2024 ISFM and AAFP consensus guidelines on the long-term use of NSAIDs in cats.

PRACTICAL RELEVANCE: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used and are effective for the management of pain in cats. These Guidelines will support veterinarians in decision-making around prescribing NSAIDs in situations of chronic pain, to minimise adverse effects and optimise pain management. Information is provided on mechanism of action, indications for use, screening prior to prescription, use in the presence of comorbidities, monitoring of efficacy, and avoidance and management of adverse effects. CLINICAL CHALLENGES: The cat's unique metabolism should be considered when prescribing any medications, including NSAIDs. Chronic pain may be challenging to detect in this species and comorbidities, particularly chronic kidney disease, are common in senior cats. Management of chronic pain may be complicated by prescription of other drugs with the potential for interactions with NSAIDs. EVIDENCE BASE: These Guidelines have been created by a panel of experts brought together by the International Society of Feline Medicine (ISFM) and American Association of Feline Practitioners (AAFP). Information is based on the available literature, expert opinion and the panel members' experience.

Construct validity, responsiveness and reliability of the Feline Grimace Scale in kittens.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate the construct validity, responsiveness and reliability of the Feline Grimace Scale (FGS) in kittens. METHODS: A total of 36 healthy female kittens (aged 10 weeks to 6 months) were included in a prospective, randomized, blinded study. Video recordings of all kittens were made before and 1 and 2 h after ovariohysterectomy using an opioid-free injectable anesthetic protocol with or without multimodal analgesia. Additional recordings were taken before and 1 h after administration of rescue analgesia (buprenorphine 0.02 mg/kg IM) to painful kittens. Screenshots of facial images were collected from the video recordings for FGS scoring. Four observers blinded to treatment groups and time points scored 111 randomized images twice with a 5-week interval using the FGS. Five action units (AUs) were scored (ear position, orbital tightening, muzzle tension, whiskers position and head position; 0-2 each). Construct validity, responsiveness, and inter- and intra-rater reliability were evaluated using linear models with Benjamini-Hochberg correction, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and single intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCsingle), respectively (P <0.05). RESULTS: FGS total ratio scores were higher at 1 and 2 h after ovariohysterectomy (median [interquartile range, IQR]: 0.30 [0.20-0.40] and 0.30 [0.20-0.40], respectively) than at baseline (median [IQR]: 0.10 [0.00-0.30]) (P <0.001). FGS total ratio scores were lower after the administration of rescue analgesia (median [IQR] before and after rescue analgesia) 0.40 [0.20-0.50] and 0.20 [0.10-0.38], respectively (P <0.001). Inter-rater ICCsingle was 0.68 for the FGS total ratio scores and 0.35-0.70 for all AUs considered individually. Intra-rater ICCsingle was 0.77-0.91 for the FGS total ratio scores and 0.55-1.00 for all AUs considered individually. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The FGS is a valid and responsive acute pain-scoring instrument with moderate inter-rater reliability and good to excellent intra-rater reliability in kittens.

