ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study investigates the role of bacterial vaginosis (BV) on pregnancy rates during various fertility treatments. BV is known to influence several obstetric outcomes, such as preterm delivery and endometritis. Only few studies investigated the effect of BV in subfertile women, and studies found a negative effect on fecundity especially in the in vitro fertilisation population. METHODS: Observational prospective study, 76 couples attending a fertility clinic in the Netherlands between July 2019 and June 2022, undergoing a total of 133 attempts of intra uterine insemination, in vitro fertilization or intra cytoplasmatic sperm injection. Vaginal samples taken at oocyte retrieval or insemination were analysed on qPCR BV and 16S rRNA gene microbiota analysis of V1-V2 region. Logistic regression with a Generalized Estimated Equations analysis was used to account for multiple observations per couples. RESULTS: A total of 26% of the 133 samples tested positive for BV. No significant differences were observed in ongoing pregnancy or live birth rates based on BV status (OR 0.50 (0.16-1.59), aOR 0.32 (0.09-1.23)) or microbiome community state type. There was a tendency of more miscarriages based on positive BV status (OR 4.22 (1.10-16.21), aOR 4.28 (0.65-28.11)) or community state type group III and IV. On baseline qPCR positive participants had significantly higher body mass index and smoked more often. Odds ratios were adjusted for smoking status, body mass index, and socioeconomic status. CONCLUSION: Bacterial vaginosis does not significantly impact ongoing pregnancy rates but could affect miscarriage rates.
Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous , Infertility , Vaginosis, Bacterial , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Male , Humans , Female , Prospective Studies , Vaginosis, Bacterial/complications , Vaginosis, Bacterial/epidemiology , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Semen , Fertilization in Vitro , Pregnancy Rate , Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology , FertilityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Host-cell DNA methylation analysis can be used to triage women with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive self-collected cervicovaginal samples, but current data are restricted to under-/never-screened women and referral populations. This study evaluated triage performance in women who were offered primary HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening. METHODS: Self-collected samples from 593 HPV-positive women who participated in a primary HPV self-sampling trial (IMPROVE study; NTR5078), were tested for the DNA methylation markers ASCL1 and LHX8 using quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR (qMSP). The diagnostic performance for CIN3 and cervical cancer (CIN3 + ) was evaluated and compared with that of paired HPV-positive clinician-collected cervical samples. RESULTS: Significantly higher methylation levels were found in HPV-positive self-collected samples of women with CIN3 + than control women with no evidence of disease (P values <0.0001). The marker panel ASCL1/LHX8 yielded a sensitivity for CIN3 + detection of 73.3% (63/86; 95% CI 63.9-82.6%), with a corresponding specificity of 61.1% (310/507; 95% CI 56.9-65.4%). The relative sensitivity for detecting CIN3+ was 0.95 (95% CI 0.82-1.10) for self-collection versus clinician-collection, and the relative specificity was 0.82 (95% CI 0.75-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: The ASCL1/LHX8 methylation marker panel constitutes a feasible direct triage method for the detection of CIN3 + in HPV-positive women participating in routine screening by self-sampling.
Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/genetics , DNA Methylation , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Biomarkers , Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, lower high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) positivity but higher cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ detection were found in self-collected compared with clinician-collected samples. To investigate the possible reason for these differences, we compared sociodemographic and screening characteristics of women and related these to screening outcomes. METHODS: We extracted data from PALGA on all primary hrHPV screens and associated follow-up tests for 857,866 screened women, invited in 2017 and 2018. We linked these data with sociodemographic data from Statistics Netherlands. Logistic regression was performed for hrHPV positivity and CIN 2+/3+ detection. RESULTS: Out of the 857,866 women, 6.8% chose to use a self-sampling device. A higher proportion of self-sampling users was ages 30 to 35 years, was not previously screened, was living in a one-person household, or was the breadwinner in the household. After adjustment for these factors self-sampling had lower hrHPV positivity (aOR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.63-0.68)) as compared with clinician-collected sampling, as well as lower odds of CIN 2+ (aOR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70-0.82) and CIN 3+ (aOR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78-0.95) detection. CONCLUSIONS: It is likely that the observed differences between the two sampling methods are not only related to sociodemographic differences, but related to differences in screening test accuracy and/or background risk. IMPACT: Self-sampling can be used for targeting underscreened women, as a more convenient screening tool. Further investigation is required to evaluate how to implement self-sampling, when it is used as a primary instrument in routine screening. See related commentary by Arbyn et al., p. 159.
Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Adult , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Specimen Handling/methods , Mass Screening/methods , PapillomaviridaeABSTRACT
Methylation of host-cell deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) has been proposed as a promising biomarker for triage of high-risk (hr) human papillomavirus (HPV) positive women at screening. Our study aims to validate recently identified host-cell DNA methylation markers for triage in an hrHPV-positive cohort derived from primary HPV-based cervical screening in The Netherlands. Methylation markers ASCL1, LHX8, ST6GALNAC5, GHSR, ZIC1 and SST were evaluated relative to the ACTB reference gene by multiplex quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) in clinician-collected cervical samples (n = 715) from hrHPV-positive women (age 29-60 years), who were enrolled in the Dutch IMPROVE screening trial (NTR5078). Primary clinical end-point was cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) or cancer (CIN3+). The single-marker and bi-marker methylation classifiers developed for CIN3 detection in a previous series of hrHPV-positive clinician-collected cervical samples were applied. The diagnostic accuracy was visualised using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and assessed through area under the ROC curve (AUC). The performance of the methylation markers to detect CIN3+ was determined using the predefined threshold calibrated at 70% clinical specificity. Individual methylation makers showed good performance for CIN3+ detection, with highest AUC for ASCL1 (0.844) and LHX8 (0.830). Combined as a bi-marker panel with predefined threshold, ASCL1/LHX8 yielded a CIN3+ sensitivity of 76.9% (70/91; 95% CI 68.3-85.6%) at a specificity of 74.5% (465/624; 95% CI 71.1-77.9%). In conclusion, our study shows that the individual host-cell DNA methylation classifiers and the bi-marker panel ASCL1/LHX8 have clinical utility for the detection of CIN3+ in hrHPV-positive women invited for routine screening.
Subject(s)
DNA Methylation , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Triage , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/genetics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/genetics , Adult , Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors/genetics , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , LIM-Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Middle Aged , Receptors, Ghrelin/genetics , Sialyltransferases/genetics , Somatostatin/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing on self-collected samples has potential as a primary screening tool in cervical screening, but real-world evidence on its accuracy in hrHPV-based screening programmes is lacking. METHODS: In the Netherlands, women aged 30-60 years invited for cervical screening can choose between sampling at the clinician's office (Cervex Brush) or self-sampling at home (Evalyn Brush). HrHPV testing is performed using Roche Cobas 4800. We collected screening test results between January 2017 and March 2018 and histological follow-up until August 2019. The main outcome measures were mean cycle threshold (Ct) value, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 or cancer (CIN3+) and CIN grade 2 or worse (CIN2+). FINDINGS: 30,808 women had a self-collected and 456,207 had a clinician-collected sample. In hrHPV-positive women with adequate cytology, Ct values were higher for self-collection than clinician-collection with a mean Ct difference of 1·25 (95% CI 0·98-1·52) in women without CIN2+, 2·73 (1·75-3·72) in CIN2 and 3·59 (3·03-4·15) in CIN3+. The relative sensitivity for detecting CIN3+ was 0·94 (0·90-0·97) for self-collection versus clinician-collection and the relative specificity was 1·02 (1·02-1·02). INTERPRETATION: The clinical accuracy of hrHPV testing on a self-collected sample for detection of CIN3+ is high and supports its use as a primary screening test for all invited women. Because of the slightly lower sensitivity of hrHPV testing on a self-collected compared to a clinician-collected sample, an evaluation of the workflow procedure to optimise clinical performance seems warranted. FUNDING: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (the Netherlands) and the European Commission.
