Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 24
Filter
1.
Phys Med ; 120: 103337, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38552274

ABSTRACT

The metrics used for assessing image quality in computed tomography (CT) do not integrate the influence of temporal resolution. A shortcoming in the assessment of image quality for imaging protocols where motion blur can therefore occur. We developed a method to calculate the temporal resolution of standard CT protocols and introduced a specific spatiotemporal formulation of the non-prewhitening with eye filter (NPWE) model observer to assess the detectability of moving objects as a function of their speed. We scanned a cubic water phantom with a plexiglass cylindrical insert (120 HU) using a large panel of acquisition parameters (rotation times, pitch factors and collimation widths) on two systems (GE Revolution Apex and Siemens SOMATOM Force) to determine the in-plane task-based transfer functions (TTF) and noise power spectra (NPS). The phantom set in a uniform rectilinear motion in the transverse plane allowed the temporal modulation transfer function (MTF) calculation. The temporal MTF appropriately compared the temporal resolution of the various acquisition protocols. The longitudinal TTF was measured using a thin tungsten wire. The detectability index showed the advantage of applying high rotation speed, wide collimations and high pitch for object detection in the presence of motion. No counterpart to the increase in these three parameters was found in the in-plane and longitudinal image quality.


Subject(s)
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Radiation Dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Phantoms, Imaging , Algorithms
2.
Phys Med Biol ; 69(2)2024 Jan 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38214048

ABSTRACT

Objective.Determining the detectability of targets for the different imaging modalities in mammography in the presence of anatomical background noise is challenging. This work proposes a method to compare the image quality and detectability of targets in digital mammography (DM), digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and synthetic mammography.Approach. The low-frequency structured noise produced by a water phantom with acrylic spheres was used to simulate anatomical background noise for the different types of images. A method was developed to apply the non-prewhitening observer model with eye filter (NPWE) in these conditions. A homogeneous poly(methyl) methacrylate phantom with a 0.2 mm thick aluminium disc was used to calculate 2D in-plane modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS), noise equivalent quanta, and system detective quantum efficiency for 30, 50 and 70 mm thicknesses. The in-depth MTFs of DBT volumes were determined using a thin tungsten wire. The MTF, system NPS and anatomical NPS were used in the NPWE model to calculate the threshold gold thickness of the gold discs contained in the CDMAM phantom, which was taken as reference. Main results.The correspondence between the NPWE model and the CDMAM phantom (linear Pearson correlation 0.980) yielded a threshold detectability index that was used to determine the threshold diameter of spherical microcalcifications and masses. DBT imaging improved the detection of masses, which depended mostly on the reduction of anatomical background noise. Conversely, DM images yielded the best detection of microcalcifications.Significance.The method presented in this study was able to quantify image quality and object detectability for the different imaging modalities and levels of anatomical background noise.


Subject(s)
Calcinosis , Mammography , Humans , Mammography/methods , Phantoms, Imaging , Polymethyl Methacrylate , Aluminum , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods
3.
Phys Med Biol ; 66(24)2021 12 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34808602

ABSTRACT

Objectives. The planar formulation of the noise equivalent quanta (NEQ) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) used to assess the image quality of projection images does not deal with the influence of temporal resolution on signal blurring and image noise. These metrics require correction factors based on temporal resolution when used for dynamic imaging systems such as fluoroscopy. Additionally, the standard NEQ and detector DQE are determined on pre-processed images in scatter-free conditions for effective energies produced by additional aluminium or copper filters that are not representative of clinical fluoroscopic procedures. In this work, we developed a method to measure 'frame NEQ' and 'frame system DQE' which include the temporal frequency bandwidth and consider the anti-scatter grid, the detector and the image processing procedures for beam qualities with scatter fractions representative of clinical use.Approach. We used a solid water phantom to simulate a patient and a thin copper disc to measure the spatial resolution. The copper disc, set in uniform rectilinear motion in the image plane, assessed the temporal resolution. These new metrics were tested on two fluoroscopy systems, a C-arm and a floor-mounted cardiology, for multiple parameters: phantom thicknesses from 5 to 20 cm, frame rates from 3 to 30 fps, spatial and temporal image processing of different weights.Main results.The frame NEQ correctly described the image quality for different scatter conditions, temporal resolutions and image processing techniques. The frame system DQE varied between 0.38 and 0.65 within the different beam and scatter conditions, and correctly mitigated the influence of spatial and temporal image processing.Significance.This study introduces and validates an unbiased formulation of in-plane NEQ and system DQE to assess the spatiotemporal image quality of fluoroscopy systems.


