Internet use in rheumatology outpatients in 2006: gender less important.

OBJECTIVE: Exploring patients' Internet use, their online needs and requirements, expectations and attitudes towards the Internet is mandatory to effectively provide interactive online applications and information. METHODS: Within a prospective study, 153 consecutive outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus or spondyloarthritis answered a paper-based questionnaire investigating their Internet use, interests, pattern and degree of utilization. Sociodemographic and functional disability data were collected. The data were compared with our survey of 2001 and to the normal German population. RESULTS: Patients were predominantly female (69.3%; n.s.). Mean age was 45.7+/-14.4 years (n.s.). 68.6% (+18.6%, p=0.0027) reported regular Internet use for 5.0+/-2.6 yrs. Internet use in 2006 is still age- and education-dependent (p<0.001, p=0.003). Differences by gender observed in 2001 no longer existed as women increased their Internet use from 2.9 to 6.1 hours/week (p=0.001, p=0.0006). Searching for health-related information remained an important topic. Interest in e-communication and interactive applications strongly increased. Independently of gender and functional disability, patients' future online interests focussed on information on diseases, medications, health care providers and patient education. Confidence in the Internet and reliability of information were rated unchanged since 2001. CONCLUSION: Gender no longer has significant impact on Internet use. The great potentials of Internet services-well accepted by patients and contributing substantially to more effective and improved disease (self-) management strategies-should encourage rheumatologists to provide interactive applications and high-quality information on Internet platforms and in routine patient care. Continuous research to explore the effects of Internet-delivered information on patients' attitudes,expectations, behaviour and outcome is required.

Self-assessments of patients via Tablet PC in routine patient care: comparison with standardised paper questionnaires.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the feasibility of electronic data capture of self-administered patient questionnaires using a Tablet PC for integration in routine patient management; we also compared these data with results received from corresponding paper-pencil versions. METHODS: Standardised patient questionnaires (FFbH/HAQ, BASDAI, SF-36) were implemented in our documentation software. 153 outpatients (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, spondyloarthritis) completed sets of questionnaires as paper-pencil and electronic versions using a Tablet PC. The quality and validity of data obtained using a Tablet PC and the capability of disabled patients to handle it were assigned; patients' experiences, preferences and computer/internet use were also assessed. RESULTS: Scores obtained by direct data entry on the Tablet PC did not differ from the scores obtained by the paper-pencil questionnaires in the complete group and disease subgroups. No major difficulties using the Tablet PC occurred. 62.1% preferred remote data entry in the future. Seven (4.6%) patients felt uncomfortable with the Tablet PC due to their rheumatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Self-administered questionnaires via Tablet PC are a facile and capable option in patients with rheumatic diseases to monitor disease activity, efficacy and safety assessments continuously. Tablet PC applications offers directly available data for clinical decision-making improves quality of care by effective patient monitoring, and contributes to patients' empowerment.

[Disease-oriented Internet use in outpatients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases]. / Krankheitsbezogene Internetnutzung bei Patienten mit entzündlich-rheumatischen Systemerkrankungen.

OBJECTIVE: On behalf of the "systemic inflammatory rheumatic diseases network" comprehensive, nationwide horizontal and vertical cross-linking of research and care is to be developed for the first time. The quality of scientific work and patient care is to be increased in the medium term through this improved communication and co-operation. Our objective was to determine what hardware and software are available to the patients involved, with a view to the Internet being used as a basis for communication. The ultimate aim was to provide patients with an adequate source of information on care. METHODS: A survey was carried out among 400 patients attending our outpatient clinics. Data on the hardware and software used and on Internet access and patterns and degree of utilization were collected using a unilateral questionnaire. RESULTS: 326 patients filled in the questionnaire. 163 of those responding had Internet access, with younger and better educated patients using the Internet significantly more frequently. No dependency was noted on gender or marital status. Mean time duration for Internet use was longer in men. 55.8% of the internet users searched for medical questions. Major search topics included up to date therapeutic options (46.6%) and information on specific diseases (28.8%). CONCLUSION: Internet is an important information medium for patients. Technical requirements and high motivation make communication practicable for about 50% of patients. To ensure acceptance, the Internet platform of the systemic inflammatory rheumatic diseases network needs to be aligned to patients' requirements, bearing in mind the need for extensive high-value, reliable scientific information to be offered on the website.

[Documentation concepts in MedNet-Rheuma (competence network "Inflammatory-rheumatic systemic diseases")]. / Dokumentationskonzepte im MedNet-Rheuma (Kompetenznetzwerk "Entzündlich-rheumatische Systemerkrankungen").

Concepts of documentation rely not only on the contents required and technical demands, but the procedures covered and in medical applications especially security aspects are also matters of critical concern. Even though the need for effective documentation (i.e., adequate in content, availability, feasibility and easy to retrieve analysis) is not a question, tasks and aims (for example, quality of patient care) deserve attention and establishing efforts have to be analyzed regarding their structural and personal prerequisites and implications before particular tools for documentation can be developed.