EVO100 prevents chlamydia and gonorrhea in women at high risk of infection.

BACKGROUND: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, rates of infection for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae are increasing in the United States. EVO100 is an investigational antimicrobial, pH-modulating, vaginal gel with active ingredients L-lactic acid, citric acid, and potassium bitartrate that is being evaluated for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this phase 2B/3 study was to assess the efficacy and safety of EVO100 for the prevention of chlamydia and gonorrhea. STUDY DESIGN: AMPREVENCE was a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter study based in the United States conducted over approximately 16 weeks in women at the age of 18 to 45 years who were at risk of urogenital chlamydia and gonorrhea infection. Enrolled women had been diagnosed as having and treated for chlamydia or gonorrhea ≤16 weeks before enrollment. Women received either EVO100 or placebo vaginal gel and were instructed to apply the study drug immediately before or up to 1 hour before each act of vaginal sexual intercourse. The primary and secondary endpoints were the prevention of urogenital chlamydia and gonorrhea, respectively. Exploratory outcomes include women's overall satisfaction with EVO100. RESULTS: In total, 860 women were randomized 1:1 to receive EVO100 (n=426) or placebo (n=434), and 764 women (EVO100, n=376; placebo, n=388) were documented as using the study drug at least once. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment arms. Overall, women had a mean age of 27.7 years (standard deviation, 6.9) and body mass index of 28.9 kg/m2 (standard deviation, 8.0). Most women were of White (54.3% [467 of 860]) or African American (41.6% [358 of 860]) race and of non-Hispanic/Latina ethnicity (67.1% [577 of 860]). The chlamydia infection rate in EVO100 users was 4.8% (14 of 289) compared with 9.7% (28 of 290) among placebo users (P=.0256), representing a relative risk reduction of 50%. For gonorrhea, the infection rate was 0.7% (2 of 280) in the EVO100 arm compared with 3.2% (9 of 277) in the placebo arm (P=.0316), representing a relative risk reduction of 78%. Increased efficacy was observed with increased adherence, and chlamydia infection rates were significantly reduced with increased adherence in the EVO100 group compared with placebo. Across both arms, there were similar rates of all-cause adverse events (EVO100, 21.3% [80 of 376]; placebo, 20.4% [79 of 388]) and treatment-related adverse events (EVO100, 7.2% [27 of 376]; placebo, 7.5% [29 of 388]). The most common adverse events in the EVO100 arm were vulvovaginal candidiasis (5.1% [19 of 376]), vaginal discharge (3.2% [12 of 376]), and urinary tract infection (3.2% [12 of 376]) and, in the placebo arm, bacterial vaginosis (4.6% [18 of 388]), urinary tract infection (2.6% [10 of 388]), and vaginal discharge (2.6% [10 of 388]). Few women discontinued owing to adverse events in either arm (EVO100, 1.1% [4 of 376]; placebo, 1.5% [6 of 388]). No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. Most EVO100 users (88%) were satisfied or very satisfied with EVO100 after 16 weeks of use. CONCLUSION: EVO100 significantly reduced the risk of chlamydia and gonorrhea infections in women at high risk of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection and was well tolerated, with observed adverse events consistent with its known safety profile.

Non-invasive early detection of malignant pulmonary nodules by FISH-based sputum test.

BACKGROUND: Early detection decreases lung cancer mortality. The Target-FISH Lung Cancer Detection (LCD) Test is a non-invasive test designed to detect chromosomal changes (deletion or amplification) via Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) in sputum specimens from persons suspected of having lung cancer. We evaluated the performance of the LCD test in patients with highly suspicious pulmonary nodules who were scheduled for a biopsy procedure. METHODS: Induced sputum was collected from patients who were scheduled for biopsy of a solitary pulmonary nodule (0.8-3 cm) in one of 6 tertiary medical centers in the US and Israel. The lung cancer detection (LCD) Test combined sputum cytology and Target-FISH analysis on the same target cells and the results were compared to the pathology. Participants with non-surgical negative biopsy results were followed for 2 years to determine their final diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 173 participants who were evaluated, 112 were available for analysis. Overall, the LCD test had a sensitivity of 85.5% (95% CI, 76.1-92.3), specificity of 69% (95% CI, 49.2-84.7) and an accuracy of 81.3% (95% CI, 72.8-88). The positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were 88.8% and 62.5%, respectively. The LCD test was positive in 9 of 11 lung cancer patients who had an initial negative biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients with highly suspicious lung nodules, the LCD test is a non-invasive option with good sensitivity and a high positive predictive value. A positive LCD test reinforces the need to aggressively pursue a definitive diagnosis of suspicious nodules.

Understanding United States Investigational Device Exemption Studies-Clinical Relevance and Importance for Healthcare Economics.

INTRODUCTION: The US Food and Drug Administration allows a previously unapproved device to be used clinically to collect safety and effectiveness data under their Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) category. The process usually falls under 3 different trial categories: noninferiority, equivalency, and superiority. To confidently inform our patients, understanding the basic concepts of these trials is paramount. The purpose of this manuscript was to provide a comprehensive review of these topics using recently published IDE trials and economic analyses of cervical total disc replacement as illustrative examples. CASE STUDY MOBI-C ARTIFICIAL CERVICAL DISC: In 2006, an IDE was initiated to study the safety and effectiveness of total disc replacement controlled against the standard of care, anterior cervical discectomy, and fusion. Under the IDE, randomized controlled trials comparing both 1 and 2 level cervical disease were completed. The sponsor designed the initial trial as noninferiority; however, using adaptive methodology, superiority could be claimed in the 2-level investigation. REVIEWING HEALTHCARE ECONOMICS: Healthcare economics are critical in medical decision making and reimbursement practices. Once both cost- and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) are known for each patient, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is calculated. Willingness-to-pay is controversial, but a commonly cited guideline considers interventions costing below 20 000 $/QALY strongly cost effective and more than 100 000 $/QALY as not cost effective. CONCLUSION: While large Food and Drug Administration IDE studies are often besieged by complex statistical considerations and calculations, it is fundamentally important that clinicians understand at least the terminology and basic concepts on a practical level.