Randomised, prospective, blinded, clinical trial of opioid-free injectable anaesthesia with or without multimodal analgesia in kittens undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared an opioid-free injectable anaesthetic protocol with or without multimodal analgesia in kittens undergoing ovariohysterectomy. METHODS: In this prospective, randomised, blinded, clinical trial, 29 healthy kittens (mean ± SD weight 1.55 ± 0.46 kg; aged 10 weeks to 6 months) were included. Anaesthesia was performed with an intramuscular injection of ketamine (4 mg/kg), dexmedetomidine (40 µg/kg) and midazolam (0.25 mg/kg). In the multimodal group (MMG), cats (n = 14) received meloxicam (0.1 mg/kg SC) and intraperitoneal bupivacaine 0.25% (2 mg/kg), whereas the same volume of saline was administered in the control group (CG; n = 15). Atipamezole (0.4 mg/kg IM) was given 15 mins after ovariohysterectomy. Postoperative pain was assessed using the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional feline pain assessment scale - short form. Rescue analgesia (buprenorphine 0.02 mg/kg IM in MMG/CG and meloxicam 0.1 mg/kg SC in CG) was administered if pain scores were ⩾4/12. Soft food intake (after 2 and 60 mins) was evaluated at specific time points postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed with linear models and post-hoc pairwise comparison with Benjamini-Hochberg corrections (P <0.05). RESULTS: The prevalence of rescue analgesia was higher in the CG (n = 15/15) than the MMG (n = 1/14; P <0.001). Pain scores at 1 h, 2 h and 4 h postoperatively were higher in the CG (4.1 ± 2.8, 4.8 ± 3.0 and 5.3 ± 1.2, respectively) than in the MMG (1.6 ± 1.0, 1.1 ± 1.0 and 0.9 ± 0.8, respectively; P <0.001). Food intake (%) at 1 h postoperatively was higher in the MMG after 2 and 60 mins (10.4 ± 9 and 71.9 ± 29, respectively) than in the CG (1.4 ± 2 and 13.9 ± 7, respectively; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This opioid-free protocol using multimodal analgesia produced adequate postoperative pain relief, while almost eliminating the need for rescue analgesia in kittens undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Pain decreased food intake.

Analgesic efficacy of an ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block with bupivacaine in cats: a randomised, prospective, masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: This randomised, prospective, masked clinical trial evaluated the postoperative analgesic efficacy of an ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) with bupivacaine in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. METHODS: Thirty-two healthy adult female cats undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy were randomised to undergo TAPB with bupivacaine (treatment group [TG], n = 16) vs placebo (control group [CG], n = 16) in addition to preoperative analgesia with buprenorphine (0.02 mg/kg IM). All patients received a general anaesthetic and, before surgical incision, a bilateral two-point (subcostal and lateral-longitudinal) TAPB was performed using 1 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% (0.25 ml/kg/point) or saline. Each cat was assessed by a blinded investigator before premedication (0 h) and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 10 and 24 h postoperatively using the UNESP-Botucatu Feline Pain Scale - short form. Buprenorphine (0.02 mg/kg IV) and meloxicam (0.2 mg/kg SC) were administered when pain scores were ⩾4/12. Ten hours postoperatively, meloxicam was administered to cats that did not receive rescue analgesia. Statistical analysis included Student's t-tests, Wilcoxon tests and χ2 tests, and a linear mixed model with Bonferroni corrections (P <0.05). RESULTS: Of the 32 cats enrolled, three in the CG were excluded from the analysis. The prevalence of rescue analgesia was significantly higher in the CG (n = 13/13) than in the TG (n = 3/16; P <0.001). Only one cat in the CG required rescue analgesia twice. Pain scores were significantly higher in the CG compared with the TG at 2, 4 and 8 h postoperatively. Mean ± SD pain scores were significantly higher in the CG, but not in the TG, at 2 (2.1 ± 1.9), 3 (1.9 ± 1.6), 4 (3.0 ± 1.4) and 8 h postoperatively (4.7 ± 0.6) than at 0 h (0.1 ± 0.3). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A bilateral ultrasound-guided two-point TAPB with bupivacaine in combination with systemic buprenorphine provided superior postoperative analgesia than buprenorphine alone in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

Measurement properties of pain scoring instruments in farm animals: A systematic review using the COSMIN checklist.

This systematic review aimed to investigate the measurement properties of pain scoring instruments in farm animals. According to the PRISMA guidelines, a registered report protocol was previously published in this journal. Studies reporting the development and validation of acute and chronic pain scoring instruments based on behavioral and/or facial expressions of farm animals were searched. Data extraction and assessment were performed individually by two investigators using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Nine categories were assessed: two for scale development (general design requirements and development, and content validity and comprehensibility) and seven for measurement properties (internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, criterion and construct validity, responsiveness and cross-cultural validity). The overall strength of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low) of each instrument was scored based on methodological quality, number of studies and studies' findings. Twenty instruments for three species (bovine, ovine and swine) were included. There was considerable variability concerning their development and measurement properties. Three behavior-based instruments scored high for strength of evidence: UCAPS (Unesp-Botucatu Unidimensional Composite Pain Scale for assessing postoperative pain in cattle), USAPS (Unesp-Botucatu Sheep Acute Composite Pain Scale) and UPAPS (Unesp-Botucatu Pig Composite Acute Pain Scale). Four instruments scored moderate for strength of evidence: MPSS (Multidimensional Pain Scoring System for bovine), SPFES (Sheep Pain Facial Expression Scale), LGS (Lamb Grimace Scale) and PGS-B (Piglet Grimace Scale-B). Most instruments (n = 13) scored low or very low for final overall evidence. Construct validity was the most reported measurement property followed by criterion validity and reliability. Instruments with reported validation are urgently required for pain assessment of buffalos, goats, camelids and avian species.

