ABSTRACT
AIMS OF THE STUDY: In spite of official recommendations and measures in France, screening strategies of hepatitis C performed in the field of transfusion are not clearly known. The aim of this study is to describe the screening strategies before and after the current year of the transfusion in blood recipients in several French medical departments and hospitals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A qualitative study using the key informant technique was carried out. A sample of 179 departments and 64 hospitals in charge of patients transfused with low or high-volumes of homologous blood products was constituted. The key informants were asked about the number of homologous blood products, the number of recipients transfused in the hospital, the volume of transfusion performed, the existence of a single defined screening strategy, the time of prescription of the biological tests (before or after transfusion), the tests performed on cryopreserved blood samples, and the indications of the transfusion. RESULTS: The main screening strategy was HCV serology (second or third generation of enzyme immunoassays) with transaminase assessments before and after transfusion in 14% of the declared screening strategies. Screening tests were more frequently prescribed after transfusion, in at least 64% of the declared screening strategies according to the volume of transfusion. HCV serology was the common test prescribed in 61 and 50% of the screening strategies for low and high-volume transfusion respectively. The screening strategies showed a large heterogeneity combining HCV serology, transaminase assessment, before or after transfusion. CONCLUSION: A great heterogeneity of screening strategies was found. The most frequent was HCV serology with transaminase assessment before and after transfusion. Recommendations on screening strategies are needed in order to limit practice heterogeneity. This study will help building a cost-efficacy model in order to guide public health decision making.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Transfusion Reaction , Alanine Transaminase/blood , Aspartate Aminotransferases/blood , France/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/blood , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/transmission , Hepatitis C Antibodies/blood , Hospitals , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Inpatients , Liver Function Tests , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Sampling Studies , Serologic Tests/methods , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Posttransfusion hepatitis still occurs at an incidence of about 1 in 118,000 for HBV and 1 in 220,000 for HCV. This collaborative study aimed to determine the prevalence of a novel flavivirus, GBV-C/HGV, even though its role in transfusion-associated hepatitis is uncertain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: GBV-C/HGV RNA was detected by PCR using either the Boehringer detection kit or by primers previously described. HGV antibodies were detected by a serological assay from Boehringer. RESULTS: The observed GBV-C/HGV RNA frequency was 3.4%. HGV antibodies occurred in 9.5% of donors. CONCLUSION: In our study, 12. 9% of the donors had been in contact with the GBV-C/HGV virus.
Subject(s)
Blood Donors , Flaviviridae/genetics , Hepatitis Antibodies/blood , RNA, Viral/blood , Adolescent , Adult , Female , France , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Reference Values , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The exact significance of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV) in blood donors remains unknown. Confirmatory tests of anti-HCV-reactive serum and HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are used to refute a large proportion of false-positive results. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Ninety-two blood donors who were anti-HCV reactive in a first-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were reevaluated 10 months later with a second-generation ELISA (ELISA-2) as well as with second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2) and by PCR. RESULTS: Twenty-five (43.9%) of the 57 ELISA-2-positive donors were confirmed as positive by RIBA-2; of these, 84 percent were HCV RNA positive in PCR. Of the 57 who were still anti-HCV positive, 46 were followed up and tested again in the same manner 2 years after the first screening. At that time, the pattern was little changed: 94 percent of RIBA-2- and PCR-positive donors remained positive. Of RIBA-2- and PCR-positive blood donors, 62 percent had abnormal alanine aminotransferase levels in at least one of the three evaluations. Among the anti-HCV-positive donors confirmed by RIBA-2, 60 percent, versus 12.6 percent in the control group, had a significantly (p < 0.001) more frequent risk factor for HCV infection, due to parenteral exposure to blood. CONCLUSION: These data confirm a good correlation between RIBA-2 reactivity and the detection of HCV RNA in a population of anti-HCV-positive blood donors.
