Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ergonomics ; 55(9): 1104-14, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22676341

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to investigate potential associations between an individual's psychophysical maximum acceptable force (MAF) during pushing tasks and biomechanical tissue loads within the lumbar spine. Ten subjects (eight males, two females) pushed a cart with an unknown weight at one push every two minute for a distance of 3.9 m. Two independent variables were investigated, cart control and handle orientation while evaluating their association with the MAF. Dependent variables of hand force and tissue loads for each MAF determination and preceding push trial were assessed using a validated, electromyography-assisted biomechanical model that calculated spinal load distribution throughout the lumbar spine. Results showed no association between spinal loads and the MAF. Only hand forces were associated with the MAF. Therefore, MAFs may be dependent upon tactile sensations from the hands, not the loads on the spine and thus may be unrelated to risk of low back injury. Practitioner Summary: Pushing tasks have become common in manual materials handling (MMH) and these tasks impose different tissue loads compared to lifting tasks. Industry has commonly used the psychophysical tables for job assent and decision of MMH tasks. However, due to the biomechanical complexity of pushing tasks, psychophysics may be misinterpreting risk.


Subject(s)
Low Back Pain/etiology , Lumbosacral Region/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Psychophysics , Task Performance and Analysis , Weight-Bearing/physiology , Analysis of Variance , Biomechanical Phenomena , Electromyography , Ergonomics , Female , Humans , Low Back Pain/psychology , Male , Risk Assessment , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...