ABSTRACT
This study evaluated and compared the sensitivity profile of routine cell culture, nested VP1 amplification and one step real time RT PCR for Enteroviruses. Serially diluted spiked samples of four model viruses (EV71, CVA16, CVB5 and PV1) and 32 true positive samples including Poliovirus (PV1 & PV3), Coxsackie virus (CVB5, CVB3, CVB1 & CVA4, 10, 16), Echovirus (Echo 6, 7, 11, 13, 18, 25 & 30) and Enterovirus 71 (E71), and 32 true negative stool samples were subjected to cell culture, nested RT PCR and one step real time RT PCR. The result of sensitivity test indicated superior sensitivity with one step real time RT PCR (75 %, 24/32) against cell culture (71.9 %, 23/32) and nested RT PCR (65.6 %, 21/32). The most specific test was cell culture (100 %, 32/32), followed by nested RT PCR (96.9 %, 31/32). Positive predictive values were 100 %: 23/23, 95.5 %; 21/22 and 88.9 %; 24/27, for cell culture, nested RT PCR and one step real time RT PCR, respectively, and one step real time RT PCR had the highest negative predictive value (78.4 %, 29/37). Overall result indicate relatively high analytical sensitivity with all the tests, suggesting superior performance by cell culture. Therefore, cell culture is the gold standard. However, considering intensive nature of cell cultures and prolong window for results, it is wise to consider one step real time RT PCR in routine diagnosis for its added advantages. Meanwhile, selecting a combination of tests can maximize detection, depending on the laboratory strength.