ABSTRACT
Abnormal vaginal discharge may be caused by bacterial vaginosis, vulvovaginal candidiasis, trichomoniasis and/or aerobic vaginitis. For the development of a diagnostic algorithm, tree-based classification analysis was performed on symptoms, signs and bedside test results of 56 patients, and laboratory tests (culture, Nugent score, qPCRs) were compared. Amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene was used as reference test for bacterial vaginosis and aerobic vaginitis, culture for vulvovaginal candidiasis and qPCR for trichomoniasis. For bacterial vaginosis, the best diagnostic algorithm was to screen at the bedside with a pH and odour test and if positive, to confirm by qPCR (sensitivity 94%; specificity 97%) rather than Nugent score (sensitivity of 59%; specificity 97%; P = 0.031). The analysis for the other infections was less conclusive due to the low number of patients with these infections. For bacterial vaginosis, the developed algorithm is sensitive, specific, and reduces the need for laboratory tests in 50% of the patients.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Vaginal Discharge/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Female , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Odorants , Pilot Projects , Vaginal Discharge/microbiology , Vaginal Discharge/parasitology , Vaginosis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Young AdultABSTRACT
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is perceived as a condition of disrupted vaginal microbiota, but remains of unknown aetiology. In this study, vaginal microbiota composition was determined in twenty-one women with BV, before and after treatment with metronidazole or clindamycin. Microbiota composition varied greatly between women and defining a (un)healthy vaginal microbiota state remains elusive, challenging BV diagnosis and treatment. While relative abundance of Lactobacillus increased after antibiotic treatment in two-third of women, its abundance was not associated with treatment outcome. Instead, remaining complaints of abnormal vaginal discharge were more common after metronidazole treatment and associated with increased relative abundance of Ureaplasma.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Microbiota/drug effects , Vaginosis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Vaginosis, Bacterial/microbiology , Adult , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/drug effects , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Clindamycin/therapeutic use , Female , Host Specificity , Humans , Metronidazole/therapeutic use , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Vagina/microbiology , Vaginal Discharge/drug therapy , Vaginal Discharge/microbiologyABSTRACT
International surveys find HPV-negativity in up to 30% of cervical adenocarcinomas. We investigated the pathological diagnosis by expert consensus with immunohistochemistry and the presence of somatic mutations in recognised tumour genes in HPV-positive and negative cervical adenocarcinomas (CADC). A sample was selected of 45 paraffin-embedded cervical blocks diagnosed locally as usual cervical adenocarcinoma from a global study. These represented different diagnoses made at previous diagnostic review and HPV status. All were suitable for analysis for somatic tumour associated gene mutations. Three pathologists examined H/E slides and immunohistochemistry for p16, progesterone receptor and p53 and classified the cases. L1 genes from high-risk HPVs and low-risk HPVs were analysed by SPF10 PCR-DEIA-LiPA25 version 1 in whole tissue sections and microdissected tumour and retested by PCR for E6/E7 genes of hrHPVs if negative. Cases were analysed for microsatellite instability and next-generation sequencing mutation analysis. From the 45 cases, 20 cases of usual CADC were confirmed of which 17 (85%) were HPV-positive in tumour cells. The other 25 cases were reclassified as endometrial, serous, clear-cell and gastric-type adenocarcinomas and all were HPV-negative in tumour cells. Careful retesting for HPV DNA and IHC leads to more accurate identification of HPV-positive usual cervical adenocarcinomas. Endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinomas, other uterine adenocarcinoma with multiple somatic mutations were important in misclassification of HPV-negative cases locally managed as cervical adenocarcinoma, as was gastric-type adenocarcinoma with germline STK11 mutation in East Asia. Few consensuses confirmed HPV-negative usual cervical adenocarcinomas showed somatic tumorigenic mutations also seen in some HPV-positive usual CADC.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/virology , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Carcinogenesis/genetics , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Cervix Uteri/virology , Cross-Sectional Studies , DNA Mutational Analysis , DNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Diagnostic Errors , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Mutation , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Retrospective Studies , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In January 2017, the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme transitioned from cytomorphological to primary high-risk HPV (hrHPV) DNA screening, including the introduction of self-sampling, for women aged between 30 and 60 years. The Netherlands was the first country to switch to hrHPV screening at the national level. We investigated the health impact of this transition by comparing performance indicators from the new hrHPV-based programme with the previous cytology-based programme. METHODS: We obtained data from the Dutch nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology (PALGA) for 454,573 women eligible for screening in 2017 who participated in the hrHPV-based programme between 1 January 2017 and 30 June 2018 (maximum follow-up of almost 21 months) and for 483,146 women eligible for screening in 2015 who participated in the cytology-based programme between 1 January 2015 and 31 March 2016 (maximum follow-up of 40 months). We compared indicators of participation (participation rate), referral (screen positivity; referral rate) and detection (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) detection; number of referrals per detected CIN lesion). RESULTS: Participation in the hrHPV-based programme was significantly lower than that in the cytology-based programme (61% vs 64%). Screen positivity and direct referral rates were significantly higher in the hrHPV-based programme (positivity rate: 5% vs 9%; referral rate: 1% vs 3%). CIN2+ detection increased from 11 to 14 per 1000 women screened. Overall, approximately 2.2 times more clinical irrelevant findings (i.e. ≤CIN1) were found in the hrHPV-based programme, compared with approximately 1·3 times more clinically relevant findings (i.e. CIN2+); this difference was mostly due to a national policy change recommending colposcopy, rather than observation, of hrHPV-positive, ASC-US/LSIL results in the hrHPV-based programme. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first time that comprehensive results of nationwide implementation of hrHPV-based screening have been reported using high-quality data with a long follow-up. We have shown that both benefits and potential harms are higher in one screening round of a well-implemented hrHPV-based screening programme than in an established cytology-based programme. Lower participation in the new hrHPV programme may be due to factors such as invitation policy changes and the phased roll-out of the new programme. Our findings add further to evidence from trials and modelling studies on the effectiveness of hrHPV-based screening.
Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common gynaecological condition. Diagnosis of BV is typically based on Amsel criteria, Nugent score and/or bacterial culture. In this study, these conventional methods and two CE-IVD marked quantitative real-time (q)PCR assays were compared with microbiota analysis for the diagnosis of BV. Eighty women were evaluated for BV during two sequential hospital visits by Amsel criteria, Nugent score, culture, the AmpliSens® Florocenosis/Bacterial vaginosis-FRT PCR kit (InterLabService, Moscow, Russia), and the BD MAX™ Vaginal Panel (BD Diagnostics, MD, USA). Microbiota analysis based on amplicon sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene was used as reference test. The microbiota profile of 36/115 (31%) included cases was associated with BV. Based on microbiota analysis, the sensitivity of detecting BV was 38.9% for culture, 61.15% for Amsel criteria, 63.9% for Nugent score and the BD MAX assay, and 80.6% for the AmpliSens assay, while the specificity of all methods was ≥ 92.4%. Microbiota profiles of the cases with discrepant results between microbiota analysis and the diagnostic methods were variable. All five diagnostic methods missed BV positive cases with a relatively high abundance of the genus Alloscardovia, Bifidobacterium, or Dialister, which were categorised as unspecified dysbiosis by the AmpliSens assay. Compared to Amsel criteria, Nugent score, culture, and the BD MAX assay, the AmpliSens assay was most in agreement with microbiota analysis, indicating that currently, the AmpliSens assay may be the best diagnostic method available to diagnose BV in a routine clinical setting.
Subject(s)
Bacteria/isolation & purification , Microbiological Techniques/standards , Microbiota , Vaginosis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Bacteria/genetics , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Diagnostic Tests, Routine , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Vagina/microbiology , Vaginosis, Bacterial/microbiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on self-collected samples is a potential alternative to HPV testing on clinician-collected samples, but non-inferiority of its clinical accuracy remains to be assessed in the regular screening population. The IMPROVE study was done to evaluate the clinical accuracy of primary HPV testing on self-collected samples within an organised screening setting. METHODS: In this randomised, non-inferiority trial, women aged 29-61 years were invited to participate in the study as part of their regular screening invitation in the Netherlands. Women who provided informed consent were randomly allocated (1:1, with a block size of ten stratified by age) to one of two groups: a self-sampling group, in which women were requested to collect their own cervicovaginal sample using an Evalyn Brush (Rovers Medical Devices BV, Oss, Netherlands); or a clinician-based sampling group, in which samples were collected by a general practitioner with a Cervex-Brush (Rovers Medical Devices BV). All samples were tested for HPV using the clinically validated GP5+/6+ PCR enzyme immunoassay (Labo Biomedical Products BV, Rijswijk, Netherlands). HPV-positive women in both groups were retested with the other collection method and triaged by cytology and repeat cytology in accordance with current Dutch screening guidelines. Primary endpoints were detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) of grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and grade 3 or worse (CIN3+). Non-inferiority of HPV testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples was evaluated against a margin of 90% for the relative sensitivity and 98% for the relative specificity. This study is registered at the Dutch Trial register (NTR5078) and has been completed. FINDINGS: Of the 187â473 women invited to participate, 8212 were randomly allocated to the self-sampling group and 8198 to the clinician-based sampling group. After exclusion of women who met the exclusion criteria or who did not return their sample, 7643 women were included in the self-sampling group and 6282 in the clinician-based sampling group. 569 (7·4%) self-collected samples and 451 (7·2%) clinician-collected samples tested positive for HPV (relative risk 1·04 [95% CI 0·92-1·17]). Median follow-up duration for HPV-positive women was 20 months (IQR 17-22). The CIN2+ sensitivity and specificity of HPV testing did not differ between self-sampling and clinician-based sampling (relative sensitivity 0·96 [0·90-1·03]; relative specificity 1·00 [0·99-1·01]). For the CIN3+ endpoint, relative sensitivity was 0·99 (0·91-1·08) and relative specificity was 1·00 (0·99-1·01). INTERPRETATION: HPV testing done with a clinically validated PCR-based assay had similar accuracy on self-collected and clinician-collected samples in terms of the detection of CIN2+ or CIN3+ lesions. These findings suggest that HPV self-sampling could be used as a primary screening method in routine screening. FUNDING: Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sport (Netherlands), and the European Commission.
Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Self Care , Specimen Handling/methods , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology , Adult , Cytodiagnosis , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Oropharyngeal cancer incidence is rapidly rising due to human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 infection. The dearth of data on effectiveness of national female-only vaccination programs in preventing oral HPV infection and potential herd immunity in unvaccinated males has resulted in considerable controversy regarding the need to vaccinate males, especially in countries with high female vaccination coverage. METHODS: Subjects aged 0-65 years undergoing tonsillectomy for nonmalignant indications were recruited in 6 hospitals in the United Kingdom. Oral samples were collected as follows: oral rinse, tongue base, and pharyngeal wall brushes, then tonsil tissue (tonsillectomy). Vaccination data were obtained from regional health authorities. All samples were centrally tested for HPV DNA by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Of 940 subjects, 243 females and 69 males were aged 12-24 years (median age, 18.6 years), with 189 (78%) females and no males vaccinated against HPV. Overall, oropharyngeal HPV-16 prevalence was significantly lower in vaccinated versus unvaccinated females (0.5% vs 5.6%, P = .04). In contrast, prevalence of any oropharyngeal HPV type was similar in vaccinated and unvaccinated females (19% vs 20%, P = .76). Oropharyngeal HPV-16 prevalence in unvaccinated males was similar to vaccinated females (0% vs 0.5%, P > .99), and lower than unvaccinated females (0% vs 5.6%, P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the UK female-only vaccination program is associated with significant reductions in oropharyngeal HPV-16 infections. These are also the first data to suggest potential herd immunity from female-only vaccination against oropharyngeal HPV infection in contemporaneously aged males.
Subject(s)
Human papillomavirus 16/immunology , Immunity, Herd , Immunization Programs , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/immunology , Vaccination , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Prevalence , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: A hospital-based multicenter, retrospective study was conducted to compare the distribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and cervical adenocarcinoma (CADC) in China. METHODS: Paraffin-embedded tissue blocks diagnosed as SCC and CADC across China were collected, as well as the total number of diagnosed invasive cervical cancer of the 9 selected centers. DNA enzyme immunoassay, reverse hybridization, and multiplex type-specific polymerase chain reaction were used for HPV genotyping. RESULTS: The ratios of CADC to SCC were increasing from 2005 to 2010, in parallel with HPV prevalence in CADC. In 630 patients with SCC (mean ± SD age, 45.40 ± 10.30) and 718 patients with CADC (mean ± SD age, 46.09 ± 10.59) recruited, HPV prevalence rates were 97.6% and 74.5%, respectively. Human papillomavirus viral load for SCC is significantly higher than that for CADC. Most common HPV types distributed in SCC and CADC were HPV-16 (78.5%, 75.1%-81.6%; 47.1%, 42.9%-51.3%), HPV-18 (8.0%, 6.1%-10.4%; 41.1%, 37.0%-45.3%), HPV-52 (2.3%, 1.4%-3.8%; 5.6%, 4.0%-7.9%), and HPV-45 (1.1%, 0.6%-2.3%; 3.9%, 2.6%-5.9%). Different diagnostic mean ± SD age for HPV-16/HPV-18 versus other high-risk HPV types were observed: SCC (44.5 ± 9.94 vs 51.0 ± 10.83, p < .05) and CADC (44.1 ± 9.44 vs 47.4 ± 10.41, p = .006). For HPV-negative cases, mean ± SD age was 46.1 ± 10.73 in SCC and 50.3 ± 11.85 in CADC, which were older than the positive (45.4 ± 10.31, 44.5 ± 9.64). HPV-16 and HPV-18 were the most frequent HPV types in both histological types, and HPV-18 was more frequent in CADC than in SCC. CONCLUSIONS: Human papillomavirus infection was identified more often in SCC than in CADC. Women with HPV-associated cancers, especially HPV-16/HPV-18, were of a younger age at diagnosis when compared with non-HPV-associated cancers.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/virology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology , Genotype , Papillomaviridae/classification , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , China/epidemiology , Female , Genotyping Techniques/methods , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Middle Aged , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Nucleic Acid Hybridization , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pathology, Molecular/methods , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Viral Load , Young AdultABSTRACT
