Two-year clinical performance of dual- and light-cure bulk-fill resin composites in Class ӀӀ restorations: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the clinical performance of dual- and light-cure bulk-fill resin composites (BFRCs) in Class ӀӀ restorations after 2 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A double-blinded, prospective, randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted following the CONSORT (Consolidated Standard of Reporting Trials) guidelines. Forty patients were enrolled in the study. Each patient received three compound Class ӀӀ restorations. One dual-cure (Fill-Up; Coltene Waledent AG) and two light-cure (QuiXfil; Dentsply, and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill; Ivoclar Vivadent) BFRCs were used for 120 Class ӀӀ restorations. A universal adhesive (ONE COAT 7 UNIVERSAL; Coltene Waledent AG) was used with all restorations. Restorations were clinically evaluated after 1 week (baseline), 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and finally after 24 months using the FDI World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparison between BFRCs groups at baseline and at each recall period, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for comparing different follow-up times of each BFRC to baseline. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: All BFRCs restorations showed only minor changes and revealed no statistically significant differences between their clinical performance for all evaluated parameters at all recall periods; also, there was no statistically significant difference between all recall periods and baseline for all evaluated parameters. CONCLUSION: The two-year clinical performance of dual-cure BFRC was comparable to light-cure BFRCs in Class ӀӀ restorations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dual- and light-cure BFRCs showed excellent clinical performance in Class ӀӀ restorations after a 2-year clinical follow-up.

Effect of sonic oscillation on penetration and marginal adaptation of filled-resin-based fissure sealants.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of sonic oscillation on penetration depth and marginal adaptation of resin-based fissure sealants. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Thirty-six extracted human third molars were randomized into three groups: in the HF group, teeth were sealed with a filled-resin-based sealant (Helioseal F); in the Sonic-HF group, teeth were sealed with Helioseal F and subjected to sonic oscillation (Compothixo Device, 140 Hz vibration frequency and ± 150 µm amplitude) before curing; in the CO group, teeth were sealed with an unfilled-resin-based sealant (Clinpro). All teeth were thermocycled for 1,500 cycles at 5°C and 55°C, then sectioned buccolingually into four sections (mesial, two middle, and distal). Sections were evaluated under SEM for marginal adaptation and scored. For penetration depth, three independent measurements from each tooth were recorded under SEM, and data were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: The group subjected to sonic oscillation (Sonic HF) resulted in significantly superior penetration depth and marginal adaptation compared with the HF group, but with no significant difference compared with the CO group. CONCLUSIONS: Sonic activation of resin-based sealant increased penetration depth into fissures and marginal adaptation to the enamel wall without decreasing filler load or compromising sealant mechanical properties.

Flowable fiber-reinforced versus flowable bulk-fill resin composites: Degree of conversion and microtensile bond strength to dentin in high C-factor cavities.

OBJECTIVES: To compare flowable fiber-reinforced and flowable bulk-fill resin composites regarding their degree of conversion (DC) and microtensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin in high C-factor class I cavities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One flowable fiber-reinforced (EverX Flow, GC) and two flowable bulk-fill composites (SDR, Dentsply, and Tetric N-flow Bulk fill, Ivoclar Vivadent) were tested. Regarding DC, 10 cylindrical-shaped specimens were prepared from each material (N = 30), measured using Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). Regarding µTBS , class I cavities (4.5 × 4.5 × 3) were prepared on flat dentin surfaces of 30 molars, divided into three equal groups, restored with the three restorative materials, thermocycled, sectioned to create 1 mm × 1 mm cross-sectional beams, then tested using a universal testing machine. Failure mode was assessed using a stereomicroscope. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD post-hoc tests were used in DC, while One-way ANOVA was used for µTBS . RESULTS: The used materials showed statistically significant differences in DC with the fiber-reinforced composite having the highest value. No statistically significant differences were found between the materials regarding their µTBS . CONCLUSIONS: Flowable fiber-reinforced composite provided the most DC performance compared to the flowable bulk-fill composites. The three used restorative materials provided comparable bonding ability to dentin in high C-factor cavities. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Flowable fiber-reinforced resin composite is preferred as a dentin-replacement material in high-stress bearing areas. However, both flowable fiber-reinforced and bulk-fill resin composites are equally effective in bonding to dentin in high C-factor cavities.