Robust Significance Analysis of Microarrays by Minimum ß-Divergence Method.

Identification of differentially expressed (DE) genes with two or more conditions is an important task for discovery of few biomarker genes. Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) is a popular statistical approach for identification of DE genes for both small- and large-sample cases. However, it is sensitive to outlying gene expressions and produces low power in presence of outliers. Therefore, in this paper, an attempt is made to robustify the SAM approach using the minimum ß-divergence estimators instead of the maximum likelihood estimators of the parameters. We demonstrated the performance of the proposed method in a comparison of some other popular statistical methods such as ANOVA, SAM, LIMMA, KW, EBarrays, GaGa, and BRIDGE using both simulated and real gene expression datasets. We observe that all methods show good and almost equal performance in absence of outliers for the large-sample cases, while in the small-sample cases only three methods (SAM, LIMMA, and proposed) show almost equal and better performance than others with two or more conditions. However, in the presence of outliers, on an average, only the proposed method performs better than others for both small- and large-sample cases with each condition.

A 19-Gene expression signature as a predictor of survival in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Histopathological assessment has a low potential to predict clinical outcome in patients with the same stage of colorectal cancer. More specific and sensitive biomarkers to determine patients' survival are needed. We aimed to determine gene expression signatures as reliable prognostic marker that could predict survival of colorectal cancer patients with Dukes' B and C. METHODS: We examined microarray gene expression profiles of 78 archived tissues of patients with Dukes' B and C using the Illumina DASL assay. The gene expression data were analyzed using the GeneSpring software and R programming. RESULTS: The outliers were detected and replaced with randomly chosen genes from the 90 % confidence interval of the robust mean for each group. We performed three statistical methods (SAM, LIMMA and t-test) to identify significant genes. There were 19 significant common genes identified from microarray data that have been permutated 100 times namely NOTCH2, ITPRIP, FRMD6, GFRA4, OSBPL9, CPXCR1, SORCS2, PDC, C12orf66, SLC38A9, OR10H5, TRIP13, MRPL52, DUSP21, BRCA1, ELTD1, SPG7, LASS6 and DUOX2. This 19-gene signature was able to significantly predict the survival of patients with colorectal cancer compared to the conventional Dukes' classification in both training and test sets (p < 0.05). The performance of this signature was further validated as a significant independent predictor of survival using patient cohorts from Australia (n = 185), USA (n = 114), Denmark (n = 37) and Norway (n = 95) (p < 0.05). Validation using quantitative PCR confirmed similar expression pattern for the six selected genes. CONCLUSION: Profiling of these 19 genes may provide a more accurate method to predict survival of patients with colorectal cancer and assist in identifying patients who require more intensive treatment.