Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 161
Filter
2.
J Appl Microbiol ; 135(5)2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38609348

ABSTRACT

AIM: Evaluate the efficacy of sponge wipe sampling at recovering potential bacterial surrogates for Category A and B non-spore-forming bacterial bioterrorism agents from hard, nonporous surfaces. METHODS: A literature survey identified seven nonpathogenic bacteria as potential surrogates for selected Category A and B non-spore-forming bacterial agents. Small (2 × 4 cm) and large (35.6 × 35.6 cm) coupons made from either stainless steel, plastic, or glass, were inoculated and utilized to assess persistence and surface sampling efficiency, respectively. Three commercially available premoistened sponge wipes (3M™, Sani-Stick®, and Solar-Cult®) were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean recoveries from persistence testing indicated that three microorganisms (Yersinia ruckeri, Escherichia coli, and Serratia marcescens) demonstrated sufficient persistence across all tested material types. Sampling of large inoculated (≥107 CFU per sample) coupons resulted in mean recoveries ranging from 6.6 to 3.4 Log10 CFU per sample. Mean recoveries for the Solar-Cult®, 3M™ sponge wipes, and Sani-Sticks® across all test organisms and all material types were ≥5.7, ≥3.7, and ≥3.4 Log10 CFU per sample, respectively. Mean recoveries for glass, stainless steel, and ABS plastic across all test organisms and all sponge types were ≥3.8, ≥3.7, and ≥3.4 Log10 CFU per sample, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Recovery results suggest that sponge wipe sampling can effectively be used to recover non-spore-forming bacterial cells from hard, nonporous surfaces such as stainless steel, ABS plastic, and glass.


Subject(s)
Bioterrorism , Stainless Steel , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Plastics , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Serratia marcescens/isolation & purification , Glass , Colony Count, Microbial , Biological Warfare Agents
4.
Inorg Chem ; 62(48): 19741-19748, 2023 Dec 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38044828

ABSTRACT

Magnetic refrigeration based on the magnetocaloric effect (MCE) in metal-organic frameworks (MOF) is regarded as an attractive approach to create more sustainable cooling systems with higher efficiency than traditional ones. Here, we report a study of the MCE in a series of rare-earth-based MOFs. We have considered the selection of the rare-earth cation by investigating materials belonging to the α-rare-earth polymeric framework-4 (α-RPF-4) MOF family, synthesized with different rare-earth cations, and observed that paramagnetic moment and saturation magnetization play an important role in enhancing the magnetic entropy change ΔSM. The effect of structural parameters has also been considered by investigating three classes of metal-organic Gd materials built up from different types of inorganic secondary building units, including clusters (as in Gd-UiO-66), one-dimensional (as in α-RPF-4), and layered (as in Gd-LRH) conformations. Moreover, the analysis of the hydrostatic pressure influence reveals a significant increase in the -ΔSM and relative cooling power (RCP) with values between 4.3 and 16.3 and 121-509 J/kg. Specifically, the RCPmax found was ∼683 J/kg for Gd-UiO-66, which is higher than the one recently observed for Gd2SiO5 (649.5 J/kg). The present study demonstrates that the engineering of metal-organic framework systems based on high Gd densities may favor enhancing of magnetocaloric responses even at low pressures, thus promoting a new design strategy for efficient cooling devices.

8.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 33(6): 419-430, 2023 12 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37669083

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Impairment of smell is more commonly related to chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) than without, especially when asthma and/or NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease and type 2 inflammation are also present. Therapeutic options include intranasal and systemic corticosteroids, surgery, and, more recently, biological therapy. We summarize current knowledge on the effect of biologics on olfaction in patients with CRSwNP. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases from January 2001 to June 2022. The inclusion criteria were as follows: adult patients with CRS treated with dupilumab, omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, or reslizumab; and studies published in English reporting outcomes for sense of smell based on psychophysical and/or subjective tools. We excluded reports that did not assess CRSwNP, loss of smell evaluated with a method other than those accepted in the inclusion criteria, review articles, and expert opinions. No funding was received. RESULTS: Dupilumab has demonstrated rapid and sustained long-term improvement in smell in clinical trials and in real life. Omalizumab improves smell at 24 weeks. This improvement is maintained in the long-term, although it is not clinically relevant. Mepolizumab and benralizumab improved smell in the long term based on a subjective scale. No studies examining the improvement in smell in patients with CRSwNP treated with reslizumab were found. Indirect comparisons by meta-analysis consistently conclude that dupilumab is the most effective biologic for improving impaired sense of smell. CONCLUSION: Dupilumab seems to be more efficacious for improving the sense of smell than omalizumab, mepolizumab, and benralizumab.


