Comparison of the efficacy and safety of a proposed biosimilar MSB11456 with tocilizumab reference product in subjects with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: results of a randomised double-blind study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of the proposed biosimilar MSB11456 versus European Union (EU)-approved tocilizumab reference product in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, multinational, parallel-group study (NCT04512001). METHODS: Adult patients with moderate-to-severe active RA and inadequate clinical response to ≥1 disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (synthetic or biologic) receiving methotrexate were randomised to receive 24 weekly subcutaneous 162 mg injections of either MSB11456 or EU-approved tocilizumab. Equivalence between treatments was considered if the 95% CI (European Medicines Agency)/90% CI (US Food and Drug Administration) for the difference in mean change from baseline to week 24 in Disease Activity Score-28 Joint Count with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) between treatments was entirely within prespecified equivalence intervals (-0.6 to 0.6 and -0.6 to 0.5, respectively). At week 24, patients were rerandomised to continued treatment or MSB11456. Secondary efficacy endpoints to week 52, and safety and immunogenicity to week 55 were also evaluated. RESULTS: At week 24, the least squares mean difference in the change from baseline in DAS28-ESR between treatments was 0.01 (95% CI -0.19 to 0.22) in the 604 randomised patients. Similarity between treatments was shown for all other efficacy, safety and immunogenicity endpoints, including in patients who switched from EU-approved tocilizumab to MSB114466. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic equivalence was demonstrated for efficacy endpoints, and safety and immunogenicity analyses support the similarity of the two treatments. The results of this study strengthen the evidence that the proposed biosimilar MSB11456 and EU-approved tocilizumab exert similar clinical effects.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of prefilled syringe and auto-injector presentations of MSB11456: results of a randomized, single-dose study in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: Tocilizumab is a monoclonal immunoglobulin G interleukin-6 receptor antagonist. MSB11456 is a proposed tocilizumab biosimilar. OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetic equivalence of a single subcutaneous injection of MSB11456, when delivered via autoinjector (AI) and prefilled syringe (PFS), in healthy adult subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, single fixed-dose, crossover study, 91 subjects received subcutaneous administration of tocilizumab 162 mg via AI and PFS presentations. The primary endpoint pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using analysis of variance. Safety data were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: There were no differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between presentations, and safety parameters were comparable. The 90% confidence intervals for the geometric least squares mean ratios of all primary pharmacokinetic parameters were contained within the predefined 80.00% to 125.00% bioequivalence limits, indicating pharmacokinetic equivalence between the AI and PFS. CONCLUSIONS: MSB11456 administration via AI was bioequivalent to administration via PFS. MSB11456 can be administered by AI or PFS, increasing the available range of self-injection devices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at EudraCT, number 2020-003419-86.

Tocilizumab is a biologic drug that is used to treat autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis. MSB11456 has been shown to be equivalent to the US-licensed and EU-approved tocilizumab when administered by subcutaneous injection. There are different devices available to administer subcutaneous injections, and depending on the device, the patient's experience can be enhanced, convenience and compliance increased, and cost-effectiveness ensured for patients taking this medicine. This randomized, single fixed-dose, crossover study tested the pharmacokinetic similarity of MSB11456 when given subcutaneously via an auto-injector device versus a pre-filled syringe device in 100 healthy subjects. A total of 91 healthy volunteers received MSB11456 via both auto-injector and pre-filled syringe using a crossover design. Blood was collected before the first dose and at regular intervals during the study to determine the pharmacokinetics of tocilizumab and ensure safety. This study found that the pharmacokinetics of tocilizumab following administration using the autoinjector and the prefilled syringe were equivalent, and the safety profiles were similar. These findings indicate that the auto-injector can be considered another option that can be used to subcutaneously inject MSB11456.

