ABSTRACT
Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) infections are a common cause of severe diarrheal illness in low- and middle-income countries. The live-attenuated ACE527 ETEC vaccine, adjuvanted with double mutant heat-labile toxin (dmLT), affords clear but partial protection against ETEC challenge in human volunteers. Comparatively, initial wild-type ETEC challenge completely protects against severe diarrhea on homologous re-challenge. To investigate determinants of protection, vaccine antigen content was compared to wild-type ETEC, and proteome microarrays were used to assess immune responses following vaccination and ETEC challenge. Although molecular interrogation of the vaccine confirmed expression of targeted canonical antigens, relative to wild-type ETEC, vaccine strains were deficient in production of flagellar antigens, immotile, and lacked production of the EtpA adhesin. Similarly, vaccination ± dmLT elicited responses to targeted canonical antigens, but relative to wild-type challenge, vaccine responses to some potentially protective non-canonical antigens including EtpA and the YghJ metalloprotease were diminished or absent. These studies highlight important differences in vaccine and wild-type ETEC antigen content and call attention to distinct immunologic signatures that could inform investigation of correlates of protection, and guide vaccine antigen selection for these pathogens of global importance.
ABSTRACT
Background: Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) is a major cause of diarrheal illness in the developing world. Enterotoxigenic E coli vaccinology has been challenged by genetic diversity and heterogeneity of canonical antigens. Examination of the antigenic breadth of immune responses associated with protective immunity could afford new avenues for vaccine development. Methods: Antibody lymphocyte supernatants (ALS) and sera from 20 naive human volunteers challenged with ETEC strain H10407 and from 10 volunteers rechallenged 4-6 weeks later with the same strain (9 of whom were completely protected on rechallenge) were tested against ETEC proteome microarrays containing 957 antigens. Results: Enterotoxigenic E coli challenge stimulated robust serum and mucosal (ALS) responses to canonical vaccine antigens (CFA/I, and the B subunit of LT) as well as a small number of antigens not presently targeted in ETEC vaccines. These included pathovar-specific secreted proteins (EtpA, EatA) as well as highly conserved E coli antigens including YghJ, flagellin, and pertactin-like autotransporter proteins, all of which have previously afforded protection against ETEC infection in preclinical studies. Conclusions: Taken together, studies reported here suggest that immune responses after ETEC infection involve traditional vaccine targets as well as a select number of more recently identified protein antigens that could offer additional avenues for vaccine development for these pathogens.
