Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 64(2): 207-11, 1996 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8820004

ABSTRACT

In an open study, 172 male and female adult patients with acute uncomplicated bacterial cystitis were randomly allocated to three treatment groups. Two groups received brodimoprim 200 mg tablets as follows: a single dose of two 200 mg tablets on day 1, followed by one tablet per day on days 2 and 3 (58 patients); or a single daily dose of two tablets, for 2 days (63 patients). The third group received a single dose of pefloxacin, as two 400 mg tablets, for 1 day (51 patients). Complete urinalysis, sediment and urine culture examinations were carried out before treatment and 10 days after the last dose. Evaluation also comprised, at the time of enrolment and 48 h after the last dose, measurement of corporal temperature and assessment of symptoms (dysuria, pollakiuria, strangury, suprapubic pain, burning sensation during urination and urgency) on a 4-point scale. The eradication rate for the pathogen concerned was 98.3% and 96.7% in the groups receiving brodimoprim for 3 and 2 days, respectively, and 92.8% in the pefloxacin group (between-group comparison n.s.). There was significant regression of symptoms (P < 0.001) in the three groups (between-groups comparison n.s.). Mainly gastrointestinal adverse events occurred in 3 patients receiving brodimoprim for 2 days and in 4 patients from each of the other two groups.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Cystitis/drug therapy , Pefloxacin/administration & dosage , Trimethoprim/analogs & derivatives , Acute Disease , Adult , Aged , Anti-Infective Agents/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pefloxacin/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Trimethoprim/administration & dosage , Trimethoprim/adverse effects
2.
Circulation ; 90(6): 2710-5, 1994 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7994812

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Trapidil is an antiplatelet drug with specific platelet-derived growth factor antagonism and antiproliferative effects in the rat and rabbit models after balloon angioplasty. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Studio Trapidil versus Aspirin nella Restenosi Coronarica (STARC) is a multicentric, randomized, double-blind trial to assess the effects of trapidil in angiographic restenosis prevention after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Patients received either trapidil 100 mg TID or aspirin at the same dosage at least 3 days before angioplasty and for 6 months thereafter. Coronary angiograms before PTCA, after PTCA, and at 6-month follow-up were quantitatively analyzed with manual calipers. Of the initial 384 patients recruited, 254 were evaluable for restenosis analysis (128 trapidil, 126 aspirin). Restenosis, defined as a loss of initial percent gain after PTCA of at least 50% (primary end point), occurred in 24.2% of the trapidil group and 39.7% of the aspirin group (P < .01). A similar result was obtained when restenosis per vessel was considered (trapidil, 23.3%; aspirin, 36.9%; P = .018). Clinical events at follow-up were similar in the two groups except that recurrent angina was significantly more frequent in the aspirin group, 43.7% versus 25.8% in the trapidil group (P < .01). Trapidil was well tolerated: only 6 patients had to discontinue the drug because of side effects, which was not different from the aspirin group. CONCLUSIONS: Trapidil reduces restenosis after PTCA at the dosage of 100 mg TID and favorably influences the clinical outcome thereafter.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Coronary Disease/therapy , Platelet-Derived Growth Factor/antagonists & inhibitors , Trapidil/therapeutic use , Aged , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Disease/diagnostic imaging , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Trapidil/adverse effects
3.
Clin Trials Metaanal ; 29(1): 31-40, 1994 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10150183

