ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Visual rating of medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) is often performed in conjunction with dementia workup. Most prior studies involved patients with known or probable Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study investigated the validity and reliability of MTA in a memory clinic population. METHODS: MTA was rated in 752 MRI examinations, of which 105 were performed in cognitively healthy participants (CH), 184 in participants with subjective cognitive impairment, 249 in subjects with mild cognitive impairment, and 214 in patients with dementia, including AD, subcortical vascular dementia and mixed dementia. Hippocampal volumes, measured manually or using FreeSurfer, were available in the majority of cases. Intra- and interrater reliability was tested using Cohen's weighted kappa. Correlation between MTA and quantitative hippocampal measurements was ascertained with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Moreover, diagnostic ability of MTA was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and suitable, age-dependent MTA thresholds were determined. RESULTS: Rater agreement was moderate to substantial. MTA correlation with quantitative volumetric methods ranged from -0.20 (p< 0.05) to -0.68 (p < 0.001) depending on the quantitative method used. Both MTA and FreeSurfer are able to distinguish dementia subgroups from CH. Suggested age-dependent MTA thresholds are 1 for the age group below 75 years and 1.5 for the age group 75 years and older. CONCLUSIONS: MTA can be considered a valid marker of medial temporal lobe atrophy and may thus be valuable in the assessment of patients with cognitive impairment, even in a heterogeneous patient population.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Cognitive Dysfunction , Temporal Lobe , Alzheimer Disease/diagnostic imaging , Alzheimer Disease/pathology , Atrophy/pathology , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnostic imaging , Cognitive Dysfunction/pathology , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Reproducibility of Results , Temporal Lobe/diagnostic imaging , Temporal Lobe/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Research has shown that mixed dementia is more common than previously believed but little is known of its early stages. OBJECTIVE: To examine if incipient mixed dementia can be differentiated from incipient Alzheimer's disease (AD) and subcortical ischemic vascular dementia (SVD) using neuropsychological tests, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) markers, and magnetic resonance imaging markers. METHODS: We included 493 patients and controls from the Gothenburg MCI study and used the dementia groups for marker selection (CSF total-tau (T-tau), phospho-tau (P-tau), and amyloid-ß42 (Aß42), 11 neuropsychological tests, and 92 regional brain volumes) and to obtain cut-off values which were then applied to the MCI groups. RESULTS: Incipient mixed dementia was best differentiated from incipient AD by the Word fluency F-A-S test and the Trail making test A. CSF T-tau, P-tau, and Aß42 differentiated incipient mixed dementia from incipient SVD. CONCLUSION: Incipient mixed dementia is characterized by an AD-like biomarker profile and an SVD-like cognitive profile. Incipient mixed dementia can be separated from incipient AD and incipient SVD using CSF markers and cognitive testing.