DNA methylation is a well-known epigenetic modification that plays a crucial role in gene regulation, but genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation remains technically challenging and costly. DNA methylation-dependent restriction enzymes can be used to restrict CpG methylation analysis to methylated regions of the genome only, which significantly reduces the required sequencing depth and simplifies subsequent bioinformatics analysis. Unfortunately, this approach has been hampered by complete digestion of DNA in CpG methylation-dense regions, resulting in fragments that are too small for accurate mapping. Here, we show that the activity of DNA methylation-dependent enzyme, LpnPI, is blocked by a fragment size smaller than 32 bp. This unique property prevents complete digestion of methylation-dense DNA and allows accurate genome-wide analysis of CpG methylation at single-nucleotide resolution. Methylated DNA sequencing (MeD-seq) of LpnPI digested fragments revealed highly reproducible genome-wide CpG methylation profiles for >50% of all potentially methylated CpGs, at a sequencing depth less than one-tenth required for whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS). MeD-seq identified a high number of patient and tissue-specific differential methylated regions (DMRs) and revealed that patient-specific DMRs observed in both blood and buccal samples predict DNA methylation in other tissues and organs. We also observed highly variable DNA methylation at gene promoters on the inactive X Chromosome, indicating tissue-specific and interpatient-specific escape of X Chromosome inactivation. These findings highlight the potential of MeD-seq for high-throughput epigenetic profiling.
Subject(s)
Chromosomes, Human, X , CpG Islands , DNA Methylation/physiology , Deoxyribonuclease I/chemistry , Epigenesis, Genetic , Genome-Wide Association Study , X Chromosome Inactivation , Chromosomes, Human, X/chemistry , Chromosomes, Human, X/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, X/metabolism , Female , HumansABSTRACT
We investigated HPV in adenocarcinoma presenting and managed as cervical adenocarcinoma (CADC) at seven major representative regional cancer centres across China. From 1,051 CADC cases diagnosed locally in 2005-2010, 881 had available paraffin embedded tissue. Initial review excluded 154 cases as other diagnoses or inappropriate specimens. In 718 eligible cases consensus panel pathology diagnosis was made using an algorithm incorporating p16 and progesterone receptor immunohistochemistry (IHC). Classification of cervical adenocarcinoma categories was subject to substantial pathological disagreement. High-risk human papillomaviruses (HR-HPV) DNA was studied by the sensitive SPF10 PCR-DEIA-LiPA25 version 1 for L1 genes and type-specific HR-HPV E6/7 gene PCR's. HR-HPV prevalence in whole tissue samples in eligible tested CADC was 74.5%: 100.0% in neuro-endocrine carcinoma (NEC), 82.2% in classical cervical adenocarcinoma (ADC-CX), 40.0% in adenocarcinoma-not otherwise specified (ADC-NOS) and 33.3% in endometrioid adenocarcinoma (ADC-ENDO). Higher mean age at diagnosis correlated with histological categories showing low HPV prevalence (Linear regression: ß= -13.794, p < 0.001). HPV-16 and 18 were associated with early development of CADC and a lower mean age correlated with carcinogenic risk of associated HPV (ß = -0.1829, p < 0.001). HPV-16 or HPV-18 was found in 88.2% of all HPV positive cases including multiple-infections. HPV-18 was the commonest HPV type in NEC (58.3%), ASC (40.2%) and ADC-CX (40.9%). The proportion of HPV-unrelated CADC and in different final histological categories varied geographically and by age. Although HPV negativity was predominantly associated with special categories of CADC, some HPV-negative usual adenocarcinomas indistinguishable by adjudicated microscopic diagnosis from ADC-CX were found and varied in frequency across China.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/etiology , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Papillomaviridae , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/etiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers , China/epidemiology , DNA, Viral , Female , Genotype , Hospitals , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Papillomaviridae/classification , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Population Surveillance , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although the risk of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is greatest in young women, women older than 25 years remain at risk. We present data from the VIVIANE study of the HPV 16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in adult women after 7 years of follow-up. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, healthy women older than 25 years were enrolled (age stratified: 26-35 years, 36-45 years, and ≥46 years). Up to 15% in each age stratum had a history of HPV infection or disease. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive HPV 16/18 vaccine or aluminium hydroxide control, with an internet-based system. The primary endpoint was vaccine efficacy against 6-month persistent infection or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or greater (CIN1+) associated with HPV 16/18. We did analyses in the according-to-protocol cohort for efficacy and total vaccinated cohort. Data for the combined primary endpoint in the according-to-protocol cohort for efficacy were considered significant when the lower limit of the 96·2% CI around the point estimate was greater than 30%. For all other endpoints and cohorts, data were considered significant when the lower limit of the 96·2% CI was greater than 0%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00294047. FINDINGS: The first participant was enrolled on Feb 16, 2006, and the last study visit took place on Jan 29, 2014. 