Quality of reporting of phase II trials: a focus on highly ranked oncology journals.

BACKGROUND: Phase II trials represent an essential step in the development of anticancer drugs. This study assesses the quality of their reporting in highly ranked oncology journals, investigates predictive factors of quality, and proposes reporting guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the table of contents of all volumes of eight peer-reviewed oncology journals published in English between January and December 2011 with a 2011 impact factor (IF)>4. Two reviewers assessed the quality of each report by using a 44-point overall quality score (OQS). Primary end point definition, justification of sample size, and definition of the evaluable population, were assessed separately to establish a 3-point key methodological score (KMS). Exploratory analyses identified predictive factors associated with scores. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-six articles were included. The median OQS was 28 (range: 9-35). OQS subsection analysis showed that reporting of statistical methods was low with a median OQS of 3. Median KMS was 2 (range 0-3). Primary end point definition, justification of sample size and definition of the evaluable population were reported in only 107 (68.6%), 121 (77.6%), and 52 (33.3%) cases, respectively. At multivariate analysis, registration on clinicaltrials.gov and IF>10 were associated with improved OQS. No associations for KMS were observed. CONCLUSION: Phase II trial reporting is still poor even in journals with strict editorial policies. This may lead to biased interpretation of phase II trial results. Besides using a checklist during the preparation of their manuscript, authors should also provide reviewers and readers with the last version of the study's protocol.

Effects of small variations in insulin and glucagon levels on plasma aminoacids concentrations.

To determine the effect in normal subjects of small variations of insulin and glucagon on plasma aminoacids concentrations we suppressed endocrine pancreas secretion with somatostatin and measured aminoacids levels during a sequential insulin infusion in the absence (control test, low glucagon level) or in the presence (normal glucagon concentration) of a replacement glucagon infusion. Insulin infusion rates were 0.05, 0.09, 0.15 and 0.30 mU.kg-1.min-1 during the control test and 0.09, 0.15, 0.30 and 0.40 mU.kg-1.min-1 during the replacement test. During the control test, glucagon decreased (p less than 0.01) and insulin levels were successively 8.2 +/- 0.4, 10.1 +/- 0.7, 11.9 +/- 0.14 and 18.5 +/- 0.8 mU.l-1. The only effect on insulin was to decrease branched-chain aminoacids (BCAA). BCAA were inversely related to insulinemia (p less than 0.01). A significant decrease was obtained for an insulin level of 11.9 +/- 0.4 mU.l-1, a value intermediate between those decreasing glycerol (10.1 +/- 0.7 mU.l-1) and stimulating total body glucose uptake (18.5 +/- 0.8 mU.l-1). During the test with glucagon replacement glucagon was maintained at its initial value. Insulin levels were successively 8.3 +/- 0.3, 11.9 +/- 0.3, 19.7 +/- 0.6 and 26.7 +/- 0.5 mU.l-1. Insulin decreased always BCAA but also threonine, proline, tyrosine, methionine and total aminoacid levels. BCAA were always inversely related to insulin levels (p less than 0.01) but the slope of the relationship was modified and more insulin was needed to decrease BCAA concentration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of epinephrine on the relationship between nonesterified fatty acid availability and ketone body production in postabsorptive man: evidence for a hepatic antiketogenic effect of epinephrine.

The effect of epinephrine (EPI) on the transformation of nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) into ketone bodies (KB) in normal subjects was determined by measuring simultaneously NEFA ([1-13C]palmitic acid) and KB ([3-13C]- or [3,4-13C2]acetoacetate) kinetics at different NEFA levels in the presence of basal (control test) or increased (EPI infusion test) EPI concentrations. During the control test the initial (postabsorptive state) concentrations and turnover rates of NEFA and KB were 476 +/- 47 (+/- SEM) and 4.30 +/- 0.17 mumol kg-1 min-1 (NEFA) and 126 +/- 17 and 2.49 +/- 0.07 mumol kg-1 min-1 (KB). The fraction of NEFA converted into KB was between 11.5-14.6%. Raising NEFA levels to about 650 mumol L-1 (iv infusion of a triglyceride emulsion) resulted in an increase in this fraction to between 26-30.3% (P less than 0.01). When NEFA concentrations were next abruptly raised to high levels (near 3 mmol L-1) by heparin injection this fraction returned to near the initial values (15-19.2%). During the EPI infusion test the initial (postabsorptive) concentrations and turnover rates of NEFA and KB as well as the fraction of NEFA converted into KB (10.5-11.5%) were comparable to the initial values of the control test. Intravenous infusion of EPI (10 ng kg-1 min-1) raised NEFA between 600 and 750 mumol L-1, comparable to values during the triglyceride test, but the fraction of NEFA converted into KB remained between 8.2-12% (P less than 0.05 vs. control test); when NEFA then were raised to even higher values (near 2.5 mmol L-1) by the infusion of a triglyceride emulsion and the injection of heparin, this fraction decreased to between 4-8% (P less than 0.05 vs. initial values of the EPI test and P less than 0.05 vs. the control test). In conclusion, 1) the fraction of NEFA converted into KB appears to depend in part on the NEFA concentration; and 2) the net effect of EPI infusion was to decrease the fraction of NEFA converted into KB.