Limitations of conventional methods of self-monitoring of blood glucose: lessons learned from 3 days of continuous glucose sensing in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Children with type 1 diabetes are usually asked to perform self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) before meals and at bedtime, and it is assumed that if results are in target range, along with HbA(1c) measurements, then overall glycemic control is adequate. However, the brief glimpses in the 24-h glucose profile provided by SMBG may miss marked glycemic excursions. The MiniMed Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS) has provided a new method to obtain continuous glucose profiles and opportunities to examine limitations of conventional monitoring. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 56 children with type 1 diabetes (age 2-18 years) wore the CGMS for 3 days. Patients entered four fingerstick blood samples into the monitor for calibration and kept records of food intake, exercise, and hypoglycemic symptoms. Data were downloaded, and glycemic patterns were identified. RESULTS: Despite satisfactory HbA(1c) levels (7.7 +/- 1.4%) and premeal glucose levels near the target range, the CGMS revealed profound postprandial hyperglycemia. Almost 90% of the peak postprandial glucose levels after every meal were >180 mg/dl (above target), and almost 50% were >300 mg/dl. Additionally, the CGMS revealed frequent and prolonged asymptomatic hypoglycemia (glucose <60 mg/dl) in almost 70% of the children. CONCLUSIONS: Despite excellent HbA(1c) levels and target preprandial glucose levels, children often experience nocturnal hypoglycemia and postprandial hyperglycemia that are not evident with routine monitoring. Repeated use of the CGMS may provide a means to optimize basal and bolus insulin replacement in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Epipen as an alternative to glucagon in the treatment of hypoglycemia in children with diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Fear of a severe hypoglycemic reaction is a major obstacle to achieving near-normal plasma glucose levels. Although parenteral glucagon is effective in treating these reactions, it is cumbersome to use, causes severe nausea, and is impractical in the school setting. Epinephrine is available as a premixed injection (Epipen) that may be used by all care providers. Using Epipen to treat hypoglycemia may be an effective, safe, and easy-to-use alternative to glucagon. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Ten children (age 11.7 +/- 2.4 years) with type 1 diabetes were studied on two occasions. After an overnight equilibration period, hypoglycemia was induced via an insulin pump (1 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1)). At a blood glucose level of 2.8 mmol/l, either glucagon (1 mg) or epinephrine (0.3 mg), in random order, was administered intramuscularly and responses were monitored. RESULTS: Plasma free insulin concentrations were similar in both studies. Plasma glucose levels increased by 1.7 +/- 0.2 mmol/l (mean +/- SEM) in 10 min and by 2.6 +/- 0.2 mmol/l in 15 min with administration of glucagon and were not consistently increased with administration of epinephrine (P < 0.01). Peak glucagon concentrations after administration of glucagon were >60-fold higher than basal concentrations. After administration of epinephrine, peak epinephrine levels were 20-fold higher than basal concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Epinephrine does not seem to be an adequate substitute for glucagon in the treatment of severe hypoglycemia. The effectiveness of glucagon in reversing hypoglycemia and its side effects of nausea and vomiting are likely related to the markedly supraphysiologic plasma levels achieved with the standard intramuscular dose.