Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 13(10): e0007771, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31658265

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Important arboviral diseases, such as dengue, chikungunya, and Zika virus infections, are transmitted mainly by the Aedes aegypti vector. So far, controlling this vector species with current tools and strategies has not demonstrated sustainable and significant impacts. Our main objective was to evaluate whether open field release of sterile males, produced from combining the sterile insect technique using radiation with the insect incompatible technique through Wolbachia-induced incompatibility (SIT/IIT), could suppress natural populations of Ae. aegypti in semi-rural village settings in Thailand. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Irradiated Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti males produced by the SIT/IIT approach were completely sterile and were able to compete with the wild fertile ones. Open field release of these sterile males was conducted in an ecologically isolated village in Chachoengsao Province, eastern Thailand. House-to-house visit and media reports resulted in community acceptance and public awareness of the technology. During intervention, approximately 100-200 sterile males were released weekly in each household. After 6 months of sterile male release, a significant reduction (p<0.05) of the mean egg hatch rate (84%) and the mean number of females per household (97.30%) was achieved in the treatment areas when compared to the control ones. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our study represents the first open field release of sterile Ae. aegypti males developed from a combined SIT/IIT approach. Entomological assessment using ovitraps, adult sticky traps, and portable vacuum aspirators confirmed the success in reducing natural populations of Ae. aegypti females in treated areas. Public awareness through media resulted in positive support for practical use of this strategy in wider areas. Further study using a systematic randomized trial is needed to determine whether this approach could have a significant impact on the diseases transmitted by Ae. aegypti vector.


Subject(s)
Aedes/physiology , Entomology/methods , Mosquito Control/methods , Mosquito Vectors/physiology , Rural Population , Aedes/microbiology , Aedes/radiation effects , Animals , Female , Humans , Infertility, Male , Male , Mosquito Vectors/microbiology , Mosquito Vectors/radiation effects , Population Dynamics , Sex Characteristics , Thailand , Wolbachia/genetics , Wolbachia/physiology
2.
J Vector Ecol ; 34(2): 217-24, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20836825

ABSTRACT

The main objective of this study was to find the optimal dosage of deltamethrin, cyphenothrin, D-tetramethrin, and tetramethrin that would elicit repellency and irritability responses of Aedes aegypti. The F1-F3 generations of field mosquitoes collected from Pu Teuy Village, Sai-Yok District, Kanchanaburi Province, Thailand, were tested with four pyrethroids to determine the LC(25), LC(50), and LC(99). These concentrations were 0.010%, 0.020%, and 0.055%, respectively, for deltamethrin; 0.113%, 0.167%, and 0.353%, respectively, for cyphenothrin; 2.091%, 2.770%, and 5.114%, respectively, for d-tetramethrin; and 2.377%, 4.251%, and 10.715%, respectively, for tetramethrin. All dosages were tested in the excito-repellency system. Survival analysis was used to compare each chamber of the test. It was found that cyphenothrin had a stronger repellent effect than the other pyrethroids, while the contact irritant effect was similar among compounds tested. The LC(50) of each pyrethroid was found to be the optimal dose for repelling Ae. aegypti. There was no significant difference in LC(99) values for either non-contact or contact trials for each pyrethroid.


Subject(s)
Aedes , Insect Repellents , Insecticides , Pyrethrins , Animals , Female , Lethal Dose 50 , Thailand
3.
J Vector Ecol ; 31(2): 311-8, 2006 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17249349

ABSTRACT

Flight behavior studies were carried out from December 2004 through February 2005 at two sites in Thailand to compare the movement patterns of Aedes aegypti into and out of experimental huts baited with a human host, dog host, or without a host using a mark-release-recapture study design. Studies were conducted in isolated villages of Kanchanaburi and Chiang Mai Provinces, Thailand. In the presence of a human host only 4.9% (39/800) of the Ae. aegypti females departed the hut as compared to 46.5% (372/800) when a dog was present. There was no significant difference in the numbers of Ae. aegypti exiting when comparing dog to no host. A peak in exiting behavior in the absence of any host (human or dog) was observed between 1400-1700 h. Ingress behavior was much stronger when a human host was present in the hut with the peak of entering occurring in the morning (0830-1130 h) compared to 1000-1200 h without a host. Overall, significant differences between the two host types were observed with Ae. aegypti females being more attracted to humans (p < 0.05) than dogs. There was no significant difference between numbers of Ae. aegypti entering the hut baited with a dog and the hut containing no host source. The experimental hut design used in the present study can serve as a protocol for testing the exiting and entering behavior of Ae. aegypti in response to chemical compounds.


Subject(s)
Aedes , Appetitive Behavior , Animals , Dogs , Female , Housing , Humans , Thailand
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...