The long-term impact of ferritin level on treatment and complications of type 2 diabetes.

AIM: To investigate if high-serum ferritin has long-term impact on response to treatment and the development of diabetic complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We analysed the record of 90 consecutive type 2 diabetic subjects who had serum ferritin level determined soon after diagnosis of diabetes and who also had long-term follow-up data. RESULTS: Patients with higher serum ferritin level had slightly worse triglyceride, blood pressure and liver enzyme levels at the end of follow up. However, ferritin level had no impact on the initial or final requirements for diabetic medication and the development of diabetic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Although elevated serum ferritin is a marker of insulin resistance and chronic inflammation, it is not necessarily a bad prognostic indicator that should affect the clinician's approach to management.

Augmentation of central arterial pressure in Type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: Aortic systolic blood pressure has been shown to be augmented in Type 1 diabetes, indicative of more rapid pulse wave reflection due to increased arterial stiffness. This abnormality is more pronounced in diabetic males. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of diabetes on augmentation of aortic systolic pressure in subjects with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Radial artery pressure waveforms were obtained non-invasively by applanation tonometry. A central aortic waveform can be derived using a transfer function obtained from previous studies during cardiac catheterization. A total of 88 subjects with Type 2 diabetes (51 men and 37 women, aged 55.8 years (interquartile range (IR) 49.7-64.1), duration of diabetes 7.5 years (IR 2.4-12.4), HbA1c 7.6% (IR 6.6-8.7)) and 85 controls subjects (40 men and 45 women, aged 55.3 years (IR 44.2-66.4)) were studied. The central aortic waveform allowed determination of the: (i) aortic augmentation index and (ii) subendocardial viability ratio. RESULTS: Similar to Type 1 diabetic subjects, patients with Type 2 diabetes had a significantly higher aortic augmentation index (136.1 +/- 18.0% vs. 128.3 +/- 19.2%, t = 2.8, P = 0.006) and lower subendocardial viability ratio (137.4 +/- 25.0% vs. 155.1 +/- 25.9%; t = 4.6, P = 0.0001) compared with controls. Multivariate analysis identified diabetes as an important determinant of aortic augmentation index (t = 4.0, P = 0.0001). The higher aortic augmentation index was due mainly to the male cohort (t = 2.6; P = 0.01) and was not apparent for females with diabetes (P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Type 2 diabetes is characterized by higher augmentation of aortic systolic pressure and unfavourable ratio of myocardial perfusion to cardiac workload. These results are consistent with increased arterial stiffness. The age-related progression of arterial stiffness is similar in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. Anti-hypertensive agents that reduce wave reflection and augmentation may help to prevent systolic hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy in diabetes.

Administration of ascorbic acid and an aldose reductase inhibitor (tolrestat) in diabetes: effect on urinary albumin excretion.

The important role of ascorbic acid (AA) as an anti-oxidant is particularly relevant in diabetes mellitus where plasma concentrations of AA are reduced. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of treatment with AA or an aldose reductase inhibitor, tolrestat, on AA metabolism and urinary albumin excretion in diabetes. Blood and urine samples were collected at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from 20 diabetic subjects who were randomized into two groups to receive either oral AA 500 mg twice daily or placebo. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures, HbA1c, plasma lipids, urinary albumin, and total glycosaminoglycan excretion were measured at all time points, and heparan sulphate (glycosaminoglycan) was measured at 0 and 12 months. The same parameters, as well as urinary AA excretion, were determined at 0 and 3 months for 16 diabetes subjects receiving 200 mg tolrestat/day. AA treatment increased plasma AA (ANOVA, F ratio = 12.1, p = 0.004) and reduced albumin excretion rate (AER) after 9 months (ANOVA, F ratio = 3.2, p = 0.03), but did not change the other parameters measured. Tolrestat lowered plasma AA (Wilcoxon's signed-rank test, p < 0.05), but did not change AER or the other parameters measured. The ability of AA treatment to decrease AER may be related to changes in extracellular matrix or improvement in oxidative defence mechanism. Unlike the rat model of diabetes, inhibition of aldose reductase did not normalize plasma AA or AER in humans. In fact, tolrestat reduced the plasma AA concentration, a phenomenon which may be due to increased utilization of AA. Dietary supplementation of AA in diabetic subjects may have long-term benefits in attenuating the progression of diabetic complications.