Can cat caregivers reliably assess acute pain in cats using the Feline Grimace Scale? A large bilingual global survey.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate if cat caregivers could reliably assess acute pain using the Feline Grimace Scale (FGS), and if participant demographics could affect scores. METHODS: An online survey in English and Spanish was advertised by International Cat Care and other platforms (March-May 2021) using convenience sampling. Eligible participants were caregivers >18 years old and non-veterinary health professionals. Participants and a group of eight veterinarians scored 10 images of cats with different levels of pain. Data were analysed using linear models and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC; α <0.05). Interpretation of the ICC was <0.2 = poor; 0.21-0.4 = reasonable; 0.41-0.60 = moderate; 0.61-0.80 = good; and 0.81-1.0 = very good. RESULTS: A total of 3039 responses were received with 1262 completed answers from 66 countries (86%, 11.1% and 2.9% identified as female, male or other, respectively). Scores for each action unit (AU; ear position, orbital tightening, muzzle tension, whiskers change and head position) and their sum (FGS score) were not significantly different between caregivers and veterinarians, except for muzzle (caregivers 0.9 ± 0.0; veterinarians 0.7 ± 0.1; P = 0.035). The ICC single (caregivers) was 0.65, 0.69, 0.58, 0.37, 0.38 and 0.65, respectively, for AU ears, eyes, muzzle, whiskers, head and sum of scores. Demographic variables did not affect FGS scores. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Total FGS scores had good reliability when used by cat caregivers, regardless of demographic variables, showing the potential applicability of the instrument to improve feline pain management and welfare worldwide.

A randomized, prospective, masked clinical trial comparing an opioid-free vs. opioid-sparing anesthetic technique in adult cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of an injectable protocol using multimodal analgesia with or without opioids in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy (OVH). Thirty-two healthy cats were enrolled in a prospective, blinded, randomized trial after the caregiver's written consent. Cats received a combination of ketamine (4 mg/kg), midazolam (0.25 mg/kg) and dexmedetomidine (40 µg/kg), and either buprenorphine (20 µg/kg) or saline (same volume as buprenorphine) intramuscularly [opioid-sparing (OSA) and opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) groups, respectively]. Intraperitoneal bupivacaine 0.25% (2 mg/kg) and meloxicam (0.2 mg/kg subcutaneously) were administered before OVH. Atipamezole (400 µg/kg intramuscularly) was administered at the end of surgery. Pain and sedation were evaluated using the Feline Grimace Scale (FGS) and a dynamic interactive visual analog scale, respectively. Intravenous buprenorphine was administered as rescue analgesia if FGS scores ≥ 0.39/1. Statistical analysis included repeated measures linear mixed models, Fisher's exact test and Bonferroni adjustments when appropriate (p < 0.05). Twenty-seven cats were included. The prevalence of rescue analgesia was lower in OSA (n = 0/13) than in OFA (n = 5/14) (p = 0.04). The FGS scores (least square means and 95% CI) were higher in OFA at 1 [2.0 (1.3-2.7)] and 2 h [2.2 (1.5-2.9)] than baseline [0.7 (0.0-1.4)], but not in OSA. Sedation scores were not significantly different between groups. Opioid-free injectable anesthesia was appropriate for some cats using a multimodal approach. However, a single dose of intramuscular buprenorphine eliminated the need for rescue analgesia and assured adequate pain management after OVH in cats.

