Starc II, a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial of trapidil for 1-year clinical events and angiographic restenosis reduction after coronary angioplasty and stenting.

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of trapidil 200 mg t.i.d. in preventing the occurrence of death, of myocardial infarction and the need for repeat revascularization at 12 months after balloon PTCA with or without stenting. Coronary restenosis after stenting is still a major drawback of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for 30-40% of patients. Trapidil has been shown to prevent restenosis after PTCA. Eligible patients were randomized to placebo or oral trapidil 200 mg t.i.d. at least 48 hr before PCI and continuing 6 months after a successful balloon angioplasty or stent implantation. Aspirin was given to all patients, and ticlopidine 250 mg b.i.d. to those who received a stent for 4 weeks. In a randomized subgroup of 216 patients, quantitative coronary angiography was performed also at 6-month follow-up. Out of the 933 patients enrolled, primary endpoint incidence was 20.3% in trapidil and 18.0% in placebo (P = 0.37). When recurrence or deterioration of angina was added to the combined endpoint, incidence was 27.4% in trapidil and 23.0% in placebo (P = 0.12). Restenosis rate in patients with 6-month angiography was 25.0% in trapidil arm vs. 30.1% in placebo (P = 0.43). Stent restenosis rate was similar in patients randomized to trapidil or placebo (30.2% vs. 23.8%, respectively; P = 0.44), while in patients treated with balloon angioplasty, it was lower in trapidil (17.1%) than in placebo (40.0%; P = 0.03). Oral trapidil 200 mg t.i.d. for 6 months in addition to aspirin did not influence the occurrence of major cardiac events after coronary angioplasty with or without stenting. In a prespecified subgroup of 191 patients treated with balloon angioplasty only, trapidil reduced angiographic restenosis.

Comparison of bronchoprotective and bronchodilator effects of a single dose of formoterol delivered by hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon aerosols and dry powder in a double blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

BACKGROUND: In response to the phasing out of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) inhalers, a metered dose hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulation, Modulite (Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Parma, Italy), to be delivered with a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI), has been developed. Modulite is a HFA formulation technology that has been designed to provide stable and uniform dose delivery of HFA-based formulations to enable an easy transition from CFC to HFA inhalers. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the bronchoprotective and bronchodilator effects of a single dose of 12 microg of formoterol from the HFA Modulite inhaler with the Foradil Aerolizer (dry powder inhaler, DPI) and the Foradil CFC inhalers (Novartis Health Consumer, Basel, Switzerland). METHODS: This was a double blind, double dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study conducted in 38 subjects with mild to moderate asthma (mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] 87.5% predicted). The primary endpoint was methacholine challenge provocative dose required for 20% fall in the FEV1 (PD20) 90 min post dose. Bronchodilation was assessed with spirometry (FEV1, FVC, FEF25-75) and impulse oscillometry (resistance at 5 and 20 Hz, reactance at 5 Hz and resonant frequency) over the 90 min post dose. In a subset of 12 subjects formoterol plasma levels, serum potassium and glucose were determined up to 480 min post dose. RESULTS: The three formoterol formulations demonstrated significant (P < or = 0.05) improvements in bronchoprotection compared to placebo and non-inferiority of the HFA preparation compared to the CFC and DPI preparations was demonstrated. Geometric mean PD20 values were 0.51 mg with HFA, 0.62 mg with DPI, 0.62 mg with CFC and 0.2 mg with placebo. The log transformed mean differences in PD20 doubling dose between HFA and (a) DPI was -0.28 (95% CI -0.84-0.29, P = 0.57) (b) CFC was -0.28 (95% CI -0.84-0.28, P = 0.57) and (c) placebo was 1.38 (95% CI 0.82-1.94, P < 0.001). Serum potassium, glucose and formoterol plasma profiles were comparable for the CFC, HFA and DPI devices. CONCLUSION: Our findings of similar efficacy, pharmacokinetics and systemic effects of the HFA formoterol inhaler compared to the CFC and DPI preparations supports the potential use of this novel formulation in the treatment of asthma.