Does insulin therapy have a hypertensive effect in type 2 diabetes?

In this prospective study, the 24-h blood-pressure profile of 12 patients with type 2 diabetes was monitored before, at 6, and at 12 weeks after initiation of insulin therapy, to determine whether commencement of insulin therapy increases blood pressure in these patients. Insulin dosage adjustment was carried out by using a predetermined algorithm according to body weight and degree of hyperglycemia. The mean insulin dosage at 12 weeks was 72.9 +/- 3.9 units/day. This was associated with an increase in systolic blood pressure from 134.6 +/- 4.3 mm Hg to 144.8 +/- 4.5 mm Hg (p = 0.0001), diastolic blood pressure from 71.9 +/- 2.6 mm Hg to 74.9 +/- 2.2 mm Hg (p = 0.0001), and body mass index (BMI) from 27.2 +/- 0.8 kg/m2 to 29.6 +/- 0.8 kg/m2 (p = 0.0001). Multiple regression analysis showed insulin dosage to be a significant independent factor (p = 0.0003) accounting for 63% of the variance in blood pressure change after adjusting for age, diastolic blood pressure, and base HbA1c. We conclude that insulin therapy may have a deleterious effect on blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, in the clinical setting, it is difficult to isolate this from the confounding effect of weight gain.

Better glycaemic control and risk reduction of diabetic complications in Type 2 diabetes: comparison with the DCCT.

OBJECTIVE: To construct dose response curves relating the development of diabetic complications (retinopathy and microalbuminuria) to mean glycaemic exposure in a cohort of Type 2 patients followed over a period of several years. This allows a comparison with similar data on Type 1 subjects reported by the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and provides a rational basis for deciding what levels of glycaemic control should be aimed for in advising individual patients and in setting guidelines for conducting health services. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was an analysis of data prospectively collected in our computerized data base for Type 2 patients who attended and were followed up at the Complications Assessment Service of our Diabetes Center. The initial development of retinopathy and microalbuminuria was analyzed with respect to the mean HbA1c during the follow up period. Statistical procedures identical to those employed in the DCCT were used to construct the dose response curve. RESULTS: A smooth relationship between the development of retinopathy with increasing hyperglycaemia was found. For every 10% decrease in HbA1c, there was a 24%) (confidence interval (CI): 16-32) reduction in relative risk, about 2/3 of that reported for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients. The relationship between microalbuminuria and HbAc was more linear and less steep with a relative risk reduction of 9% (CI: -2-19%) for any 10% fall in HbA1c, about 1/3 of that reported for IDDM subjects. No threshold of HbA1c can be found for the relative risk of developing complications. However, more cases of complications are prevented by the same degree of improvement in glycaemic control at higher levels of HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS: The development of diabetic retinopathy in Type 2 subjects is also related to the magnitude of hyperglycaemia although the degree of dependence is less than that in Type 1. Glycaemic control has less influence on microalbuminuria in Type 2. In terms of relative risk, no threshold of 'safe HbA1c' can be found but in absolute terms more cases of diabetic complications can be prevented by improving the glycaemic control of the very hyperglycaemic patients.

Why does ethnicity affect prevalence of gestational diabetes? The underwater volcano theory.