The Effects of Sedation with Dexmedetomidine-Butorphanol and Anesthesia with Propofol-Isoflurane on Feline Grimace Scale© Scores.

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of sedation and anesthesia on Feline Grimace Scale© (FGS) scores. Twelve healthy cats were included in a prospective, blinded and randomized, cross-over study with a 14 day wash-out. Saline or dexmedetomidine-butorphanol (Dex-But) was administered intramuscularly before an anesthetic induction with propofol and maintenance with isoflurane. Saline or atipamezole (Dex-But) was administered at the end of the general anesthesia. Video-filming/image capturing was performed before and up to 24 h post-anesthesia. A total of 125 images were evaluated by four raters blinded to the treatment groups using the FGS (ear position/orbital tightening/muzzle tension/whiskers change/head position; action units (AU); scores 0−2 for each AU). The effects of the sedation/anesthesia were analyzed (p < 0.05). The total FGS and each AU scores were significantly higher with Dex-But than with saline 20 min post-sedation. In the saline group, the total FGS, orbital tightening, and whiskers and head position scores were significantly higher than baseline at 0.5 h post-anesthesia. In the Dex-But group, the total FGS and each AU scores were significantly higher after sedation, whereas the orbital tightening scores were significantly higher at 0.5 h post-anesthesia when compared with the baseline. None of the other comparisons between or within the groups was significantly different. The sedation with dexmedetomidine-butorphanol and anesthesia with propofol-isoflurane changed the FGS scores on a short-term basis; consequently, they may bias acute pain assessment.

Guia de bolso sobre o agir ético da equipe de Enfermagem: produção baseada em evidências / Pocket guide on the ethical acting of the nursing team: evidence-based production / Guía de bolsillo sobre la acción ética del equipo de enfermería: producción basada en evidencia

Objetivo: Descrever a produção de um guia de bolso sobre o agir ético com vistas a reflexão sobre cuidados éticos, seguros e legais no exercício profissional para estudantes e equipe de enfermagem. Métodos: Estudo descritivo, do tipo relato de experiência, realizado com base na primeira etapa de uma pesquisa de desenvolvimento metodológico, etapa de produção, desenvolvida no período de agosto a dezembro de 2020. Resultados: Tendo como título "O agir ético da equipe de enfermagem: guia de bolso", o processo de produção do guia de bolso ocorreu em três etapas: revisão integrativa de literatura, identificação de temas geradores, produção da tecnologia educacional. A intenção é estimular nos leitores reflexões sobre infrações éticas e disciplinares no ambiente de trabalho do profissional de enfermagem, com ênfase nas ações de negligência, imperícia, imprudência, iatrogenia e exercício ilegal. Conclusão: A produção do guia responde ao desafio do agir ético e pode favorecer a prática baseada em valores para um exercício profissional seguro, com vistas a minimizar danos e fortalecer a pesquisa no campo da segurança e qualidade do cuidado ético em enfermagem. (AU)

Objective: Describe the production of a pocket guide on ethical actions with a view to reflection on ethical, safe and legal care in professional practice for students and nursing staff. Methods: A descriptive study, in the form of an experience report, carried out based on the first stage of a methodological development study, production stage, developed in the period from August to December, 2020. Results: Entitled "The ethical action of the nursing team: pocket guide", the process of producing the pocket guide took place in three stages: integrative literature review, identification of generating themes, production of educational technology. The intention is to stimulate in the readers reflections on ethical and disciplinary infractions in the working environment of the nursing professional, with emphasis on actions of negligence, impropriety, recklessness, iatrogeny and illegal exercise of the profession. Conclusion: The production of the guide responds to the challenge of ethical action and can favor value-based practice for a safe professional exercise, with a view to minimizing damage and strengthening research in the field of safety and quality of ethical care in nursing. (AU)