Pharmacokinetics of a proposed tocilizumab biosimilar (MSB11456) versus US-licensed tocilizumab: results of a randomized, double-blind, single-intravenous dose study in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: Tocilizumab, a recombinant monoclonal immunoglobulin G, targets the interleukin-6 receptor. MSB11456 is a proposed tocilizumab biosimilar. OBJECTIVES: To assess pharmacokinetic equivalence of intravenous MSB11456 to US-licensed tocilizumab. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this double-blind, parallel-group, single-dose study, 128 healthy adults were randomized to a single one-hour 8 mg/kg IV infusion of either MSB11456 or US-licensed tocilizumab. Blood samples were collected pre-dose and at regular intervals up to day 48 post-dose. The primary endpoint pharmacokinetic parameter was analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) model on the natural logarithm of the endpoint (AUC0-last), with treatment as a fixed effect. Immunogenicity and safety data were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: Subjects received either MSB11456 (N = 62) or US-licensed tocilizumab (N = 66). Pharmacokinetic bioequivalence, defined as 90% confidence intervals for the geometric least squares mean ratio entirely contained within the 80.00% to 125.00% equivalence limits, was demonstrated between MSB11456 and US-licensed tocilizumab for the primary and secondary pharmacokinetic endpoints. Anti-drug antibody responses, frequency of neutralizing antibodies against tocilizumab, and safety profiles showed no notable between-treatment differences. Safety was comparable between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacokinetic similarity of MSB11456 and US-licensed tocilizumab was demonstrated, with comparable immunogenicity and safety profiles, supporting MSB11455 as a biosimilar to US-licensed tocilizumab. The trial is registered at EudraCT, number 2019-003484-22.

Tocilizumab is a biologic drug that is prescribed for autoimmune conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis in adults and arthritis in children where the cause is unknown. Because of the high cost of biologic drugs, alternate similar drugs are being designed and tested to ensure that they are as effective and as safe as drugs that are currently available. These new drugs are called biosimilars. MSB11456 is a proposed tocilizumab biosimilar. Our study tested how the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and safety of intravenously administered MSB11456 compared to that of the already approved tocilizumab drug marketed in the US (US-licensed tocilizumab). One hundred and twenty-eight healthy adult volunteers received a one-hour 8 mg/kg intravenous infusion of either MSB11456 or US-licensed tocilizumab in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, single-dose study. Blood samples were taken before and at scheduled times during the study, up to 48 days after the first dose for analysis. In this study, we showed that the pharmacokinetics of MSB11456 were equivalent to the US-licensed tocilizumab. The safety and immune response to the drugs were also similar. These findings indicate that MSB11456 can be considered a biosimilar to tocilizumab. Biosimilars can reduce the cost of drugs by increasing competition and improve access to these, generally expensive, treatment options.

A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of the Proposed Adalimumab Biosimilar MSB11022 Delivered via Autoinjector and Pre-filled Syringe in Healthy Subjects.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to demonstrate the bioequivalence, and compare the safety and tolerability of MSB11022, a proposed biosimilar of adalimumab, when delivered by either an autoinjector (AI) or a pre-filled syringe (PFS). METHODS: In this pharmacokinetic (PK), parallel group, open-label study, 216 healthy volunteers were randomised 1:1 to receive a single subcutaneous injection of a 40 mg/0.8 mL dose of MSB11022 administered via AI or PFS. Coprimary PK endpoints were maximum observed concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t), and AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-inf). PK equivalence between the AI and PFS administration methods was declared if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of geometric least square means was entirely contained within the 80-125% equivalence margin for all coprimary endpoints. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. RESULTS: The 90% CI for the three coprimary PK endpoints (Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-inf) were entirely contained within the predefined equivalence margins of 80-125%. Mean serum concentration-time profiles were similar following injection via AI or PFS. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were comparable across both treatment groups. Study device-related TEAEs were reported by 11.3% and 13.1% of subjects in the AI and PFS treatment groups, respectively. Study drug-related TEAEs were reported by 28.3% and 34.6% of subjects in the AI and PFS treatment groups, respectively. Few subjects experienced injection-site reactions, mainly pain and erythema, regardless of the administration method. CONCLUSION: Delivery of MSB11022 via an AI is bioequivalent to delivery via a PFS. The safety and tolerability profile of MSB11022 was comparable across administration methods. The development of an AI for MSB11022 provides a choice of self-injection devices available to patients, potentially improving treatment compliance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov trial identifier: NCT04018599.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a proposed tocilizumab biosimilar MSB11456 versus both the US-licensed and EU-approved products: a randomized, double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: Tocilizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 antibody against the interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6 R). MSB11456 is a proposed tocilizumab biosimilar. OBJECTIVES: To assess the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity of MSB11456 to both US-licensed and EU-approved tocilizumab. METHODS: Healthy adult volunteers (N = 685) received a single 162 mg subcutaneous injection of MSB11456, US-licensed tocilizumab, or EU-approved tocilizumab in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Blood samples were taken pre-dose and for up to 48 days post-dose. Primary endpoint pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using analysis of covariance. Secondary pharmacodynamic measures included serum-soluble IL-6 R and serum C-reactive protein. Safety data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic equivalence (with all corresponding 90% confidence intervals for the geometric least squares mean ratios within the predefined 80.00% to 125.00% equivalence margin) was demonstrated between MSB11456 and both US-licensed and EU-approved tocilizumab, as well as between the reference products. Pharmacodynamic analyses demonstrated similarity of MSB11456 and both US-licensed and EU-approved tocilizumab, as well as between the reference products. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were comparable between treatments. CONCLUSION: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity of MSB11456, US-licensed tocilizumab, and EU-approved tocilizumab were demonstrated, and the three products had comparable immunogenicity and safety, supporting MSB11456 as a biosimilar to tocilizumab.

