Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMJ Open ; 10(9): e037039, 2020 09 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32998921

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Dance is an intrinsically motivating activity that includes social interaction, stimulation through music, the pleasure of moving despite pathology-induced motor limitations, and it also has good perceived benefits among participants. Feeling pleasure while moving is essential to finding the motivation to engage in a rehabilitation programme. It is, therefore, urgent to provide persons in a poststroke situation with motivating physical activity opportunities. Very few studies have examined dance in a stroke context, while it is highly adapted and effective for other chronic conditions.Our primary objective is to assess the effects of dance programme on patients' balance control after stroke. Our secondary objective is to investigate the effects of dance on cognitive function, strength, coordination, functional status, balance confidence, quality of life, motivation and adherence. Our hypothesis is that dance increases balance and motor capacities, and improves poststroke quality of life, adherence and motivation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Forty-eight subjects with stroke in subacute phase will be randomised into two groups: (1) intervention (dance and standard rehabilitation) and (2) control (standard rehabilitation). Before intervention, stroke severity, cognitive abilities and motor capacities will be assessed. Two baseline tests will be planned to evaluate the stability of individuals. Participants will attend a weekly 60-min dance class for 6 weeks. Cognitive and motor functions (balance, lower-limbs strength, coordination and motor level), quality of life (Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale) will be measured at weeks 4 and 6 in both groups. Participant satisfaction with regard to dance will be tested, as well as adherence and adverse effects. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been granted by the Swiss Ethics Committee of the CER Vaud (2019-01467). Outcomes will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04120467.


Subject(s)
Stroke Rehabilitation , Stroke , Cognition , Exercise , Exercise Therapy , Humans , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
2.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 98(8): 1628-1635.e2, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28499657

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of electrically assisted movement therapy (EAMT) in which patients use functional electrical stimulation, modulated by a custom device controlled through the patient's unaffected hand, to produce or assist task-specific upper limb movements, which enables them to engage in intensive goal-oriented training. DESIGN: Randomized, crossover, assessor-blinded, 5-week trial with follow-up at 18 weeks. SETTING: Rehabilitation university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with chronic, severe stroke (N=11; mean age, 47.9y) more than 6 months poststroke (mean time since event, 46.3mo). INTERVENTIONS: Both EAMT and the control intervention (dose-matched, goal-oriented standard care) consisted of 10 sessions of 90 minutes per day, 5 sessions per week, for 2 weeks. After the first 10 sessions, group allocation was crossed over, and patients received a 1-week therapy break before receiving the new treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment for the Upper Extremity, Wolf Motor Function Test, spasticity, and 28-item Motor Activity Log. RESULTS: Forty-four individuals were recruited, of whom 11 were eligible and participated. Five patients received the experimental treatment before standard care, and 6 received standard care before the experimental treatment. EAMT produced higher improvements in the Fugl-Meyer scale than standard care (P<.05). Median improvements were 6.5 Fugl-Meyer points and 1 Fugl-Meyer point after the experimental treatment and standard care, respectively. The improvement was also significant in subjective reports of quality of movement and amount of use of the affected limb during activities of daily living (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: EAMT produces a clinically important impairment reduction in stroke patients with chronic, severe upper limb paresis.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Neural Prostheses , Paresis/rehabilitation , Stroke Rehabilitation/methods , Upper Extremity , Activities of Daily Living , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease , Cross-Over Studies , Electric Stimulation Therapy/instrumentation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Recovery of Function , Severity of Illness Index , Single-Blind Method , Stroke Rehabilitation/instrumentation , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...