Objetivo: Describir la elaboración de una guía de bolsillo sobre acciones éticas con miras a la reflexión sobre el cuidado ético, seguro y legal en la práctica profesional para estudiantes y personal de enfermería. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo, en forma de relato de experiencia, realizado con base en la primera etapa de un estudio de desarrollo metodológico, etapa de producción, desarrollado en el período de agosto a diciembre de 2020. Resultados: Titulado "La acción ética de la equipo de enfermería: guía de bolsillo ", el proceso de elaboración de la guía de bolsillo se desarrolló en tres etapas: revisión integradora de la literatura, identificación de temas generadores, producción de tecnología educativa. La intención es estimular en los lectores reflexiones sobre las infracciones éticas y disciplinarias en el ámbito laboral del profesional de enfermería, con énfasis en las acciones de negligencia, deshonestidad, imprudencia, iatrogenia y ejercicio ilegal de la profesión. Conclusión: La elaboración de la guía responde al desafío de la acción ética y puede favorecer la práctica basada en valores para un ejercicio profesional seguro, con miras a minimizar el daño y fortalecer la investigación en el campo de la seguridad y calidad del cuidado ético en enfermería. (AU)

Pharmacokinetics of Bupivacaine Following Administration by an Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Cats Undergoing Ovariohysterectomy.

Bupivacaine is commonly used for peripheral nerve block in veterinary medicine. This study described the pharmacokinetics of two doses of bupivacaine following administration by an ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Twelve healthy female adult cats were included in a randomized, prospective, blinded clinical trial. Anaesthetic protocol included acepromazine-buprenorphine-propofol-isoflurane-meloxicam. Each cat received 1 mL/kg of bupivacaine 0.2% or 0.25% (BUPI-2 and BUPI-2.5, respectively) via bilateral two-point TAP block before surgery (n = 6/group). Plasma concentrations of bupivacaine were detected using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. A one-compartment model and non-compartmental analysis described the pharmacokinetic parameters. Bupivacaine was detected up to 480 min (335 ± 76 in BUPI-2 and 485 ± 198 ng/mL in BUPI-2.5). For BUPI-2 and BUPI-2.5, maximum plasma concentrations were 1166 ± 511 and 1810 ± 536 ng/mL at 33 ± 14 and 47 ± 22 min, clearance was 5.3 ± 1.8 and 4.9 ± 1.5 mL/min/kg, and elimination half-life were 253 ± 55 and 217 ± 52 min, respectively. The two doses of bupivacaine via TAP block produced concentrations below toxic levels in cats. A dose of 2.5 mg/kg bupivacaine was safe to be administered using this block in healthy cats.

Multilingual validation of the short form of the Unesp-Botucatu Feline Pain Scale (UFEPS-SF).

Background: Pain is the leading cause of animal suffering, hence the importance of validated tools to ensure its appropriate evaluation and treatment. We aimed to test the psychometric properties of the short form of the Unesp-Botucatu Feline Pain Scale (UFEPS-SF) in eight languages. Methods: The original scale was condensed from ten to four items. The content validation was performed by five specialists in veterinary anesthesia and analgesia. The English version of the scale was translated and back-translated into Chinese, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese and Spanish by fluent English and native speaker translators. Videos of the perioperative period of 30 cats submitted to ovariohysterectomy (preoperative, after surgery, after rescue analgesia and 24 h after surgery) were randomly evaluated twice (one-month interval) by one evaluator for each language unaware of the pain condition. After watching each video, the evaluators scored the unidimensional, UFEPS-SF and Glasgow composite multidimensional feline pain scales. Statistical analyses were carried out using R software for intra and interobserver reliability, principal component analysis, criteria concurrent and predictive validities, construct validity, item-total correlation, internal consistency, specificity, sensitivity, the definition of the intervention score for rescue analgesia and diagnostic uncertainty zone, according to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: UFEPS-SF intra- and inter-observer reliability were ≥0.92 and 0.84, respectively, for all observers. According to the principal component analysis, UFEPS-SF is a unidimensional scale. Concurrent criterion validity was confirmed by the high correlation between UFEPS-SF and all other scales (≥0.9). The total score and all items of UFEPS-SF increased after surgery (pain), decreased to baseline after analgesia and were intermediate at 24 h after surgery (moderate pain), confirming responsiveness and construct validity. Item total correlation of each item (0.68-0.83) confirmed that the items contributed homogeneously to the total score. Internal consistency was excellent (≥0.9) for all items. Both specificity (baseline) and sensitivity (after surgery) based on the Youden index was 99% (97-100%). The suggestive cut-off score for the administration of analgesia according to the ROC curve was ≥4 out of 12. The diagnostic uncertainty zone ranged from 3 to 4. The area under the curve of 0.99 indicated excellent discriminatory capacity of UFEPS-SF. Conclusions: The UFEPS-SF and its items, assessed by experienced evaluators, demonstrated very good repeatability and reproducibility, content, criterion and construct validities, item-total correlation, internal consistency, excellent sensitivity and specificity and a cut-off point indicating the need for rescue analgesia in Chinese, French, English, German, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese and Spanish.