ABSTRACT

Restenosis remains the principal drawback of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) since 30-35% of patients still experience it 6 months after the intervention. Several studies have clearly demonstrated that restenosis is a complex multifactorial process that involves smooth muscle cell (SMC) migration and proliferation in the intimal layer of the coronary artery. Among others, the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) seems to play an important role in this process. That is why researches have been made in finding and developing new agents able to inhibit PDGF. Trapidil (triazolopyrimidine) (T), is a potent PDGF inhibitor that has been efficacious in preventing restenosis after balloon angioplasty in the experimental animal and after PTCA in a limited clinical trial. The Trapidil Restenosis Trial (STARC study) is a double blind randomized trial of T 100 mg t.i.d. vs. Aspirin (ASA) 100 mg t.i.d. 360 patients have been enrolled from April 1990 until May 1992, excluding recent myocardial infarctions, thrombolysis, restenotic and venous graft lesions and 302 have terminated follow-up. This paper describes the clinical background, the protocol and baseline data of the patient population including data regarding initial stenosis and type of vessel treated.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Coronary Disease/prevention & control , Trapidil/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Clinical Protocols , Cohort Studies , Coronary Disease/pathology , Coronary Disease/therapy , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle, Smooth, Vascular/pathology , Platelet-Derived Growth Factor/antagonists & inhibitors , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Recurrence , Trapidil/administration & dosage , Tunica Intima/pathology
4.
J Chemother ; 5(6): 551-5, 1993 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8195856

ABSTRACT

78 pediatric patients affected by acute otitis media were selected and randomized into two balanced groups of treatment: brodimoprim, at the dosage of 200 mg once-a-day on the first day and of 100 mg once-a-day on the following days, and cefaclor at a dosage of 40 mg/Kg/day in three doses. Brodimoprim resulted more efficacious in the reduction of symptoms, especially hypoacusis and tinnitus (p < 0.05 between treatments); tympanometry showed a higher number of normalizations in the brodimoprim group, without significant differences between treatments. Both drugs resulted active against most of isolated bacterial strains. Side effects were reported in 4 patients treated with brodimoprim and in 6 patients in the control group.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections , Cefaclor/therapeutic use , Otitis Media/drug therapy , Trimethoprim/analogs & derivatives , Acute Disease , Cefaclor/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Otitis Media with Effusion/drug therapy , Trimethoprim/adverse effects , Trimethoprim/therapeutic use
5.
Clin Ther ; 12(6): 547-55, 1990.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2289222

ABSTRACT

Thirty patients aged 26 to 70 years with a history of chronic osteoarthritis of at least eight years were randomly assigned to receive 20 mg daily of beta-cyclodextrin-piroxicam (beta-CDP) or tenoxicam for eight weeks. Both drugs effectively reduced pain, inflammation, and functional limitations of the affected joints. Endoscopy revealed minor posttreatment hemorrhagic lesions and erosions; these tended to be less severe in the group treated with beta-CDP than with tenoxicam. Slight to moderate gastrointestinal symptoms were reported by one patient treated with beta-CDP and three patients treated with tenoxicam; the symptoms were poorly correlated with endoscopic findings. It is concluded that both drugs are safe and effective in the control of symptoms in patients with chronic osteoarthritis.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Cyclodextrins/therapeutic use , Gastric Mucosa/drug effects , Intestinal Mucosa/drug effects , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Piroxicam/analogs & derivatives , Piroxicam/therapeutic use , beta-Cyclodextrins , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease , Drug Therapy, Combination , Duodenoscopy , Duodenum , Female , Gastroscopy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
6.
Clin Ther ; 12(5): 376-84, 1990.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2125242

ABSTRACT

The efficacy and tolerability of the monoamine oxidase B inhibitor selegiline and of the nootropic agent oxiracetam were compared in a single-blind, controlled, parallel study. The trial involved 22 men and 18 women with mild-to-moderate senile and presenile dementia of the Alzheimer type. The treatments were administered for 90 consecutive days as follows: one 10-mg selegiline tablet once daily and one 800-mg oxiracetam tablet twice daily. Efficacy was evaluated by means of a complex battery of neuropsychological tests, administered monthly for three months, starting from baseline. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse drug reactions as well as any pathological changes in hematology, blood chemistry, or liver and kidney function, measured at baseline and again at the conclusion of the study. Analysis of the results demonstrates that, at the dosage used, selegiline is more effective than oxiracetam in improving higher cognitive functions and reducing impairment in daily living. In particular, short- and long-term memory, sustained concentration, attention, verbal fluency, and visuospatial abilities were, for the most part, positively affected by selegiline. Gastroenteric and systemic tolerability of both drugs was also very good.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Pyrrolidines/therapeutic use , Selegiline/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Single-Blind Method
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...