Optimizing maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: where do we stand in the year 2024?

INTRODUCTION: Despite the prognosis of patients affected by acute myeloid leukemia (AML) improved in the last decade, most patients relapse. Maintenance therapy after a chemotherapy approach with or without allogeneic stem cell transplantation could be a way to control the undetectable residual burden of leukemic cells. Several studies are being carried out as maintenance therapy in AML. Some critical points need to be defined, how the physician can choose among the various drugs available. AREAS COVERED: This reviewdiscusses the advances and controversies surrounding maintenance therapy forAML patients. EXPERT OPINION: Patients withFLT3-positive AML should receive midostaurin or quizartinib in the first-linesetting. For a patient initially receiving midostaurin, consider switching tosorafenib in the post-transplant setting. Because of the improved safetyprofile and potency, many experts will lean toward using a second-generationFLT3 inhibitor such as quizartinib or gilteritinib. Finally, no data indicatewhether maintenance therapy should be prolonged until progression or for adefined period.

Rituximab with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and prednisone as first-line treatment for splenic marginal zone lymphoma: a Fondazione Italiana Linfomi phase II study.

Rituximab® provides high response rates and effective disease palliation in patients with splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL). We conducted a phase II trial in patients with SMZL who were either untreated or were splenectomized but had shown disease progression within 1 year after splenectomy. Treatment consisted of six courses of Rituximab with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and prednisone (R-COMP). Fifty-one patients were eligible for the analysis. The overall response rate was 84%. The 6-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 54% and 72%, respectively. Toxicity was substantial (grade≥3 neutropenia: 26%; grade≥3 infections: 8%). Of the 15 deaths, two occurred on treatment (one sepsis and one pneumonia). Six deaths were due to lymphoma progression, four to secondary neoplasia, one to sepsis, one to pneumonia and one to splenectomy complications. R-COMP should be restricted to patients with bulky disease associated with symptoms or to patients with possible histological transformation.

Outcome of frail elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma prospectively identified by Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment: results from a study of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi.

In 2003 the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) started a clinical research program for investigating initial treatment of frail elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) identified by Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). From 2003 to 2006, 334 elderly patients underwent CGA assessment, and 99 patients were classified as frail. Frail patients had a median age of 78 years, stage III-IV disease in 62% and age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) of 2-3 in 53%. Treatment consisted of several different regimens according to physician discretion. After a median follow-up of 36 months, 5-year overall survival (OS) was 28%. In multivariate analysis, aaIPI 2-3 (p = 0.005) and the presence of respiratory comorbidity (p = 0.044) were the only factors that showed independent correlation with OS. Frail patients had a poorer outcome compared with fit patients also if they were treated with rituximab-containing combination chemotherapy (hazard ratio 2.37, 95% confidence interval 1.48-3.78; p < 0.001). CGA is a valid tool to prospectively identify frail subjects among elderly patients with DLBCL.