Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy in Nonmetastatic Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Pooled Meta-analysis to Determine the Preferred Regimen.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) vs dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (ddMVAC) before radical cystectomy improves overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and pathologic complete response (pCR) for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer with secondary analyses of pathological downstaging and toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis identified studies of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with neoadjuvant GC compared to ddMVAC from PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE. Random-effect models for pooled log-transformed hazard ratios (HR) for OS and PFS and pooled odds ratios for pCR and downstaging were developed using the generic inverse variance method and Mantel-Haenszel method, respectively. RESULTS: Ten studies were identified (4 OS, 2 PFS, and 6 pCR clinical endpoints). Neoadjuvant ddMVAC improved OS (HR 0.71 [95% confidence intervals 0.56; 0.90]), PFS (HR 0.76 [95% confidence intervals 0.60; 0.97]), and pathological downstaging (odds ratio 1.34 [95% confidence interval 1.01; 1.78]) as compared to GC. There was no significant difference between regimens for pCR rates (odds ratio 1.38 [95% confidence interval 0.90; 2.12]). Treatment toxicity was greater with ddMVAC. Limitations result from differences in number of ddMVAC cycles and patient selection between studies. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant ddMVAC is associated with improved OS and PFS vs gemcitabine/cisplatin for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer before radical cystectomy. Although rates of pathological complete response were not significantly different, pathological downstaging correlated with OS. ddMVAC should be preferred over gemcitabine/cisplatin for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who can tolerate its greater toxicity.

Investigating the Impact of Tumor Biology and Social Determinants on Time to Diagnosis and Stage at Presentation of Wilms Tumor.

Delays in diagnosis and time to diagnosis generally are used interchangeably in cancer disparity research, but these terms may have important differences. Although these terms are related, we hypothesize that time to diagnosis is determined by the aggressiveness of the tumor based on intrinsic factors such as tumor biology, whereas delays in diagnosis are caused by extrinsic factors such as socioeconomic status, leading to presentation at higher stage of disease due to barriers of care. We conducted a retrospective study of 306 patients diagnosed with Wilms tumor at Children's Hospital Colorado between 1971 and 2016 identifying patient barriers as extrinsic markers and using unfavorable histology and loss of heterozygosity as markers of aggressive tumor biology. Multivariable logistic regression was performed. Patients with Medicaid were more likely to present greater than 4 days after initial symptoms compared to those with private insurance, and those with housing concerns were more likely to be diagnosed greater than 9 days from initial symptoms. Tumor biology was noted to be associated with higher stage at diagnosis, but patient barriers were not. These findings suggest the interplay between tumor biology, patient barriers, diagnostic timing, and stage at diagnosis is more complex, multifactorial, and in need of further study.