Long-term dual antiplatelet therapy and nuisance bleeding: impact on quality of life.

Long term dual antiplatelet therapy (LTDAPT), with ticagrelor 60 mg and low-dose aspirin, is indicated after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) for the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events in high-risk patients with a history of ACS of at least 1 year. LTDAPT had a good tolerability and safety profile, but the risk of TIMI major bleeding was increased. However, even non-significant bleeding may be important because it has an effect on the quality of life and therefore may lead to treatment discontinuation. We, therefore, evaluated patients' experiences with LTDAPT and the impact of nuisance bleeding on quality of life and treatment adherence. We retrospectively reviewed 225 patients in follow-up after ACS with at least one high-risk condition, treated with ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily (after 90 mg twice daily for 12 months). The outpatient follow-up program after hospitalization provides a visit on day 30 after discharge, then after 3 months, continuing with six-monthly checks. We assessed the presence and intensity of bleeding, as well as health-related quality of life (HRQoL), at each visit. The TIMI score was used to determine the severity of the bleeding. Any overt bleeding event that did not meet the major and minor criteria was labeled "minimal" and could be framed as "nuisance bleeding." The HRQoL was assessed by the EuroQol-5 and Dimension (EQ-5D) visual analog scale (VAS) score. Minimal bleedings were present in 49 patients (21%), but only in one case (by decision of the patient) there was a cause for discontinuation of therapy. However, 39 (79%) subjects had asked for opinions on stopping the therapy during the telephone consultation. Factors influencing LTDAPT knowledge included access to medication counselling, engaging with information communicated during medication counselling, and access to timely, relevant and expert information and advice after discharge from the hospital. All adverse events, judged to be "not serious" in trials, may have an effect on the quality of life and therefore may lead to treatment discontinuation. The authors underline the importance of careful outpatient follow-up and ongoing counselling, to check out compliance and possible adverse effect of LTDAPT.

Long term dual antiplatelet therapy after myocardial infarction: retrospective analysis in an outpatient population.

Long term treatment with ticagrelor 60 mg and low-dose aspirin are indicated after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We retrospectively reviewed aggregate data of 187 patients (155 M and 38 F) (mean age 63.8±9 years) in follow up after ACS with at least one high risk condition (Multivessel disease, diabetes, GFR<60 mL/min, history of prior myocardial infarction, age >65 years) treated with ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily (after 90 mg twice daily for 12 months). The results were compared with findings (characteristics of the patients at baseline, outcomes, bleeding) of PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial and Eu Label. The highrisk groups were represented as follows: multivessel disease 105 pts (82%), diabetes 63 pts (33%), GFR< 60 mL/min 27 pts (14%), history of prior MI 33 pts (17%), >65 year aged 85 pts (45%). Treatment was withdrawn in 7 patients: 3 cases showed atrial fibrillation and were placed on oral anticoagulant drugs, one developed intracranial bleeding, in three patients a temporary withdrawal was due to surgery (1 colon polyposis and 2 cases of bladder papilloma). Chest pain without myocardial infarction occurred in 16 patients (revascularization was required in 9 patients). Dyspnea was present in 15 patients, but was not a cause for discontinuation of therapy. Long term treatment with ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg/day showed a favourable benefit/risk profile after ACS.  In this study all patients had been given ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily for 12 months and the 60 mg twice daily dosage was started immediately thereafter, unlike PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial in which it was prescribed within a period ranging from 1 day to 1 year after discontinuation of the 90 mg dose. This makes our results more consistent with current clinical practice. However, a careful outpatient follow-up and constant counseling are mandatory to check out compliance to therapy and adverse side effects.

[Sleep apnea and heart failure: pathophysiology, diagnosis and therapy]. / Apnee notturne e scompenso cardiaco: fisiopatologia, diagnosi e terapia.

Sleep apnea, defined as a pathologic pause in breathing during sleep >10 s, promotes the progression of chronic heart failure and may be a predictor of poor prognosis. It causes, in fact, several mechanical, hemodynamic, chemical and inflammatory changes that negatively compromise cardiovascular homeostasis of heart failure patients. Sleep apnea is recognized as sleep apnea syndrome when specific symptoms, such as sleepiness and headache during the daytime and snoring, are present and is diagnosed with an overnight test called polysomnography. There are two different forms of sleep apnea, central and obstructive. Breathing is interrupted by the loss of respiratory drive and the lack of respiratory effort in the central form, which affects about 40-60% of heart failure patients. In obstructive sleep apnea, breathing stops when throat muscles relax, despite respiratory effort. This form affects about 3% of the general population, while it is present in at least 30% of heart failure patients. The diagnosis of sleep disorders in heart failure becomes very important to help patients adopting lifestyle changes and starting specific therapies to improve quality of life and retard the progression of chronic heart failure.

Effects of AT1 receptor antagonism with candesartan on endothelial function in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease.

Endothelial dysfunction is a major determinant of atherosclerosis and a negative prognostic factor in patients with coronary artery disease and hypertension. Recovery of endothelial dysfunction has been associated with improved prognosis in these patients. The aim of the present study was to verify whether antagonism of angiotensin II AT1 receptors with an angiotensin receptor blocker, candesartan, improved endothelial function in patients with hypertension, stable coronary artery disease, and endothelial dysfunction. We studied 26 patients who were receiving beta-blockers with optimal blood pressure control, in a randomized, double blind study. Patients were randomized to placebo (n=13) or to candesartan 16 mg/d (n=13) for 2 months. Endothelial function was assessed by ultrasound using hyperemic flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery. Mean arterial blood pressure was unchanged in both groups (from 93.3 +/- 9.2 to 93.2 +/- 17.3 mm Hg in the candesartan group and from 101.3 +/- 14.2 to 102.3 +/- 13.9 mm Hg in the placebo group; both P=ns). Maximal blood flow was similar between placebo and candesartan groups at baseline and at the end of the study, whereas flow-mediated dilation significantly increased in the candesartan group (from 5.27% +/- 1.69% to 7.15% +/- 2.67%; P=0.01) but remained unchanged in the placebo group (from 4.49% +/- 1.97% to 5.88% +/- 2.30%; P=ns). AT1 receptor antagonism with candesartan, in addition to b-blocker therapy, improves endothelial function in high-risk hypertensive patients.

Differences in echocardiographic assessment with standard Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging of left ventricular filling pressure in idiopathic and ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: In idiopathic and ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) there are differences in left atrial and ventricular relaxation. We assessed the hypothesis of an influence of these dissimilarities in assessing left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) in these two DCMs by standard Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging. In particular, we focused on early transmitral flow to early diastolic motion velocity of mitral annulus ratio (E/Ea), useful to estimate normal or elevated LVFP. However, when found in intermediate range (8-15), its role is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated 26 patients with ischemic and 21 patients with idiopathic DCM. To validate the echocardiographic estimation of LVFP, a sample (12 patients) underwent LVFP assessment by catheterization. In idiopathic DCM, E/Ea directly related to duration of retrograde pulmonary venous flow (ARd) (r = 0.66 P = 0001). In ischemic DCM E/Ea inversely related only to systolic to diastolic velocity ratio of pulmonary venous flow (S/D) (r =-0.56 P = 0002). After a mean follow up of 6 months, by a second echocardiogram we observed a direct relation between E/Ea and ARd percentage variation (r = 0.52 P = 0.02) in idiopathic DCM group, whereas in the ischemic DCM group there was an inverse relation between E/Ea and S/D percentage variation (r =-0.59 P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, ARd in idiopathic and S/D in ischemic DCM might be used as specific additional information to estimate LVFP when E/Ea falls within intermediate range.