4407 women were in the according-to-protocol cohort for efficacy (n=2209 vaccine, n=2198 control) and 5747 women in the total vaccinated cohort (n=2877 vaccine, n=2870 control). At month 84, in women seronegative for the corresponding HPV type in the according-to-protocol cohort for efficacy, vaccine efficacy against 6-month persistent infection or CIN1+ associated with HPV 16/18 was significant in all age groups combined (90·5%, 96·2% CI 78·6-96·5). Vaccine efficacy against HPV 16/18-related cytological abnormalities (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) and CIN1+ was also significant. We also noted significant cross-protective efficacy against 6-month persistent infection with HPV 31 (65·8%, 96·2% CI 24·9-85·8) and HPV 45 (70·7%, 96·2% CI 34·2-88·4). In the total vaccinated cohort, vaccine efficacy against CIN1+ irrespective of HPV was significant (22·9%, 96·2% CI 4·8-37·7). Serious adverse events related to vaccination occurred in five (0·2%) of 2877 women in the vaccine group and eight (0·3%) of 2870 women in the control group. INTERPRETATION: In women older than 25 years, the HPV 16/18 vaccine continues to protect against infections, cytological abnormalities, and lesions associated with HPV 16/18 and CIN1+ irrespective of HPV type, and infection with non-vaccine types HPV 31 and HPV 45 over 7 years of follow-up. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.
Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , Human papillomavirus 16/immunology , Human papillomavirus 18/immunology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Adult , DNA, Viral , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Papillomaviridae/immunology , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Vaccines/immunology , Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virologyABSTRACT
Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is reported in 60-100% of cervical adenocarcinoma (CADC) globally. We investigated this relationship in a hospital-based survey in China. 718 CADC samples from nine Chinese regions were analysed. Expert pathologists reviewed cases with p16 and progesterone receptor immunostaining. Cases were tested for HPV using whole-tissue sections (WTS) and laser-capture microdissection. All cases were HPV-tested by L1 based broad-spectrum SPF10 -DEIA-LiPA25 PCR. Negative cases were tested for DNA adequacy and with E6 oncogene, type-specific HPV PCRs. Using WTS-PCR CADC showed overall 75% HPV-positivity (33-100% for different histological types). LCM-PCR showed that none of minimal deviation or serous CADC, and <10% of all clear cell and endometrioid CADC were HPV-positive in tumour cells. Usual and adenosquamous CADC showed a single HPV genotype in 60 and 78% cases. In some cases, HPV was found in adjacent cervix but not in tumour. HPV 16, 18 and 45 accounted for 90% of HPV in tumour cells. Patients with HPV-positive tumours were on average 6 years younger and presented at a lower clinicopathological stage as compared to patients with HPV-negative cancers. CADC is diverse pathologically and in HPV status. Special histopathological tumor subtypes may develop through different cellular and molecular pathways. Between 20 and 40% usual and adenosquamous types, in particular these diagnosed in older women and at advanced FIGO stages, are not driven by oncogenic HPV. In these cases HPV may not be involved in carcinogenisis or maybe lost during tumour progression.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Adult , China/epidemiology , DNA, Viral/analysis , Female , Humans , Laser Capture Microdissection , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Cervical glandular neoplasias (CGN) present a challenge for cervical cancer prevention due to their complex histopathology and difficulties in detecting preinvasive stages with current screening practices. Reports of human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence and type-distribution in CGN vary, providing uncertain evidence to support prophylactic vaccination and HPV screening. This study [108288/108290] assessed HPV prevalence and type-distribution in women diagnosed with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS, N = 49), adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC, N = 104), and various adenocarcinoma subtypes (ADC, N = 461) from 17 European countries, using centralised pathology review and sensitive HPV testing. The highest HPV-positivity rates were observed in AIS (93.9%), ASC (85.6%), and usual-type ADC (90.4%), with much lower rates in rarer ADC subtypes (clear-cell: 27.6%; serous: 30.4%; endometrioid: 12.9%; gastric-type: 0%). The most common HPV types were restricted to HPV16/18/45, accounting for 98.3% of