orientation is crucial-confers reliable patellofemoral joint stability in the surgical treatment of patients with recurrent patella dislocations.

Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty are Associated With Lower Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Patient Satisfaction Scores Compared With Primary Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: As rates of primary total joint arthroplasty continue to rise, so do rates of revision. Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are more frequently done at larger centers, are associated with higher morbidity, and may have different patient satisfaction outcomes. This study compares the survey results of Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) between patients who underwent primary versus revision THA or TKA. METHODS: All adult patients who underwent inpatient, elective, primary, and revision THA or TKA at a single institution were selected for retrospective analysis. Patient demographics, comorbidities, functional status, surgical variables, 30-day outcomes, and HCAHPS scores were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done to determine correlations between the aforementioned variables and top-box HCAHPS survey scores for primary versus revision THA and TKA. RESULTS: Of 2,707 patients who met the inclusion criteria and had returned the HCAHPS survey, primary THA was documented in 1,075 patients (39.71%), revision THA in 75 (2.77%), primary TKA in 1,497 (55.30%), and revision TKA in 60 (2.22%). Revision THA patients were more functionally dependent, and TKA patients had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score than their primary comparators. Revisions had longer hospital length of stay for both procedures. For THA, revision THA patients demonstrated lower total top-box rates compared withprimary THA patients (71.64% versus 75.67% top-box, P < 0.001) and lower scores on the care from doctors subsection (76.26% versus 85.34%, P < 0.001) of the HCAHPS survey. Similarly, for TKA, revision TKA patients demonstrated lower total top-box rates (76.13% versus 79.22%, P < 0.013) and lower scores on the care from doctors subsection (66.28% versus 83.65%, P < 0.001) of the HCAHPS survey. DISCUSSION: For both THA and TKA, revision procedures were associated with lower total HCAHPS scores and rated care from doctors. This suggests that HCAHPS scores may be biased by factors outside the surgeon's control, such as the complexity associated with revision procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

An Imaging Overview of the Posterior Septum of the Knee and Trans-Septal Portal Procedure: Normal Anatomy, Indications, and Unique Imaging Considerations.

The posterior trans-septal portal technique is an arthroscopic surgery of the knee providing surgeons with the ability to fully visualize the posterior compartment. With this procedure, portals are placed at the posteromedial and posterolateral aspect of the knee. Visualization of the medial and lateral posterior compartments then allows working space for the creation of the intra-articular portal that is made by dividing the posterior septum. We provide an imaging overview of the posterior septum, the trans-septal portal technique, possible indications, and introduce how surrounding anatomy may warrant unique imaging considerations.

Coronal Malalignment-When and How to Perform a Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy.

Coronal malalignment of the patellofemoral joint may contribute to both instability as well as pain and joint overload. The use of distal realignment procedures has evolved to include uniplanar and multiplanar osteotomies, which allows patient-specific treatment. With a careful understanding of the complex pathoanatomy, including osseous, soft tissue, and dynamic muscular factors, an appropriately designed tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) is an invaluable tool for the orthopedic surgeon to improve joint biomechanics and off-load articular injuries. Current techniques have improved TTO surgery to limit complications and produce reliably good results.

Clusters of Injuries From Motorcycle Collisions: Exploratory Factor Analysis of a Single Institution Trauma Registry.

Objective With the goal of guiding acute management of associated injuries motorcycle trauma patients, this study aims to identify patterns of associated injuries after motorcycle collisions using exploratory factor analysis. Methods We conducted a retrospective review at a Level 1 trauma center of all patients who presented after motorcycle collisions resulting in trauma system activations between July 2, 2002 and December 31, 2013. We performed exploratory factor analysis on this dataset to identify sets of injuries that cluster together. Results We identified 1,050 patients who presented for trauma after a motorcycle collision. These patients had 3,101 injuries, including 1,694 fractures. Using exploratory factor analysis, we developed a model with four latent factors that explained approximately half of the variance in injuries. These factors were defined by: head and cervical spine injuries; extremity injuries; abdomen, pelvis and upper extremity injuries; and shoulder girdle and thorax injuries. We also found a novel injury pattern relationship between forearm shaft/wrist and lower extremity injuries. Conclusions Motorcycle trauma results in distinct clusters of associated injuries likely due to common motorcycle collision patterns, most notably a novel relationship between forearm shaft/wrist and lower extremity injuries that merits further exploration, and could play a role during secondary survey.

