Therapists' and patients' experiences of using patients' self-reported data in ongoing psychotherapy processes-A systematic review and meta-analysis of qualitative studies.

OBJECTIVE: Using patient-generated quantitative data in psychotherapy (feedback) appears to enhance treatment outcome, but there is variability in its effect. Different ways and reasons to implement routine outcome measurement might explain such variability. The goal of this review is to address the insufficient knowledge on how these data are used by therapists and patients. METHODS: The present study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of qualitative reports of therapists' and patients' experiences using patient-generated quantitative data during ongoing psychotherapy. RESULTS: Four main categories of use were identified: (1) uses of patients' self-reported data as nomothetic/objective markers for assessment, process monitoring, and treatment planning; (2) intrapersonal uses that enhance self-awareness, initiate reflection, and influence patients' mood or responses; (3) uses that prompt interactional processes by facilitating communication, supporting exploration, creating ownership in patients, changing treatment focus, enhancing therapeutic alliance, or disturbing the psychotherapy process; and (4) patients responding for specific purposes due to uncertainty and interpersonal motives, or strategic responding to achieve a desired result. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that patient-reported data, when used in active psychotherapy, is very clearly not just an objective measurement of client functioning: the inclusion of patient-data has the potential to influence psychotherapy in numerous ways.

Living the dream - but not without hardship: stories about self-directed weight transformation from severe obesity.

DESIGN: In-depth interviews were conducted with eight women and two men, aged 27 to 59 years, who had carried out self-directed WL from SO for 5 years or more. TWO THEMES RAN ACROSS THE STORIES: fear of weight-regain, and food and emotion. We performed a case-based narrative analysis of especially rich interviews that illustrate these. Results pointed to persistently cultivating new competencies, establishing new eating habits, re-establishing old physical-training habits, and forming new relational bonds. Participants reinvented themselves and their lives. However, the stories are not all about transformation, but also about new and old health problems. CONCLUSION: The study directs attention to 'different obesities', not only to initial weight from which WL takes place, but also linked to the experiential horizons that the persons embody from childhood on. Furthermore, there was no way back in the present stories, always haunted in the wake of the lost weight. A double burden imposed on the person with obesity related to meta-stories in society deepens the understanding of this imperative: being vulnerable health-wise and exposed to stigmatization.

A review of systematic reviews on the effects of patient-reported outcome monitoring with clinical feedback systems on health-related quality of life-implications for a novel technology in obesity treatment.

Patient-reported outcome monitoring with clinical feedback systems (PRO/CFS) has been employed in many disease states to measure and improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Exploring the role of PRO/CFS in treatment for obesity may prove valuable. Systematic reviews were summarized to determine the effectiveness of PRO/CFS on HRQOL in any disease area. Primary studies evaluating the effect of PRO/CFS on HRQOL in treatment for obesity were also considered for inclusion. Systematic searches were performed in The Cochrane Library, PROSPERO, Epistemonikos, HTA, DARE, CINAHL, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, BMJ Clinical Evidence, PDQ-Evidence and PubPsych. Two reviewers independently screened references until final inclusion and critically appraised included reviews using PRISMA checklist. Five systematic reviews and no primary studies met inclusion criteria. Although results were inconsistent, effectiveness of PRO/CFS on HRQOL was demonstrated in some diseases/treatments (e.g. psychiatric treatment; symptom burden in cancer treatment). No trials using PRO/CFS in treatment for obesity were identified. In some trials, PRO/CFS was not fully integrated into consultations, thereby PRO/CFS was not extensively studied. General effectiveness of PRO/CFS on HRQOL is inconclusive due to heterogeneous and statistically insignificant findings, and lack of stringency in conceptualization and execution of PRO/CFS. There are no data relevant to treatment for obesity. Future studies should use rigorous methodology to examine the effectiveness of PRO/CFS in treatment for obesity.