all HPV-positive ADC. There were variations in HPV prevalence and ADC type-distribution by country. Age at diagnosis differed by ADC subtype, with usual-type diagnosed in younger women (median: 43 years) compared to rarer subtypes (medians between 57 and 66 years). Moreover, HPV-positive ADC cases were younger than HPV-negative ADC. The six years difference in median age for women with AIS compared to those with usual-type ADC suggests that cytological screening for AIS may be suboptimal. Since the great majority of CGN are HPV16/18/45-positive, the incorporation of prophylactic vaccination and HPV testing in cervical cancer screening are important prevention strategies. Our results suggest that special attention should be given to certain rarer ADC subtypes as most appear to be unrelated to HPV.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Adenosquamous/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Adenosquamous/virology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Humans , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Young Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To study diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, outcomes, and follow-up in a large series of women with adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the uterine cervix and investigate if human papillomavirus (HPV) typing among women with negative cytology reports would have helped with early AIS detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of 132 AIS cases diagnosed between 1989 and 2012 were retrieved. Clinical and pathological data were reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: Mean age at diagnosis was 37 years. Seventy-two percent (n = 95) of all patients were asymptomatic; diagnosis was established using cytology and biopsy. Primary treatment for 124 patents was cold knife cone or loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). Positive margins were found in 18% of those women treated with CKC versus 40% in those treated with LEEP. The mean follow-up time was 62 months (range, 2-217 months; median, 46 months). Three recurrences were found after conservative treatment in 86 patients. High-risk HPV (hrHPV) positivity was detected in 115 (96%) of 120 patients, with HPV-18 being the most commonly occurring subtype (51%). CONCLUSIONS: There is a small risk of relapse after conservative therapy with cold knife cone or LEEP when resection margins are negative in women with AIS. Patients should be given the options of hysterectomy or conservative therapy with strict follow-up.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma in Situ/surgery , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/virology , Adult , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Female , Human papillomavirus 18/isolation & purification , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Netherlands/epidemiology , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Registries , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Women's HealthABSTRACT
Two commercial HPV tests target the same 65 bp fragment of the human papillomavirus genome (designated SPF10): the original HPV SPF10 PCR-DEIA-LiPA25 system, version 1, (LiPA25) and the INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra (INNO-LiPA). The original SPF10 LiPA25 system was designed to have high analytical sensitivity and applied in HPV vaccine and epidemiology studies worldwide. But due to apparent similarities, this test can be easily confused with INNO-LiPA, a more recent assay of which the intended use, i.e., epidemiological or clinical, is currently unclear. The aim was to compare the analytical sensitivity of SPF10 LiPA25 to that of INNO-LiPA on the level of general HPV detection and genotyping. HPV testing by both assays was performed on the same DNA isolated from cervical swab (n = 365) and biopsy (n = 42) specimens. In cervical swabs, SPF10 LiPA25 and INNO-LiPA identified 35.3% and 29.3% multiple infections, 52.6% and 51.5% single infections, and no HPV type in 12.1% and 19.2%, respectively. Genotyping results were 64.7% identical, 26.0% compatible and 9.3% discordant between both methods. SPF10 LiPA25 detected significantly more genotypes (p < 0.001). The higher analytical sensitivity of SPF10 LiPA25 was confirmed by the MPTS123 genotyping assay. HPV positivity by the general probes in SPF10 DEIA was significantly higher (87.9%) than by those on INNO-LiPA (77.0%) (kappa = 0.592, p < 0.001). In cervical biopsies, SPF10 LiPA25 and INNO-LiPA identified 21.4% and 9.5% multiple types, 76.2% and 81.0% single types, and no type in 2.4% and 9.5%, respectively. Between both tests, the identification of genotypes was 76.3% identical, 14.3% compatible and 9.5% discordant. Overall, significantly more genotypes were detected by SPF10 LiPA25 (kappa = 0.853, p = 0.022). HPV positivity was higher by the SPF10 DEIA (97.6%) than by the INNO-LiPA strip (92.9%). These results demonstrate that SPF10 LiPA25 is more suitable for HPV genotyping in epidemiologic and vaccine-related studies, due to its higher analytical sensitivity.