Subject(s)
Nasal Polyps , Rhinitis , Rhinosinusitis , Sinusitis , Adult , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Nasal Polyps/drug therapy , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Smell , Chronic Disease , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Quality of Life
11.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 33(4): 281-288, 2023 Jul 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35503227

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Comorbidities can influence asthma control and promote asthma exacerbations (AEs). However, the impact of multimorbidity in AEs, assessed based on long-term follow-up of patients with asthma of different degrees of severity, has received little attention in real-life conditions. To describe the epidemiological and clinical characteristics and predictors of AEs in patients who had presented at least 1 AE in the previous year in the MEchanism of Genesis and Evolution of Asthma (MEGA) cohort. METHODS: The work-up included a detailed clinical examination, pulmonary function testing, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), blood counts, induced sputum, skin prick-tests, asthma questionnaires, and assessment of multimorbidity. The number of moderate-severe AEs in the preceding year was registered for each patient. RESULTS: The study population comprised 486 patients with asthma (23.7% mild, 35% moderate, 41.3% severe). Disease remained uncontrolled in 41.9%, and 47.3% presented ≥1 moderate-severe AE, with a mean (SD) annual exacerbation rate of 0.47 (0.91) vs 2.11 (2.82) in mild and severe asthma, respectively. Comorbidity was detected in 56.4% (66.6% among those with severe asthma). Bronchiectasis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, atopy, psychiatric illnesses, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension were significantly associated with AEs. No associations were found for FeNO, blood eosinophils, or total serum IgE. Sputum eosinophilia and a high-T2 inflammatory pattern were significantly associated with AEs. Multivariable regression analysis showed a significant association with asthma severity, uncontrolled disease, and low prebronchodilator FEV1/FVC. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed a high frequency of AE in the MEGA cohort. This was strongly associated with multimorbidity, asthma severity, poor asthma control, airflow obstruction, higher sputum eosinophils, and a very high-T2 inflammatory pattern.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Eosinophilia , Humans , Nitric Oxide , Multimorbidity , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/epidemiology , Eosinophils
12.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 33(1): 37-44, 2023 Feb 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35416154

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), which is characterized by partial loss of smell (hyposmia) or total loss of smell (anosmia), is commonly associated with asthma and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD). CRSwNP worsens disease severity and quality of life. The objective of this real-world study was to determine whether biological treatments prescribed for severe asthma can improve olfaction in patients with CRSwNP. A further objective was to compare the improvement in in olfaction in N-ERD and non-N-ERD subgroups. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, noninterventional, retrospective, observational study of 206 patients with severe asthma and CRSwNP undergoing biological treatment (omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, or reslizumab). RESULTS: Olfaction improved after treatment with all 4 monoclonal antibodies (omalizumab [35.8%], mepolizumab [35.4%], reslizumab [35.7%], and benralizumab [39.1%]), with no differences between the groups. Olfaction was more likely to improve in patients with atopy, more frequent use of short-course systemic corticosteroids, and larger polyp size. The proportion of patients whose olfaction improved was similar between the N-ERD (37%) and non-N-ERD (35.7%) groups. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first real-world study to compare improvement in olfaction among patients undergoing long-term treatment with omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, or benralizumab for severe asthma and associated CRSwNP. Approximately 4 out of 10 patients reported a subjective improvement in olfaction (with nonsignificant differences between biologic drugs). No differences were found for improved olfaction between the N-ERD and non-N-ERD groups.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Biological Products , Nasal Polyps , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Humans , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Nasal Polyps/complications , Nasal Polyps/drug therapy , Smell , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Anosmia/complications , Anosmia/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Asthma/complications , Asthma/drug therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Sinusitis/complications , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Chronic Disease , Rhinitis/complications , Rhinitis/drug therapy
15.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 33(1): 37-44, 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-216402

