Polyploids increase overall diversity despite higher turnover than diploids in the Brassicaceae.

Although polyploidy is widespread across the plant Tree of Life, its long-term evolutionary significance is still poorly understood. Here, we examine the effects of polyploidy in explaining the large-scale evolutionary patterns within angiosperms by focusing on a single family exhibiting extensive interspecific variation in chromosome numbers. We inferred ploidy from haploid chromosome numbers for 80% of species in the most comprehensive species-level chronogram for the Brassicaceae. After evaluating a total of 94 phylogenetic models of diversification, we found that ploidy influences diversification rates across the Brassicaceae. We also found that despite diversifying at a similar rate to diploids, polyploids have played a significant role in driving present-day differences in species richness among clades. Overall, in addition to highlighting the complexity in the evolutionary consequences of polyploidy, our results suggest that rare successful polyploids persist while significantly contributing to the long-term evolution of clades. Our findings further indicate that polyploidy has played a major role in driving the long-term evolution of the Brassicaceae and highlight the potential of polyploidy in shaping present-day diversity patterns across the plant Tree of Life.

Autopolyploid lineage shows climatic niche expansion but not divergence in Arabidopsis arenosa.

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Successful establishment of neopolyploids, and therefore polyploid speciation, is thought to be contingent on environmental niche shifts from their progenitors. We explore this niche shift hypothesis in the obligate outcrosser Arabidopsis arenosa complex, which includes diploid and recently formed autotetraploid populations. METHODS: To characterize the climatic niches for both cytotypes in Arabidopsis arenosa, we first gathered climatic data from localities with known ploidy types. We then estimated the climatic niches for diploids and autotetraploids and calculated niche overlap. Using this niche overlap statistic, we tested for niche equivalency and similarity. We explored differences in niches by estimating and comparing niche optimum and breadth and then calculated indices of niche expansion and unfilling. KEY RESULTS: Climatic niche overlap between diploids and autotetraploids is substantial. Although the two niche models are not significantly divergent, they are not identical as they differ in both optimum and breadth along two environmental gradients. Autotetraploids fill nearly the entire niche space of diploids and have expanded into novel environments. CONCLUSIONS: We find climatic niche expansion but not divergence, together with a moderate change in the niche optimum, in the autotetraploid lineage of Arabidopsis arenosa. These results indicate that the climatic niche shift hypothesis alone cannot explain the coexistence of tetraploid and diploid cytotypes.

Genomic Signatures of Reinforcement.

Reinforcement is the process by which selection against hybridization increases reproductive isolation between taxa. Much research has focused on demonstrating the existence of reinforcement, yet relatively little is known about the genetic basis of reinforcement or the evolutionary conditions under which reinforcement can occur. Inspired by reinforcement's characteristic phenotypic pattern of reproductive trait divergence in sympatry but not in allopatry, we discuss whether reinforcement also leaves a distinct genomic pattern. First, we describe three patterns of genetic variation we expect as a consequence of reinforcement. Then, we discuss a set of alternative processes and complicating factors that may make the identification of reinforcement at the genomic level difficult. Finally, we consider how genomic analyses can be leveraged to inform if and to what extent reinforcement evolved in the face of gene flow between sympatric lineages and between allopatric and sympatric populations of the same lineage. Our major goals are to understand if genome scans for particular patterns of genetic variation could identify reinforcement, isolate the genetic basis of reinforcement, or infer the conditions under which reinforcement evolved.