In vitro 'time-to-kill' assay to assess the cidal activity dynamics of current reference drugs against Leishmania donovani and Leishmania infantum.

OBJECTIVES: Despite a continued search for novel antileishmanial drugs, treatment options remain restricted to a few standard drugs, e.g. antimonials, miltefosine, amphotericin B and paromomycin. Although these drugs have now been used for several decades, their mechanism of action still remains partly hypothetical and their dynamics of cidal action and time-to-kill are still poorly documented. METHODS: An in vitro time-to-kill assay on intracellular amastigotes of the laboratory reference strains Leishmania donovani (MHOM/ET/67/L82) and Leishmania infantum [MHOM/MA(BE)/67/ITMAP263] evaluated the cidal action dynamics of the listed reference drugs at three different concentrations: at IC50, 2 × IC50 and the near cytotoxic dose level (CC90: determined on MRC-5 cells). This assay focused on identifying the minimal exposure time needed to completely eliminate viable intracellular amastigotes, using the standard microscopic Giemsa assay and the promastigote back-transformation assay. RESULTS: While 100% reduction was microscopically apparent for most drugs, the promastigote back-transformation assay clearly demonstrated a concentration- and time-dependent cidal mechanism. The time-to-kill at 2 × IC50 was ≥240 h for pentavalent antimony (77 µg eq./mL), 96 h for trivalent antimony (44 µg eq./mL), 168 to >240 h for miltefosine (10 µM), 168 h for paromomycin (100 µM) and >240 h for amphotericin B (2 µM). No differences were noted between both Leishmania species. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the concentration- and time-dependent cidal activity using the promastigote back-transformation assay revealed striking differences in efficacy of the different antileishmanial reference drugs. This assay should allow in-depth pharmacodynamic evaluation of novel drug leads in comparison with the existing antileishmanial drug repertoire.

Evidence of a drug-specific impact of experimentally selected paromomycin and miltefosine resistance on parasite fitness in Leishmania infantum.

OBJECTIVES: Although miltefosine and paromomycin were only recently introduced to treat visceral leishmaniasis, increasing numbers of miltefosine treatment failures and occasional primary resistance to both drugs have been reported. Understanding alterations in parasite behaviour linked to drug resistance is essential to assess the propensity for emergence and spread of resistant strains, particularly since a positive effect on fitness has been reported for antimony-resistant parasites. This laboratory study compared the fitness of a drug-susceptible parent WT clinical Leishmania infantum isolate (MHOM/FR/96/LEM3323) and derived miltefosine and paromomycin drug-resistant lines that were experimentally selected at the intracellular amastigote level. METHODS: Parasite fitness of WT, paromomycin-resistant and miltefosine-resistant strains, in vitro and in vivo parasite growth, metacyclogenesis, infectivity and macrophage stress responses were comparatively evaluated. RESULTS: No significant differences in promastigote fitness were noted between the WT and paromomycin-resistant strain, while clear benefits could be demonstrated for paromomycin-resistant amastigotes in terms of enhanced in vitro and in vivo growth potential and intracellular stress response. The miltefosine-resistant phenotype showed incomplete promastigote metacyclogenesis, decreased intracellular growth and weakened stress response, revealing a reduced fitness compared with WT parent parasites. CONCLUSIONS: The rapid selection and fitness advantages of paromomycin-resistant amastigotes endorse the current use of paromomycin in combination therapy. Although a reduced fitness of miltefosine-resistant strains may explain the difficulty of miltefosine resistance selection in vitro, the growing number of miltefosine treatment failures in the field still requires further exploratory research.

Lack of correlation between the promastigote back-transformation assay and miltefosine treatment outcome.

OBJECTIVES: Widespread antimony resistance in the Indian subcontinent has enforced a therapy shift in visceral leishmaniasis treatment primarily towards miltefosine and secondarily also towards paromomycin. In vitro selection of miltefosine resistance in Leishmania donovani turned out to be quite challenging. Although no increase in IC50 was detected in the standard intracellular amastigote susceptibility assay, promastigote back-transformation remained positive at high miltefosine concentrations, suggesting a more 'resistant' phenotype. This observation was explored in a large set of Nepalese clinical isolates from miltefosine cure and relapse patients to assess its predictive value for patient treatment outcome. METHODS: The predictive value of the promastigote back-transformation for treatment outcome of a set of Nepalese L. donovani field isolates (n = 17) derived from miltefosine cure and relapse patients was compared with the standard susceptibility assays on promastigotes and intracellular amastigotes. RESULTS: In-depth phenotypic analysis of the clinical isolates revealed no correlation between the different susceptibility assays, nor any clear link to the actual treatment outcome. In addition, the clinical isolates proved to be phenotypically heterogeneous, as reflected by the large variation in drug susceptibility among the established clones. CONCLUSIONS: This in vitro laboratory study shows that miltefosine treatment outcome is not necessarily exclusively linked with the susceptibility profile of pre-treatment isolates, as determined in standard susceptibility assays. The true nature of miltefosine treatment failures still remains ill defined.