ABSTRACT

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), which is characterized by partial loss of smell (hyposmia) or total loss of smell (anosmia), is commonly associated with asthma and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug–exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD). CRSwNP worsens disease severity and quality of life. Objectives: The objective of this real-world study was to determine whether biological treatments prescribed for severe asthma can improve olfaction in patients with CRSwNP. A further objective was to compare the improvement in in olfaction in N-ERD and non–N-ERD subgroups.Methods: We performed a multicenter, noninterventional, retrospective, observational study of 206 patients with severe asthma and CRSwNP undergoing biological treatment (omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, or reslizumab). Results: Olfaction improved after treatment with all 4 monoclonal antibodies (omalizumab [35.8%], mepolizumab [35.4%], reslizumab [35.7%], and benralizumab [39.1%]), with no differences between the groups. Olfaction was more likely to improve in patients with atopy, more frequent use of short-course systemic corticosteroids, and larger polyp size. The proportion of patients whose olfaction improved was similar between the N-ERD (37%) and non–N-ERD (35.7%) groups. Conclusions: This is the first real-world study to compare improvement in olfaction among patients undergoing long-term treatment with omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, or benralizumab for severe asthma and associated CRSwNP. Approximately 4 out of 10 patients reported a subjective improvement in olfaction (with nonsignificant differences between biologic drugs). No differences were found for improved olfaction between the N-ERD and non–N-ERD groups (AU)


La rinosinusitis crónica con poliposis nasal (PN), caracterizada por la pérdida parcial o completa del olfato (hiposmia o anosmia, respectivamente), se asocia frecuentemente a asma y a enfermedad respiratoria exacerbada por ácido acetilsalicílico (EREA), lo cual implica una mayor gravedad y un deterioro adicional de la calidad de vida del paciente. Objetivos: El objetivo principal de este estudio fue determinar, en condiciones de vida real, si los tratamientos biológicos prescritos para asma grave mejoraban el olfato en aquellos pacientes que asociaban PN. Como objetivo secundario, se comparó la mejoría del olfato entre los subgrupos EREA y no EREA. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo un estudio multicéntrico, observacional, retrospectivo, que incluyó 206 pacientes con PN y asma grave en tratamiento con algún biológico (omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab oreslizumab). Resultados: Se encontró mejoría del olfato con todos los biológicos: omalizumab (35,8%), mepolizumab (35,4%), reslizumab (35,7%) y benralizumab (39,1%), sin diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre ellos. Los pacientes con atopia, mayor uso de corticoides sistémicos y mayor tamaño de PN inicial, presentaron mayor mejoría. La proporción de pacientes que presentaron mejoría en el olfato fue similar entre el grupo EREA (37%) y no EREA (35,7%). Conclusiones: Se trata del primer estudio que compara, en condiciones de vida real, la mejoría del olfato en pacientes en tratamiento con omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab o benralizumab indicados por asma grave que asociaban PN. Aproximadamente, 4 de cada 10 pacientes refirió mejoría subjetiva en el olfato (sin diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los distintos biológicos). No se encontraron diferencias entre el grupo EREA y no EREA (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Asthma/drug therapy , Olfaction Disorders/drug therapy , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Nasal Polyps/complications , Nasal Polyps/drug therapy , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Rhinitis/complications , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Sinusitis/complications , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Chronic Disease , Quality of Life
17.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 33(6): 419-430, 2023. ilus, tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-228624

