ABSTRACT
Resumen Trichophyton benhamiae es un dermatofito zoofílico. Puede causar tinea corporis, tinea faciei y tinea capitis. Se caracteriza por producir lesiones inflamatorias, sobre todo en niños. El objetivo de esta publicación es describir 7 casos clínicos de pacientes pediátricos atendidos entre julio del 2019 y enero del 2020 en nuestra institución. A los pacientes se les solicitó estudio micológico convencional, con posterior confirmación con MALDI-TOF MS y secuencia-ción del ADN ribosomal. Se aisló e identificó T. benhamiae como agente etiológico; el nexo epidemiológico fue el contacto con cobayos. Estas son las primeras descripciones de infecciones causadas por T. benhamiae en Argentina. Al realizar estudios micológicos convencionales, este agente puede confundirse con otros dermatofitos, por lo tanto, se requieren herramientas como MALDI-TOF MS o la secuenciación para llegar a un diagnóstico definitivo. Es importante contar con datos epidemiológicos, como el contacto con mascotas no tradicionales, para una presunción diagnóstica adecuada.
Trichophyton benhamiae is a zoonotic dermatophyte that can cause tinea corporis, tinea faciei and tinea capitis, producing inflammatory lesions, especially in children. In this publication, we describe 7clinical cases of pediatric patients that occurred in our institution between July 2019 and January 2020. All patients underwent a conventional mycological study. The identification of fungi isolates was confirmed by MALDI-TOF MS and sequencing of the ribosomal DNA. T. benhamiae was identified as the etiological agent, whose epidemiological link in all cases was the contact with Guinea pigs. This is the first description of infections caused by T. benhamiae in Argentina. This dermatophyte can be misidentified as other more frequent dermatophytes when performing conventional studies. Molecular technology should be used to reach a definitive diagnosis. It is important to have epidemiological data from patients such as contact with non-traditional pets, especially Guinea pigs, for an adequate presumptive diagnosis of this dermatophytosis.
ABSTRACT
Trichophyton benhamiae is a zoonotic dermatophyte that can cause tinea corporis, tinea faciei and tinea capitis, producing inflammatory lesions, especially in children. In this publication, we describe 7clinical cases of pediatric patients that occurred in our institution between July 2019 and January 2020. All patients underwent a conventional mycological study. The identification of fungi isolates was confirmed by MALDI-TOF MS and sequencing of the ribosomal DNA. T. benhamiae was identified as the etiological agent, whose epidemiological link in all cases was the contact with Guinea pigs. This is the first description of infections caused by T. benhamiae in Argentina. This dermatophyte can be misidentified as other more frequent dermatophytes when performing conventional studies. Molecular technology should be used to reach a definitive diagnosis. It is important to have epidemiological data from patients such as contact with non-traditional pets, especially Guinea pigs, for an adequate presumptive diagnosis of this dermatophytosis.
Subject(s)
Arthrodermataceae , Tinea , Animals , Argentina/epidemiology , Arthrodermataceae/genetics , DNA, Ribosomal , Guinea Pigs , Tinea/diagnosis , Tinea/epidemiology , Tinea/veterinary , Trichophyton/geneticsABSTRACT
The purpose of this randomized, controlled, masked study was to evaluate the effects of latanoprost 0.005% (Xalatan, Pharmacia and Upjohn, Milan, Italy) on the ocular surface in patients with ocular hypertension or primary open-angle glaucoma. The study group included 14 patients who underwent latanoprost 0.005% eye drops once a day in both eyes for 4 months. The control group underwent unpreserved substitute tears eye drops (Aquasalina, Bruschettini, Genoa, Italy) with the same posology and the same concentration of benzalkonium chloride (0.02%). Patients were controlled at 1, 3 and 4 months for symptoms, intraocular pressure, corneal sensitivity (Cochet-Bonnet test) and fluorescein staining. At the same control times, they underwent impression cytology and conjunctival brush cytology. Immunohistochemical techniques were used to detect HLA-DR expression in conjunctival cells. At each control, no significant statistical differences were found between the study and the control group, except for a higher expression of HLA-DR in the latanoprost group (p < 0.001). Since HLA-DR is a marker of ocular surface inflammation, this study suggests that a subclinical inflammatory reaction is present in the ocular surface of patients under latanoprost therapy. The pathway by which the inflammation is stimulated is yet unknown.
