Magnetic resonance radiomics for prediction of extraprostatic extension in non-favorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether magnetic resonance (MR) radiomic features combined with machine learning may aid in predicting extraprostatic extension (EPE) in high- and non-favorable intermediate-risk patients with prostate cancer. PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic performance of radiomics to detect EPE. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MR radiomic features were extracted from 228 patients, of whom 86 were diagnosed with EPE, using prostate and lesion segmentations. Prediction models were built using Random Forest. Further, EPE was also predicted using a clinical nomogram and routine radiological interpretation and diagnostic performance was assessed for individual and combined models. RESULTS: The MR radiomic model with features extracted from the manually delineated lesions performed best among the radiomic models with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74. Radiology interpretation yielded an AUC of 0.75 and the clinical nomogram (MSKCC) an AUC of 0.67. A combination of the three prediction models gave the highest AUC of 0.79. CONCLUSION: Radiomic analysis combined with radiology interpretation aid the MSKCC nomogram in predicting EPE in high- and non-favorable intermediate-risk patients.

1.5-T multiparametric MRI using PI-RADS: a region by region analysis to localize the index-tumor of prostate cancer in patients undergoing prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to detect and localize prostate cancer has increased in recent years. In 2010, the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) published guidelines for mpMRI and introduced the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for scoring the different parameters. PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and diagnostic performance of endorectal 1.5-T mpMRI using the PI-RADS to localize the index tumor of prostate cancer in patients undergoing prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This institutional review board IRB-approved, retrospective study included 63 patients (mean age, 60.7 years, median PSA, 8.0). Three observers read mpMRI parameters (T2W, DWI, and DCE) using the PI-RADS, which were compared with the results from whole-mount histopathology that analyzed 27 regions of interest. Inter-observer agreement was calculated as well as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predicted value (NPV) by dichotomizing the PI-RADS criteria scores ≥3. A receiver-operating curve (ROC) analysis was performed for the different MR parameters and overall score. RESULTS: Inter-observer agreement on the overall score was 0.41. The overall score in the peripheral zone achieved sensitivities of 0.41, 0.60, and 0.55 with an NPV of 0.80, 0.84, and 0.83, and in the transitional zone, sensitivities of 0.26, 0.15, and 0.19 with an NPV of 0.92, 0.91, and 0.92 for Observers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The ROC analysis showed a significantly increased area under the curve (AUC) for the overall score when compared to T2W alone for two of the three observers. CONCLUSION: 1.5 T mpMRI using the PI-RADS to localize the index tumor achieved moderate reliability and diagnostic performance.