ABSTRACT

Background: Impairment of smell is more commonly related to chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) than without, especially when asthma and/or NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease and type 2 inflammation are also present. Therapeutic options include intranasal and systemic corticosteroids, surgery, and, more recently, biological therapy. We summarize current knowledge on the effect of biologics on olfaction in patients with CRSwNP.Methods: We performed a systematic search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases from January 2001 to June 2022. The inclusion criteria were as follows: adult patients with CRS treated with dupilumab, omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, or reslizumab; and studies published in English reporting outcomes for sense of smell based on psychophysical and/or subjective tools. We excluded reports that did not assess CRSwNP, loss of smell evaluated with a method other than those accepted in the inclusion criteria, review articles, and expert opinions. No funding was received.Results: Dupilumab has demonstrated rapid and sustained long-term improvement in smell in clinical trials and in real life. Omalizumab improves smell at 24 weeks. This improvement is maintained in the long-term, although it is not clinically relevant. Mepolizumab and benralizumab improved smell in the long term based on a subjective scale. No studies examining the improvement in smell in patients with CRSwNP treated with reslizumab were found. Indirect comparisons by meta-analysis consistently conclude that dupilumab is the most effective biologic for improving impaired sense of smell.Conclusion: Dupilumab seems to be more efficacious for improving the sense of smell than omalizumab, mepolizumab, and benralizumab. (AU)


Antecedentes: La pérdida de olfato de la rinosinusitis crónica se relaciona principalmente con el fenotipo que presenta poliposis nasal (RSCcPN), especialmente si asocia asma y/o EREA, e inflamación tipo 2. Los corticoides intranasales y sistémicos, la cirugía y, de forma más reciente, los fármacos biológicos, constituyen las principales estrategias terapéuticas. Este documento contiene una revisión sistemática del efecto de los fármacos biológicos en el olfato de pacientes con RSCcPN. Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática en las bases de datos PubMed y Cochrane desde enero de 2001 hasta junio de 2022. Los criterios de inclusión fueron: pacientes adultos con RSC tratados con dupilumab, omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab o reslizumab; estudios publicados en inglés, con datos sobre la mejoría del olfato utilizando test psicofísicos y/o subjetivos. Los criterios de exclusión fueron: publicaciones que no incluían pacientes con poliposis nasal, la pérdida del olfato evaluada con un método diferente de los criterios de inclusión mencionados, los artículos de revisión y la opinión de expertos. No se empleó ningún recurso de financiación. Resultados: Dupilumab ha demostrado una mejora del olfato rápida y mantenida a largo plazo en ensayos clínicos y en la práctica clínica habitual. Omalizumab mejora el olfato en la 24ª semana y lo mantiene a largo plazo, pero no alcanza una mejoría clínicamente relevante. Mepolizumab y benralizumab mejoran el olfato a largo plazo, evaluado mediante un test subjetivo. No se encontraron estudios respecto a la mejoría del olfato en pacientes con RSCcPN tratados con reslizumab. Las comparaciones indirectas mediante metaanálisis concluyen de forma consistente que dupilumab es el biológico más eficaz para mejorar el sentido del olfato. Conclusión: Dupilumab es el biológico más eficaz en la mejoría del olfato en RSCcPN, en comparación con omalizumab, mepolizumab y benralizumab. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Nasal Polyps/drug therapy , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Quality of Life
20.
Rev Med Interne ; 43(12): 743-745, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36184335

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is a live attenuated strain of Mycobacterium bovis. Intravesical therapy with BCG has long been proved to be effective in treating early-stage bladder carcinoma. CASE REPORT: A 81-year-old male patient with former history of BCG instillations for bladder cancer two years ago was admitted in February 2020 to our department for a pulsatile and painful tumefaction of the right thigh that lasted for 6 months, due to a muscular M. bovis granuloma leading to femoral artery erosion. Emergency vascular surgery associated with prolonged antibiotherapy provided full recovery. DISCUSSION: Late infectious complications of intravesical BCG instillations are classical but rare. Isolated muscular involvement is exceptional. CONCLUSION: Mycobacterial infection should be carefully screened face to a granuloma presenting as muscular pseudotumor. A history of BCG therapy, even decades earlier, enhances this hypothesis and should lead to enforce microbiological testing, especially molecular test.


Subject(s)
Mycobacterium bovis , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Aged, 80 and over , BCG Vaccine/adverse effects , Administration, Intravesical , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/diagnosis , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Granuloma/chemically induced , Granuloma/diagnosis , Granuloma/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...