Tocilizumab is a biologic drug that is used to treat autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis. Biologic drugs are very important for the treatment of autoimmune diseases, but their costs limit accessibility. Therefore, the availability of biosimilars, which are biologics that are very similar in structure and function to an existing biologic drug, may provide a significant cost advantage for national healthcare programs and consumers. MSB11456 is a proposed tocilizumab biosimilar. Our study tested the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity of MSB11456 to the approved formulations of tocilizumab in the US and EU (US-licensed and EU-approved tocilizumab) in a large group of healthy adults. Volunteers received a single 162 mg subcutaneous injection of MSB11456, US-licensed tocilizumab, or EU-approved tocilizumab in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Blood samples were taken before and regularly after the injection, and safety was monitored. We showed that the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of MSB11456, US-licensed and EU-approved tocilizumab were sufficiently similar to claim equivalence between the three products. Safety and immunogenicity were also comparable between the three treatments. These findings suggest that MSB11456 can be considered as a biosimilar to tocilizumab. Biosimilars have improved price competition and led to a reduction in the net costs of biologics, so tocilizumab biosimilars can be expected to contribute to this and potentially improve access to the best available care.

Safety of adalimumab biosimilar MSB11022 (acetate-buffered formulation) in patients with moderately-to-severely active rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of MSB11022 (acetate-buffered formulation), an adalimumab biosimilar, with the reference product. METHOD: AURIEL-RA study was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial (NCT03052322). Patients with moderately-to-severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to methotrexate were randomized 1:1 to MSB11022 or reference adalimumab. The primary endpoint was the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events of special interest (AESIs) (predefined as hypersensitivity) up to week 52. The key secondary endpoint was ACR20 (≥ 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology core set measurements from baseline) at week 12. Other efficacy endpoints, quality of life, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated up to week 52. Secondary safety endpoints were evaluated up to week 52 and at a 4-month safety follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 288 patients were randomized. The proportion of patients experiencing ≥ 1 treatment-emergent AESI up to week 52 was similar between trial arms: 6 patients (4.2%; 95% CI 1.56, 8.91) receiving MSB11022, and 8 patients (5.5%; 95% CI 2.41, 10.58) receiving reference adalimumab. No clinically meaningful differences in efficacy, quality of life, or immunogenicity were seen between treatment arms up to week 52. No notable difference in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was observed between treatment arms up to the end of the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest MSB11022 and reference adalimumab are similar in patients with moderately-to-severely active rheumatoid arthritis in terms of safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy. AURIEL-RA provides evidence to support the similarity of MSB11022 and adalimumab.Key Points• Incidences of hypersensitivity events were similar for MSB11022 (modified buffer) and reference adalimumab.• There was no difference in local reactions between MSB11022 (modified buffer) and reference adalimumab.• AURIEL-RA confirms the equivalence in efficacy and immunogenicity of MSB11022 (modified buffer) and reference adalimumab.