To study why gestational diabetes (GDM) is more common in some ethnic groups than others, we tested the hypothesis that GDM is more common in people who are temporally closer to developing non-insulin-dependent (Type 2) diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The prevalence of GDM and the mean age of affected women in each major ethnic group were determined. From our database of NIDDM 6052 patients, the mean age of onset in each ethnic gorup was calculated and the mean difference between age of developing GDM and age of developing NIDDM derived (NIDDM-GDM age gap). This age gap was used to adjust for the susceptibility to GDM of each group. The overall prevalence of GDM was 6.7% (CI 6.0%-7.4%). In Anglo-Celtic women it was 3.0% (CI 2.3%-3.7%). For the other ethnic groups the prevalence and odds ratio (OR) were: Chinese (15.0% CI 11.8%-18.2% OR 5.6), Vietnamese (9.6% CI 6.6%-12.5% OR 3.6), Indian (16.7% CI 9.8%-23.5% OR 6.4), Arabic (7.3% CI 4.6%-10.1% OR 2.5) and Aborigines (10.1% CI 3.8%-16.4% OR 3.7). The OR for susceptibility to GDM did not change after adjustment for BMI and maternal age and it correlated significantly with the NIDDM-GDM age gap (r = -0.85; p = 0.03). However, it fell substantially after adjustment for NIDDM-GDM age gap. For women of different ethnic origins there is a difference in the time gap between their pregnancies and the time at which they would on average be expected to develop diabetes. This difference may be an important factor underlying the higher prevalence of GDM in some ethnic populations.

Indapamide is as effective as captopril in the control of microalbuminuria in diabetes.

Microalbuminuria is a predictor of overt diabetic nephropathy and macrovascular disease. Thirty-one diabetic patients with persistent urinary albumin excretion rate (AER) of 20-200 mu g min-1 were randomised to receive indapamide 2.5 mg or captopril 37.5 mg daily for 12 weeks. After a 4-week washout, patients received the alternate agent for 12 weeks. Resting blood pressure (BP), AER, cholesterol, triglycerides, and HbA1c were measured at baseline, after 6 and 12 weeks of each treatment, and after a 4-week washout period following each treatment arm. Results from patients who completed at least one treatment arm were analysed by repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). AER (median value and interquartile range) decreased significantly from baseline after treatment with indapamide and captopril [60(27-106) vs. 40(14-112) and 33(17-100); p < 0.005], but there was no difference between the effects of the two agents. Mean systolic BP (SBP) was also significantly reduced with treatment, and no difference was noted between the effects of the two agents. No correlation between changes in AER and SBP was noted with either agent. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP), cholesterol, triglycerides, and HbA1c did not change during the study. These results suggest that indapamide is an effective alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in the treatment of diabetic patients with microalbuminuria.

Comparative effects of indapamide and captopril on blood pressure and albumin excretion rate in diabetic microalbuminuria.

Nephropathy affects about one third of diabetic patients and its onset can be predicted almost a decade in advance by detecting small quantities of albumin in the urine (microalbuminuria). Thus, detection of proteinuria or microalbuminuria in diabetic patients carries important implications and merits intervention. Strategies for delaying the relentless progression of microalbuminuria to diabetic nephropathy and ultimately end-stage renal failure are focused on improving glycemic control and reducing blood pressure. Studies with beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, diuretics, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in hypertensive diabetics with microalbuminuria have shown a significant reduction in urinary albumin excretion rates (AER), with effective lowering of blood pressure. In a crossover study, we compared the effects of captopril versus indapamide as monotherapy for 12 weeks on AER and blood pressure in 31 diabetic patients with established microalbuminuria. The 2 drugs were equally effective in reducing AER (average reduction 30-40%) and had comparable antihypertensive effects.

Obese patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled by insulin and metformin: effects of adjunctive dexfenfluramine therapy on glycaemic control.