Subject(s)
Copper , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Fluoroscopy/methods , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging
4.
Phys Med Biol ; 65(10): 105009, 2020 06 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32182590

ABSTRACT

The standard Fourier metrics used for assessing image quality in computed tomography (CT) use a planar (2D) formulation of the noise equivalent quanta (NEQ) without a specific concept to manage the influence of longitudinal resolution variations, thus create a bias in the comparison of image quality for different reconstructed slice thicknesses. For this work, we designed a 'slice NEQ' that takes the longitudinal resolution into account and provides a volumetric indication of the scanner imaging performance. We also developed a specific formulation for the system DQE at the CT isocentre. A cylindrical water phantom with three different inserts for three contrast levels (-100, 120 and 1000 HU) was used for the task-based transfer functions (TTF) and noise power spectra (NPS) measurements. The longitudinal TTF was measured using the point source of the Catphan® 600 phantom. Images of the phantoms were acquired on two scanners (GE Discovery 750 HD and Siemens SOMATOM Force) and reconstructed using different slice thicknesses between 1 and 5 mm and algorithms (FBP for both systems, ASIR 50 and ASIR-V 50 for the GE). The slice NEQ correctly compared the imaging performance for different longitudinal resolutions whereas the 2D NEQ increased proportionally with the reconstructed slice thickness. The system DQE peaked at 0.70 (at 0.1 mm-1) for the Siemens and at 0.50 (at 0.1 mm-1) for the GE for FBP reconstructions. The validity of these Fourier-based metrics was restricted to a limited range of contrast due to nonlinearities introduced when dealing with iterative reconstructions (IR).


Subject(s)
Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Algorithms , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Water
5.
Phys Med Biol ; 65(9): 095013, 2020 05 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32191923

ABSTRACT

A rigorous 2D analysis of signal and noise transfer applied to reconstructed planes in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is necessary for system characterization and optimization. This work proposes a method for assessing technical image quality and system detective quantum efficiency (DQEsys) for reconstructed planes in DBT. Measurements of 2D in-plane modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise power spectrum (NPS) were made on five DBT systems using different acquisition parameters, reconstruction algorithms and plane spacing. This work develops the noise equivalent quanta (NEQ), DQEsys and detectability index (d') calculated using a non-prewhitening model observer with eye filter (NPWE) for reconstructed DBT planes. The images required for this implementation were acquired using a homogeneous test object of thickness 40 mm poly(methyl) methacrylate plus 0.5 mm Al; 2D MTF was calculated from an Al disc of thickness 0.2 mm and diameter 50 mm positioned within the phantom. The radiant contrast of the MTF disc and the air kerma at the system input were used as normalization factors. The NPWE detectability index was then compared to the in-plane contrast-detail (c-d) threshold measured using the CDMAM phantom. The MTF and NPS measured on the different systems showed a strong anisotropy, consistent with the cascaded models developed in the literature for DBT. Detectability indices calculated from the measured MTF and NPS successfully predicted changes in c-d detectability for details between 0.1 mm and 2.0 mm, for DBT plane spacings between 0.5 mm and 10 mm, and for air kerma values at the system input between 157 µGy and 1170 µGy. The linear Pearson correlation between the detectability index and threshold gold thickness of the CDMAM phantom was -0.996. The method implements a parametric means of assessing the technical image quality of reconstructed DBT planes, providing valuable information for optimization of DBT systems.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Breast/diagnostic imaging , Mammography/methods , Phantoms, Imaging , Quality Control , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/standards , Female , Humans
6.
Phys Med ; 64: 10-15, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31515008

