The Clot Thickens: COVID-19-Related ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Setting of Recent Boosters.

The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) has an array of pathological effects that continue to be discovered. Vaccines against COVID-19 have quickly emerged as our main tool. However, the thrombotic risk of both the virus and the vaccine is yet to be established, let alone together. In this case report, we present a case involving a recently diagnosed COVID-19 patient who developed an ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) after receiving his booster shot. Our aim is to highlight the standard of treatment outcomes in COVID-19-associated clots, familiarize ourselves with the complexity of the clot burden in a COVID-19-associated STEMI, and illustrate the potential role of the cumulative pro-thrombotic effects of a recent COVID-19 booster with a concomitant symptomatic COVID-19 infection.

Resolution of Symptomatic Intermittent Sinoatrial Exit Block Associated With Unstable Angina Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Bradyarrhythmia commonly occurs because of degenerative fibrosis in the conductive system. Ischemic disease is a rare etiology and limited cases have demonstrated direct evidence of ischemia to the sinus node vessels. We report a 62-year-old Hispanic male with a significant medical history of diabetes mellitus type II (DM II), hypertension, and dyslipidemia who was admitted to our hospital for symptomatic sinoatrial (SA) exit block. Patient had no electrolyte abnormalities and our differential included ischemic vs. fibrotic or infiltrative pathologies, giving symptomatic bradycardia, cardiac chest pain, and high-risk factors for coronary artery disease. We decided to take him for cardiac catheterization which revealed sluggish, pulsatile flow into the SA nodal artery due to severe stenosis of the ostial right coronary along with sever distal left circumflex (LCX) lesion. The flow into the sinus nodal artery (SNA) markedly improved post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the right coronary artery (RCA) and distal LCX and restoration of flow into SNA. Resolution of his bradyarrhythmia and symptoms post intervention confirmed our suspicious for reversible ischemic sinus node dysfunctions. Therefore, ischemic pathologies should be thought of when other common etiologies are less likely. Coronary angiogram should be considered prior to pacemaker evaluation in these setting to avoid missing reversible causes of bradyarrhythmia.

The Role of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Treatment of Chronic Total Occlusions: Rationale and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) of a coronary artery is defined as an occluded segment with no antegrade flow and a known or estimated duration of at least 12 weeks. OBJECTIVE: We considered the current literature describing the indications and clinical outcomes for denovo CTO- percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and discuss the role of CTO-PCI and future directions for this procedure. METHODS: Databases (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, EBSCO, Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched and relevant studies of CTO-PCI were selected for review. RESULTS: The prevalence of coronary artery CTO's has been reported to be ~ 20% among patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography for suspected coronary artery disease. Revascularization of any CTO can be technically challenging and a time-consuming procedure with relatively low success rates and may be associated with a higher incidence of complications, particularly at non-specialized centers. However, with an increase in experience and technological advances, several centers are now reporting success rates above 80% for these lesions. There is marked variability among studies in reporting outcomes for CTO-PCI with some reporting potential mortality benefit, better quality of life and improved cardiac function parameters. Anecdotally, properly selected patients who undergo a successful CTO-PCI most often have profound relief of ischemic symptoms. Intuitively, it makes sense to revascularize an occluded coronary artery with the goal of improving cardiovascular function and patient quality of life. CONCLUSION: CTO-PCI is a rapidly expanding specialized procedure in interventional cardiology and is reasonable or indicated if the occluded vessel is responsible for symptoms or in selected patients with silent ischemia in whom there is a large amount of myocardium at risk and PCI is likely to be successful.

Routine Angiographic Follow-Up After Coronary Artery Disease Revascularization: Is Seeing Believing?

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Coronary artery disease is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in the world, and PCI and CABG account for over a million procedures performed annually in the USA. The goal of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is to achieve complete revascularization (CR) if at all possible. However, restenosis and stent thrombosis (ST) remain the Achilles heel of contemporary PCI with restenosis rates between 10 and 30% with bare metal stents to 5-15% after drug-eluting stents and ST rates of around 0.8 vs 1.2%, respectively. Routine angiography after revascularization seems theoretically attractive as this may allow intervention before clinical events occur. In this manuscript, we review the literature regarding routine angiography after PCI or CABG and its outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: According to the 2016 update from the American Heart Association (AHA), 15.5 million people above the age of 20 have coronary heart disease (CHD) in the USA. The prevalence of CHD is now almost similar in both men and women, and one American suffers from a myocardial infarction (MI) every 42 s. Recent data from randomized clinical trials and observational studies does not support the use of routine coronary angiography after revascularization in asymptomatic patients. There are some studies which show that routine angiography may have a role in left main or complex coronary interventions; however, these findings are exploratory and were not seen in randomized trials. After reviewing the data on routine angiography after coronary revascularization, we came to the conclusion that current data does not support the use of routine angiography for asymptomatic patients. However, there is a lack of randomized controlled trial in this field with only one recent trial reporting negative outcomes.