An open-label, in-use study assessing the warming sensation accompanying IFF Flavour 316282 and the acceptability and local tolerability of a syrup containing paracetamol and pseudoephedrine for the short-term treatment of symptoms of an upper respiratory tract infection.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to assess the warming sensation caused by IFF Flavour 316282 in a syrup used for short-term treatment by patients suffering from nasal congestion and mild to moderate body pain, headache, fever or sore throat associated with an upper respiratory tract infection. METHODS: A single cohort, single treatment arm, open-label study. Subjects received one 30 mL dose of syrup containing IFF Flavour 316282, paracetamol and pseudoephedrine and recorded onset and disappearance of any warming sensation in the mouth/throat. Subjects' assessments of strength and appeal of the sensation, taste, texture and acceptability of the product was investigated using questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 56 subjects were included; 53 (94.6%) experienced a warming sensation. The median duration of the warming sensation was 114 s (95% confidence interval: 87-120 s). All subjects rated the syrup as excellent, good or fair for treating their symptoms; 100% and 94.6% of subjects respectively described texture and taste as excellent, good or fair. There were no safety concerns, and the syrup was well tolerated. Most subjects liked the warming sensation. CONCLUSIONS: IFF Flavour 316282 in a syrup for treatment of upper respiratory tract infection symptoms is associated with a warming sensation. The syrup is well tolerated, safe and palatable.

Bioavailability of paracetamol, phenylephrine hydrochloride and guaifenesin in a fixed-combination syrup versus an oral reference product.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to compare the bioavailability of paracetamol, phenylephrine hydrochloride and guaifenesin in a new oral syrup with an established oral reference product. The secondary objective was to compare the safety of the new syrup and the reference product. METHODS: This was a single-centre, open-label, randomized, reference-replicated, crossover study. Healthy adult volunteers received one dose of syrup and two separate doses of a reference oral liquid formulation in a randomized sequence over three study periods, with a washout interval of ≥ 7 days between study periods. Blood samples were taken regularly postdose and analysed for paracetamol, phenylephrine hydrochloride and guaifenesin concentrations; adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: This study enrolled 45 subjects. For paracetamol and guaifenesin, the syrup and reference product were considered to be bioequivalent. Bioequivalence was not shown for phenylephrine hydrochloride. All adverse events were mild or moderate, most of which were considered formulation related. CONCLUSIONS: The syrup did not reach bioequivalence with the reference product, as bioequivalence could not be shown for phenylephrine hydrochloride. This may be due to differences in the excipients between the two products. Both the syrup and the reference product had a good safety profile and were well tolerated.

Clinical assessment of the warming sensation accompanying flavor 316282 in a cold and cough syrup containing paracetamol, phenylephrine hydrochloride, and guaifenesin.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to assess the warming sensation caused by flavor 316282 in a cold and cough product in the target population. METHODS: A single-cohort, single-treatment arm, open-label study. Subjects received one 30-mL dose of syrup containing flavor 316282, paracetamol, phenylephrine hydrochloride, and guaifenesin and recorded onset and disappearance of any warming sensation in the mouth/throat. Subjects' assessment of strength and appeal of the sensation, taste, texture, and acceptability of the product as a cold and cough remedy was investigated using questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 51 subjects were included; 47 (92.1%) experienced a warming sensation. The median duration of the warming sensation was 100 s (95% confidence interval = 82 s, 112 s). The majority of subjects rated the syrup as excellent, good, or fair for treatment of cough and cold symptoms (96.1%), taste (80.4%), and texture (98.0%). There were no safety concerns, and the syrup was well tolerated. Most subjects liked the warming sensation. CONCLUSIONS: Flavor 316282 in a cold and cough syrup is associated with a warming sensation. The syrup is well tolerated, safe, and palatable.