ABSTRACT

The standard approach to signal difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) analysis requires a region of interest (ROI) positioned within the object to measure signal-difference, restricting this metric to flat-topped objects with large, sharply delineated areas. This work develops a generalized expression for SDNR (SDNRg) calculated from a ROI encompassing the object. Signal power, defined as the deviation of pixel values from the mean background due to the object, is used instead of signal-difference. Comparison was first made by simulating ideal flat-topped discs with sharp edges and diameters between 1 and 80 pixels, into a uniformly noisy background using a known signal-difference. For discs covering more than 20 pixels, SDNRg and standard SDNR (SDNRst) were within 3%, while for discs of less than 20 pixels, SDNRg was within 26% of the truth compared to 58% for SDNRst. Generalized and standard SDNR were compared for radiography images of three different phantoms with microcalcification-like objects (MTM-100 phantom), hemispheric objects of different thicknesses with a Gaussian intensity distribution and mammography quality control (QC) images. Applied to Gaussian details, SDNRg was between 20% and 45% higher than SDNRst, depending on object thickness, while for the QC images, SDNRg was with 1.7% of the standard SDNR. Compared to the standard SDNR, SDNRg is applicable to non-uniform signals, where an explicit contrast measurement is not suitable, and has improved accuracy when assessing SDNR of small objects.


Subject(s)
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Mammography , Signal-To-Noise Ratio
7.
Phys Med Biol ; 62(14): 5691-5722, 2017 Jun 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28557801

ABSTRACT

This work proposes a method for assessing the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of radiographic imaging systems that include both the x-ray detector and the antiscatter device. Cascaded linear analysis of the antiscatter device efficiency (DQEASD) with the x-ray detector DQE is used to develop a metric of system efficiency (DQEsys); the new metric is then related to the existing system efficiency parameters of effective DQE (eDQE) and generalized DQE (gDQE). The effect of scatter on signal transfer was modelled through its point spread function (PSF), leading to an x-ray beam transfer function (BTF) that multiplies with the classical presampling modulation transfer function (MTF) to give the system MTF. Expressions are then derived for the influence of scattered radiation on signal-difference to noise ratio (SDNR) and contrast-detail (c-d) detectability. The DQEsys metric was tested using two digital mammography systems, for eight x-ray beams (four with and four without scatter), matched in terms of effective energy. The model was validated through measurements of contrast, SDNR and MTF for poly(methyl)methacrylate thicknesses covering the range of scatter fractions expected in mammography. The metric also successfully predicted changes in c-d detectability for different scatter conditions. Scatter fractions for the four beams with scatter were established with the beam stop method using an extrapolation function derived from the scatter PSF, and validated through Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. Low-frequency drop of the MTF from scatter was compared to both theory and MC calculations. DQEsys successfully quantified the influence of the grid on SDNR and accurately gave the break-even object thickness at which system efficiency was improved by the grid. The DQEsys metric is proposed as an extension of current detector characterization methods to include a performance evaluation in the presence of scattered radiation, with an antiscatter device in place.


Subject(s)
Models, Theoretical , Radiography/methods , Scattering, Radiation , Monte Carlo Method , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Signal-To-Noise Ratio
8.
Phys Med Biol ; 61(5): 2083-108, 2016 Mar 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26895467

ABSTRACT

A version of cascaded systems analysis was developed specifically with the aim of studying quantum noise propagation in x-ray detectors. Signal and quantum noise propagation was then modelled in four types of x-ray detectors used for digital mammography: four flat panel systems, one computed radiography and one slot-scan silicon wafer based photon counting device. As required inputs to the model, the two dimensional (2D) modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectra (NPS) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) were measured for six mammography systems that utilized these different detectors. A new method to reconstruct anisotropic 2D presampling MTF matrices from 1D radial MTFs measured along different angular directions across the detector is described; an image of a sharp, circular disc was used for this purpose. The effective pixel fill factor for the FP systems was determined from the axial 1D presampling MTFs measured with a square sharp edge along the two orthogonal directions of the pixel lattice. Expectation MTFs were then calculated by averaging the radial MTFs over all possible phases and the 2D EMTF formed with the same reconstruction technique used for the 2D presampling MTF. The quantum NPS was then established by noise decomposition from homogenous images acquired as a function of detector air kerma. This was further decomposed into the correlated and uncorrelated quantum components by fitting the radially averaged quantum NPS with the radially averaged EMTF(2). This whole procedure allowed a detailed analysis of the influence of aliasing, signal and noise decorrelation, x-ray capture efficiency and global secondary gain on NPS and detector DQE. The influence of noise statistics, pixel fill factor and additional electronic and fixed pattern noises on the DQE was also studied. The 2D cascaded model and decompositions performed on the acquired images also enlightened the observed quantum NPS and DQE anisotropy.