Retroperitoneal Approach for Excision of Wear-Debris Pseudotumor: A Case Report.

CASE: Pelvic pseudotumors may occur as a reaction to wear-debris after hip arthroplasty and are rarely treated with surgery. We describe an instance in which a pelvic pseudotumor along the iliopsoas muscle tendon sheath was debulked using a retroperitoneal approach in a patient presenting for treatment of a prosthetic hip infection. The patient recovered uneventfully and was ambulatory with a new hip prosthesis at 3 months after procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneal exposure provided safe, excellent exposure to a wear-debris pelvic pseudotumor in this case.

Parental understanding of intoeing gait - A preliminary study.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of a child's intoeing gait is one of the most common referrals made to a pediatric orthopedist. Families may have difficulty understanding the often transient and usually benign nature of intoeing. The purpose of this study was to investigate parental perceptions of an intoeing gait both before and after consultation with an orthopedic practitioner. METHODS: 48 parents of children referred to pediatric orthopedic surgeons for evaluation of intoeing gait completed a 22-item questionnaire that assessed demographics, anxiety, and parental perceptions of intoeing. Questionnaires were administered before and after visits. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: Before their visits, parents reported similar levels of anxiety and understanding regarding intoeing, independent of their age or education. After the visits, anxiety decreased (P < 0.001), and understanding increased (P < 0.001) although younger parents (18-25 years) reported higher post-visit anxiety compared to parents older than 25 (P = 0.014). Similarly, parents with a high school degree or less reported higher post-visit anxiety compared to parents who attended college (P = 0.009). Post-visit understanding was inversely correlated with post-visit anxiety (r = -0.717; P < 0.001). Additionally, parents who reported high anxiety post-visit stated they were more likely to seek additional care (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Younger parents with lower education levels were more likely to leave visits with high anxiety and poor understanding. These parents were more likely to consider seeking further treatment for their child's intoeing, placing additional stress on their child, themselves and an overburdened healthcare system.

The Grapefruit: An Alternative Arthroscopic Tool Skill Platform.

PURPOSE: To establish the construct validity of an arthroscopic training model that teaches arthroscopic tool skills including triangulation, grasping, precision biting, implant delivery and ambidexterity and uses a whole grapefruit for its training platform. METHODS: For the grapefruit training model (GTM), an arthroscope and arthroscopic instruments were introduced through portals cut in the grapefruit skin of a whole prepared grapefruit. After institutional review board approval, participants performed a set of tasks inside the grapefruit. Performance for each component was assessed by recording errors, achievement of criteria, and time to completion. A total of 19 medical students, orthopaedic surgery residents, and fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons were included in the analysis and were divided into 3 groups based on arthroscopic experience. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the post hoc Tukey test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: One-way ANOVA showed significant differences in both time to completion and errors between groups, F(2, 16) = 16.10, P < .001; F(2, 16) = 17.43, P < .001. Group A had a longer time to completion and more errors than group B (P = .025, P = .019), and group B had a longer time to completion and more errors than group C (P = .023, P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: The GTM is an easily assembled and an alternative arthroscopic training model that bridges the gap between box trainers, cadavers, and virtual reality simulators. Our findings suggest construct validity when evaluating its use for teaching the basic arthroscopic tool skills. As such, it is a useful addition to the arthroscopic training toolbox. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There is a need for validated low-cost arthroscopic training models that are easily accessible.