Dexfenfluramine is well known for its weight reducing action and has been reported to improve glycaemic control in obese Type 2 diabetic patients not adequately controlled on conventional oral hypoglycaemic therapy. In this double-blind placebo-controlled study, 20 obese Type 2 diabetic patients with mean HbA1c of 8.8 +/- 0.5% (normal range 3.5-6.0%), and mean body mass index (BMI) of 34.4 +/- 1.0 kg m-2, who were poorly controlled on insulin (mean dosage 58.0 +/- 6.1 units day-1) were randomized to receive either additional dexfenfluramine or placebo for 12 weeks. Seventeen of these patients were already taking maximum tolerated metformin therapy (mean dosage 1.6 +/- 0.2 g day-1) and the other three were unable to tolerate any at all. At baseline, the dexfenfluramine and placebo groups were similar in all parameters studied. After the 12-week treatment period, median HbA1c had fallen in dexfenfluramine treated patients from 8.5 (interquartile range (IR): 7.5-10.3) to 7.1% (IR: 6.7-7.5; p < 0.02). The fall in HbA1c in individual patients after treatment with dexfenfluramine was strongly associated with weight loss (r = 0.69; p < 0.04), although as a group the changes in weight and BMI were not statistically significant. Placebo was without effect. These results show that in the obese patient with Type 2 diabetes who is poorly controlled despite large daily doses of insulin and metformin, adjunctive dexfenfluramine can improve glycaemic control without exacerbating weight gain.

A single visit diabetes complication assessment service: a complement to diabetes management at the primary care level.

Modern diabetes management emphasizes the early detection and prompt treatment of diabetic complications. However it is difficult to organize comprehensive screening at the primary care level. To address this problem we established a complication assessment service whereby all the major diabetes-specific complications were assessed in a single 3 h visit. A report with results and recommendations was sent to the general practitioner (GP). Being philosophically a complication-specific service, no attempt was made to intervene with metabolic management. This paper describes our experience with the first 743 patients of whom 92% had been referred from GPs. Of the diabetes-specific complications, 22% of patients had one, 5% had two, and 1% had three major complications. Many of the patients were unaware of the presence of these complications. One hundred and three people had attended the service on more than one occasion with an average time between visits of 1.7 years. The results demonstrated that GPs were very good at following a recommendation to refer a patient for ophthalmic assessment (85% of cases) and improving hypertension but were less successful in treating hyperlipidaemia. This service has proven to be an excellent forum for the collection of data and the teaching of health professionals. It is a move away from the traditional format of hospital-based clinics providing comprehensive diabetes management.

The effects of dexfenfluramine on blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Dexfenfluramine has been shown to promote weight loss in overweight people. The present double-blind study was designed to test whether the addition of dexfenfluramine to conventional oral hypoglycaemic treatment would promote weight loss and improve blood glucose control in overweight patients with Type 2 diabetes. The 34 patients studied were randomly assigned to dexfenfluramine or placebo therapy which was added for 12 weeks to their existing treatment regimens of metformin with or without a sulphonylurea. Dexfenfluramine treatment was associated with a significant reduction in weight (98.7 +/- 5.0 (+/- SE) vs 94.9 +/- 5.2 kg; p less than 0.001), BMI (35.0 +/- 1.2 vs 33.6 +/- 1.9 kg m-2; p less than 0.001), HbA1c (7.5 +/- 0.3 vs 6.3 +/- 0.2%; p less than 0.001), fructosamine (313.9 +/- 17.6 vs 274.3 +/- 10.4 mumol l-1; p less than 0.01), systolic (137 +/- 5 vs 128 +/- 6 mmHg; p less than 0.05), and diastolic blood pressure (85 +/- 2 vs 73 +/- 3 mmHg; p less than 0.001). At the end of the study period, the dexfenfluramine treated group had a significantly lower HbA1c (6.3 +/- 0.2 vs 7.2 +/- 0.4; p less than 0.05), fructosamine level (274.3 +/- 10.4 vs 313.3 +/- 16.1 mumol l-1; p less than 0.05) and diastolic blood pressure (73 +/- 3 vs 81 +/- 3 mmHg; p less than 0.03) when compared with the placebo group. In those patients treated with dexfenfluramine, the reduction in HbA1c and blood pressure did not correlate with the decrease in BMI (r = 0.44 and 0.12, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)