Subject(s)
Mammography/methods , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Mammography/instrumentation , Mammography/standards , Radiographic Image Enhancement/instrumentation , Radiographic Image Enhancement/standards , Signal-To-Noise Ratio
9.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 169(1-4): 319-24, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26538617

ABSTRACT

As opposed to the standard detective quantum efficiency (DQE), effective DQE (eDQE) is a figure of merit that allows comparing the performances of imaging systems in the presence of scatter rejection devices. The geometry of the EOS™ slot-scanning system is such that the detector is self-collimated and rejects scattered radiation. In this study, the EOS system was characterised using the eDQE in imaging conditions similar to those used in clinical practice: with phantoms of different widths placed in the X-ray beam, for various incident air kerma and tube voltages corresponding to the phantom thickness. Scatter fractions in EOS images were extremely low, around 2 % for all configurations. Maximum eDQE values spanned 9-14.8 % for a large range of air kerma at the detector plane from 0.01 to 1.34 µGy. These figures were obtained with non-optimised EOS setting but still over-performed most of the maximum eDQEs recently assessed for various computed radiology and digital radiology systems with antiscatter grids.


Subject(s)
Imaging, Three-Dimensional/instrumentation , Radiographic Image Enhancement/instrumentation , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Transducers
10.
Phys Med ; 31(8): 889-896, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26112350

ABSTRACT

Given the contribution of scattered radiations to patient dose in CT, apron shielding is often used for radiation protection. In this study the efficiency of apron was assessed with a model-based approach of the contributions of the four scatter sources in CT, i.e. external scattered radiations from the tube and table, internal scatter from the patient and backscatter from the shielding. For this purpose, CTDI phantoms filled with thermoluminescent dosimeters were scanned without apron, and then with an apron at 0, 2.5 and 5 cm from the primary field. Scatter from the tube was measured separately in air. The scatter contributions were separated and mathematically modelled. The protective efficiency of the apron was low, only 1.5% in scatter dose reduction on average. The apron at 0 cm from the beam lowered the dose by 7.5% at the phantom bottom but increased the dose by 2% at the top (backscatter) and did not affect the centre. When the apron was placed at 2.5 or 5 cm, the results were intermediate to the one obtained with the shielding at 0 cm and without shielding. The apron effectiveness is finally limited to the small fraction of external scattered radiation.


Subject(s)
Models, Theoretical , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Scattering, Radiation , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Phantoms, Imaging
11.
Phys Med Biol ; 59(19): 5741-61, 2014 Oct 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25198143

ABSTRACT

Given the adverse impact of image noise on the perception of important clinical details in digital mammography, routine quality control measurements should include an evaluation of noise. The European Guidelines, for example, employ a second-order polynomial fit of pixel variance as a function of detector air kerma (DAK) to decompose noise into quantum, electronic and fixed pattern (FP) components and assess the DAK range where quantum noise dominates. This work examines the robustness of the polynomial method against an explicit noise decomposition method. The two methods were applied to variance and noise power spectrum (NPS) data from six digital mammography units. Twenty homogeneously exposed images were acquired with PMMA blocks for target DAKs ranging from 6.25 to 1600 µGy. Both methods were explored for the effects of data weighting and squared fit coefficients during the curve fitting, the influence of the additional filter material (2 mm Al versus 40 mm PMMA) and noise de-trending. Finally, spatial stationarity of noise was assessed.Data weighting improved noise model fitting over large DAK ranges, especially at low detector exposures. The polynomial and explicit decompositions generally agreed for quantum and electronic noise but FP noise fraction was consistently underestimated by the polynomial method. Noise decomposition as a function of position in the image showed limited noise stationarity, especially for FP noise; thus the position of the region of interest (ROI) used for noise decomposition may influence fractional noise composition. The ROI area and position used in the Guidelines offer an acceptable estimation of noise components. While there are limitations to the polynomial model, when used with care and with appropriate data weighting, the method offers a simple and robust means of examining the detector noise components as a function of detector exposure.


