ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: During the worldwide pandemic of COVID-19 caused by coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, hospitals developed contingency plans that transformed and reorganized the hospital activity. One of the measures was to restrict access to family members of hospitalized patients. The presence of the patient's family is considered an alternative to physical restraint. The aim of this study is to compare the use of physical restraint in hospitalized patients in an acute care hospital during the previous period of the pandemic of COVID-19 with the post-confinement period with hospitals being still closed to family. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We made an observational study that compares the prevalence of physical restraint in an acute care hospital during the previous period to the alarm state (February 2020) with the second period, when visits where restricted (May 2020). From the clinical history of the patients with physical restraint we collected the following variables: sex, diagnostic, hospital admission unit, reason for using physical restraint, localization, length, type of material, registration in the medical record, information given to the family, alternatives to the physical restraint and injuries related to the physical restraint. RESULTS: We evaluated 690 patients: 388 during the previous period and 320 during the second period. From all patients, 29 needed physical restraint. The use of physical restraint went from 8 (2%) to 21 (7%) (p=0.003). In the second period, a not statistically significant increase in continuous physical restraint was identified compared to the first period. CONCLUSIONS: The physical restraint prevalence has been superior during the second period in which families were not present with the hospitalized patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Family , Restraint, Physical/statistics & numerical data , Visitors to Patients , Acute Disease , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Improvement in hand hygiene (HH) compliance has been associated with a decrease in the incidence of hospital-acquired infection (HAI) and hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HA-MRSA) infection/colonization. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a multimodal intervention in medical wards on HH compliance, alcohol-based hand rub (AHR) consumption and incidence of HAI and HA-MRSA. A before-after intervention study and an assessment 1 year later were conducted in three internal medicine wards. HH compliance during routine patient care was monitored using the WHO HH observation method. AHR consumption was registered. HAI incidence was actively sought during the PRE and POST periods. HAI risk factors were prospectively recorded and incidence density was calculated. A total of 825 patients were prospectively followed in the PRE period and 868 patients in the POST period. We observed 1531 opportunities for HH in PRE and POST periods and 450 1 year later. HH compliance improved from 54.3% to 75.8% (p 0.005) and remained 75.8% at follow-up. AHR consumption increased from 10.5 to 27.2 L/1000 hospital-days and 31.5 L/1000 hospital-days at follow-up. Incidence density of HAI was 6.93 and 6.96/1000 hospital-days in the PRE and POST intervention periods, respectively. HA-MRSA incidence density was 0.92 in the PRE period vs. 0.25/1000 hospital-days in the POST period (p 0.2) and 0.15/1000 hospital-days (p 0.1) 1 year later. A sustained increase in AHR consumption was followed by an improvement in HH compliance after a multimodal campaign. A trend for lower incidence density of new hospital-acquired MRSA was detected in the POST intervention and follow-up periods.