In Vivo Selection of Paromomycin and Miltefosine Resistance in Leishmania donovani and L. infantum in a Syrian Hamster Model.

In 2002 and 2006, respectively, miltefosine (MIL) and paromomycin (PMM) were licensed in the Indian subcontinent for treatment of visceral leishmaniasis; however, their future routine use might become jeopardized by the development of drug resistance. Although experimental selection of resistant strains in vitro has repeatedly been reported using the less relevant promastigote vector stage, the outcome of resistance selection on intracellular amastigotes was reported to be protocol and species dependent. To corroborate these in vitro findings, selection of resistance in Leishmania donovani and Leishmania infantum was achieved by successive treatment/relapse cycles in infected Syrian golden hamsters. For PMM, resistant amastigotes were already obtained within 3 treatment/relapse cycles, while their promastigotes retained full susceptibility, thereby sharing the same phenotypic characteristics as in vitro-generated PMM-resistant strains. For MIL, even five treatment/relapse cycles failed to induce significant susceptibility changes in either species, which also corresponds with the in vitro observations where selection of an MIL-resistant phenotype proved to be quite challenging. In conclusion, these results argue for cautious use of PMM in the field to avoid rapid emergence of primary resistance and highlight the need for additional research on the mechanisms and dynamics of MIL resistance selection.

Intracellular amastigote replication may not be required for successful in vitro selection of miltefosine resistance in Leishmania infantum.

Although miltefosine (MIL) has only recently been positioned as a first-line therapeutic option for visceral leishmaniasis, field reports note an increasing trend in treatment failures. Study of laboratory selected MIL-resistant strains is needed in the absence of confirmed resistant clinical isolates. In contrast to promastigotes, experimental in vitro selection of MIL-resistance on intracellular amastigotes has not yet been documented. This study reports for the first time the selection of MIL-resistance in Leishmania infantum LEM3323, a strain which clearly shows active intracellular replication. Starting from the hypothesis that active multiplication may be essential in the resistance selection process; several other L. infantum strains were evaluated. Although strain LEM5269 showed only marginally lower intracellular multiplication, selection for resistance failed, as was also the case for several other strains showing poor or no intracellular replication. These results suggest that intracellular multiplication may not be an absolute prerequisite for the outcome of experimental in vitro MIL-resistance selection in clinical field isolates.

Experimental selection of paromomycin and miltefosine resistance in intracellular amastigotes of Leishmania donovani and L. infantum.

Although widespread resistance of Leishmania donovani and L. infantum against miltefosine (MIL) and paromomycin (PMM) has not yet been demonstrated, both run the risk of resistance selection. Unraveling the dynamics and mechanisms of resistance development is key to preserve drug efficacy in the field. In this study, resistance against PMM and MIL was experimentally selected in vitro in intracellular amastigotes of several strains of both species with different antimony susceptibility background. To monitor amastigote susceptibility, microscopic determination of IC50-values and promastigote back-transformation assays were performed. Both techniques were also used to evaluate the susceptibility of field isolates from MIL-relapse patients. PMM-resistance could readily be selected in all species/strains, although promastigotes remained fully PMM-susceptible. Successful MIL-resistance selection was demonstrated only by promastigote back-transformation at increasing MIL-concentrations upon successive selection cycles. Important to note is that amastigotes with the MIL-resistant phenotype could not be visualized after Giemsa staining; hence, MIL-IC50-values showed no shift. The same phenomenon was observed in a set of recent clinical isolates from MIL-relapse patients. This study clearly endorses the need to use intracellular amastigotes for PMM- and MIL-susceptibility testing. When monitoring MIL-resistance, promastigote back-transformation should be used instead of the standard Giemsa staining. In-depth exploration of the mechanistic background of this finding is warranted.