Subject(s)
Mammography/instrumentation , Mammography/standards , Models, Statistical , Phantoms, Imaging , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Algorithms , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Polymethyl Methacrylate , Radiographic Image Enhancement/standards , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
12.
Med Phys ; 41(6): 063901, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24877841

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: EOS (EOS imaging S.A, Paris, France) is an x-ray imaging system that uses slot-scanning technology in order to optimize the trade-off between image quality and dose. The goal of this study was to characterize the EOS system in terms of occupational exposure, organ doses to patients as well as image quality for full spine examinations. METHODS: Occupational exposure was determined by measuring the ambient dose equivalents in the radiological room during a standard full spine examination. The patient dosimetry was performed using anthropomorphic phantoms representing an adolescent and a five-year-old child. The organ doses were measured with thermoluminescent detectors and then used to calculate effective doses. Patient exposure with EOS was then compared to dose levels reported for conventional radiological systems. Image quality was assessed in terms of spatial resolution and different noise contributions to evaluate the detector's performances of the system. The spatial-frequency signal transfer efficiency of the imaging system was quantified by the detective quantum efficiency (DQE). RESULTS: The use of a protective apron when the medical staff or parents have to stand near to the cubicle in the radiological room is recommended. The estimated effective dose to patients undergoing a full spine examination with the EOS system was 290 µSv for an adult and 200 µSv for a child. MTF and NPS are nonisotropic, with higher values in the scanning direction; they are in addition energy-dependent, but scanning speed independent. The system was shown to be quantum-limited, with a maximum DQE of 13%. The relevance of the DQE for slot-scanning system has been addressed. CONCLUSIONS: As a summary, the estimated effective dose was 290 µSv for an adult; the image quality remains comparable to conventional systems.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Radiography/adverse effects , Radiography/methods , Radiology , Spine/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Artifacts , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Models, Biological , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Phantoms, Imaging , Protective Clothing , Radiation Dosage , Radiography/instrumentation , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry
13.
Phys Med Biol ; 56(14): 4201-20, 2011 Jul 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21701051

ABSTRACT

In many European countries, image quality for digital x-ray systems used in screening mammography is currently specified using a threshold-detail detectability method. This is a two-part study that proposes an alternative method based on calculated detectability for a model observer: the first part of the work presents a characterization of the systems. Eleven digital mammography systems were included in the study; four computed radiography (CR) systems, and a group of seven digital radiography (DR) detectors, composed of three amorphous selenium-based detectors, three caesium iodide scintillator systems and a silicon wafer-based photon counting system. The technical parameters assessed included the system response curve, detector uniformity error, pre-sampling modulation transfer function (MTF), normalized noise power spectrum (NNPS) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE). Approximate quantum noise limited exposure range was examined using a separation of noise sources based upon standard deviation. Noise separation showed that electronic noise was the dominant noise at low detector air kerma for three systems; the remaining systems showed quantum noise limited behaviour between 12.5 and 380 µGy. Greater variation in detector MTF was found for the DR group compared to the CR systems; MTF at 5 mm(-1) varied from 0.08 to 0.23 for the CR detectors against a range of 0.16-0.64 for the DR units. The needle CR detector had a higher MTF, lower NNPS and higher DQE at 5 mm(-1) than the powder CR phosphors. DQE at 5 mm(-1) ranged from 0.02 to 0.20 for the CR systems, while DQE at 5 mm(-1) for the DR group ranged from 0.04 to 0.41, indicating higher DQE for the DR detectors and needle CR system than for the powder CR phosphor systems. The technical evaluation section of the study showed that the digital mammography systems were well set up and exhibiting typical performance for the detector technology employed in the respective systems.


Subject(s)
Mammography/methods , Mammography/standards , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiographic Image Enhancement/standards , Humans , Quality Control
14.
Phys Med Biol ; 56(14): 4221-38, 2011 Jul 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21701050

ABSTRACT

Assessment of image quality for digital x-ray mammography systems used in European screening programs relies mainly on contrast-detail CDMAM phantom scoring and requires the acquisition and analysis of many images in order to reduce variability in threshold detectability. Part II of this study proposes an alternative method based on the detectability index (d') calculated for a non-prewhitened model observer with an eye filter (NPWE). The detectability index was calculated from the normalized noise power spectrum and image contrast, both measured from an image of a 5 cm poly(methyl methacrylate) phantom containing a 0.2 mm thick aluminium square, and the pre-sampling modulation transfer function. This was performed as a function of air kerma at the detector for 11 different digital mammography systems. These calculated d' values were compared against threshold gold thickness (T) results measured with the CDMAM test object and against derived theoretical relationships. A simple relationship was found between T and d', as a function of detector air kerma; a linear relationship was found between d' and contrast-to-noise ratio. The values of threshold thickness used to specify acceptable performance in the European Guidelines for 0.10 and 0.25 mm diameter discs were equivalent to threshold calculated detectability indices of 1.05 and 6.30, respectively. The NPWE method is a validated alternative to CDMAM scoring for use in the image quality specification, quality control and optimization of digital x-ray systems for screening mammography.


Subject(s)
Mammography/methods , Mammography/standards , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiographic Image Enhancement/standards , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Quality Control , Reproducibility of Results
15.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 139(1-3): 459-62, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20395413

ABSTRACT

A method of objectively determining imaging performance for a mammography quality assurance programme for digital systems was developed. The method is based on the assessment of the visibility of a spherical microcalcification of 0.2 mm using a quasi-ideal observer model. It requires the assessment of the spatial resolution (modulation transfer function) and the noise power spectra of the systems. The contrast is measured using a 0.2-mm thick Al sheet and Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) blocks. The minimal image quality was defined as that giving a target contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of 5.4. Several evaluations of this objective method for evaluating image quality in mammography quality assurance programmes have been considered on computed radiography (CR) and digital radiography (DR) mammography systems. The measurement gives a threshold CNR necessary to reach the minimum standard image quality required with regards to the visibility of a 0.2-mm microcalcification. This method may replace the CDMAM image evaluation and simplify the threshold contrast visibility test used in mammography quality.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Mammography/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Radiographic Image Enhancement/standards , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/standards , Female , Humans , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Switzerland
16.
Med Phys ; 34(3): 906-14, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17441236

ABSTRACT

An objective analysis of image quality parameters was performed for six digital mammography systems. The presampled modulation transfer function (MTF), normalized noise power spectrum (NNPS), and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) for the systems were determined at different doses, for 28 kVp with a Mo/Mo or W/Al target/filter combination and 2 mm of additional aluminium filtration. The flat-panel units have higher MTF and DQE in the mid to high frequency range than standard CR systems. The highest DQE, over the whole dose range, is for the slit-scanning direct photon counting system. Dual-side read CR can overcome the inherent x-ray absorption and signal collection limitations of standard CR mammography, improving the low-frequency DQE by 40%, to the same level as full-field systems, but it does not improve the poor spatial resolution of phosphor.


Subject(s)
Mammography/instrumentation , Mammography/methods , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Computer Systems , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Models, Statistical , Photons , Reproducibility of Results , Software , Technology, Radiologic/methods , X-Ray Intensifying Screens , X-Rays
17.
Med Phys ; 33(10): 3637-9, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17089829

ABSTRACT

In our recent paper by Monnin et al. [Med. Phys. 33, 411-420 (2006)], an objective analysis of the relative performance of a computed radiography (CR) system using both standard single-side (ST-VI) and prototype dual-side read (ST-BD) plates was reported. The presampled modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS), and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) for the systems were determined at three different beam qualities representative of paediatric chest radiography, at an entrance detector air kerma of 5 microGy. Experiments demonstrated that, compared to the standard single-side read system, the MTF for the dual-side read system was slightly reduced, but a significant decrease in image noise resulted in a marked increase in DQE (+40%) in the low spatial frequency range. However, the DQE improvement for the ST-BD plate decreased with increasing spatial frequency, and, at spatial frequencies above 2.2 mm(-1), the DQE of the dual-side read system was lower than that of the single-side one.


Subject(s)
Radiographic Image Enhancement/instrumentation , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Humans , Lasers , Radiometry , Reproducibility of Results , Scattering, Radiation , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission
18.
Med Phys ; 33(2): 411-20, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16532949

ABSTRACT

An objective analysis of image quality parameters was performed for a computed radiography (CR) system using both standard single-side and prototype dual-side read plates. The pre-sampled modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS), and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) for the systems were determined at three different beam qualities representative of pediatric chest radiography, at an entrance detector air kerma of 5 microGy. The NPS and DQE measurements were realized under clinically relevant x-ray spectra for pediatric radiology, including x-ray scatter radiations. Compared to the standard single-side read system, the MTF for the dual-side read system is reduced, but this is offset by a significant decrease in image noise, resulting in a marked increase in DQE (+40%) in the low spatial frequency range. Thus, for the same image quality, the new technology permits the CR system to be used at a reduced dose level.


Subject(s)
Phantoms, Imaging , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Child , Equipment Failure Analysis , Humans , Radiographic Image Enhancement/instrumentation , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Radiometry , Reproducibility of Results , Scattering, Radiation , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission
19.
Phys Med Biol ; 50(19): 4541-52, 2005 Oct 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16177488

ABSTRACT

Three standard radiation qualities (RQA 3, RQA 5 and RQA 9) and two screens, Kodak Lanex Regular and Insight Skeletal, were used to compare the imaging performance and dose requirements of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G and the current Kodak T-MAT G/RA medical x-ray films. The noise equivalent quanta (NEQ) and detective quantum efficiencies (DQE) of the four screen-film combinations were measured at three gross optical densities and compared with the characteristics for the Kodak CR 9000 system with GP (general purpose) and HR (high resolution) phosphor plates. The new Hyper Speed G film has double the intrinsic sensitivity of the T-MAT G/RA film and a higher contrast in the high optical density range for comparable exposure latitude. By providing both high sensitivity and high spatial resolution, the new film significantly improves the compromise between dose and image quality. As expected, the new film has a higher noise level and a lower signal-to-noise ratio than the standard film, although in the high frequency range this is compensated for by a better resolution, giving better DQE results--especially at high optical density. Both screen-film systems outperform the phosphor plates in terms of MTF and DQE for standard imaging conditions (Regular screen at RQA 5 and RQA 9 beam qualities). At low energy (RQA 3), the CR system has a comparable low-frequency DQE to screen-film systems when used with a fine screen at low and middle optical densities, and a superior low-frequency DQE at high optical density.


Subject(s)
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , X-Ray Film , X-Ray Intensifying Screens
20.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 114(1-3): 192-7, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15933107

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this work was to compare standard desktop display systems with dedicated medical display systems. The set of image tests proposed by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM TG18) was used to assess a Philips 107S desktop display system and a Siemens medical display. Three observers performed the subjective assessment, in a non-concerted manner. The objective assessment was performed using a CCD camera according to the AAPM TG18 procedure. The results clearly demonstrate the inadequacy of standard desktop display systems in the framework of diagnostic radiology. Moreover, a good correlation between the subjective and objective assessment methods was obtained.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Imaging/instrumentation , Radiography/methods , Radiography/standards , Radiology/methods , Radiometry/methods , Radiometry/standards , Computer Terminals , Computers , Data Display , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Humans , Light , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Radiology Information Systems , Sensitivity and Specificity , Software , User-Computer Interface
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...