Association between performance on the Glittre ADL-test and the functional capacity of patients with HF: A cross-sectional study.

Background: The Weber classification based on peak VO2 is a well-established method for categorizing patients with heart failure (HF) regarding severity. However, other submaximal tests such as the Glittre ADL-Test have been gaining prominence in practice due to a coherent and more comprehensive correlation with limitations for performing activities of daily living in patients with heart failure.Objective: To investigate the correlation between the time required to perform the Glittre ADL-Test and the peak VO2 in patients with HF.Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted with 40 adult individuals (21 to 65 years) diagnosed with HF of all etiologies, with LVEF<50% and NYHA II and III.Results: The average time for performing the Glittre ADL-Test was 284.9 seconds, and a significant difference was found between Weber classification classes A and C (p = .01). Significant correlations with peak VO2 were also found (r = -0.424 - p < .01). Thirty (30) patients performed a second test, and the ICC found in the reproducibility analysis was 0.75 (95% CI 0.14-0.91) and p < .01.Conclusion: The Glittre ADL-Test was able to reflect the functional performance of individuals with HF, suggesting that it represents an evaluation tool which can be safely used in clinical practice.

Measurement properties of grimace scales for pain assessment in nonhuman mammals: a systematic review.

ABSTRACT: Facial expressions of pain have been identified in several animal species. The aim of this systematic review was to provide evidence on the measurement properties of grimace scales for pain assessment. The protocol was registered (SyRF#21-November-2019), and the study is reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting the development, validation, and the assessment of measurement properties of grimace scales were included. Data extraction and assessment were performed by 2 investigators, following the COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement INstruments guidelines. Six categories of measurement properties were assessed: internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, criterion and construct validity, and responsiveness. Overall strength of evidence (high, moderate, and low) of each instrument was based on methodological quality, number of studies, and studies' findings. Twelve scales for 9 species were included (mice, rats, rabbits, horses, piglets, sheep or lamb, ferrets, cats, and donkeys). Considerable variability regarding their development and measurement properties was observed. The Mouse, Rat, Horse and Feline Grimace Scales exhibited high level of evidence. The Rabbit, Lamb, Piglet and Ferret Grimace Scales and Sheep Pain Facial Expression Scale exhibited moderate level of evidence. The Sheep Grimace Scale, EQUUS-FAP, and EQUUS-Donkey-FAP exhibited low level of evidence for measurement properties. Construct validity was the most reported measurement property. Reliability and other forms of validity have been understudied. This systematic review identified gaps in knowledge on the measurement properties of grimace scales. Further studies should focus on improving psychometric testing, instrument refinement, and the use of grimace scales for pain assessment in nonhuman mammals.

Measurement properties of pain scoring instruments in farm animals: A systematic review protocol using the COSMIN checklist.

Society has been increasingly concerned about the impact of pain on farm animal welfare. This systematic review aims to provide evidence relating to the measurement properties (i.e. reliability, validity, and sensitivity) of pain scoring instruments used for pain assessment in farm animals. A literature search will be performed using five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CAB abstracts and Biological Abstracts) and search terms related to pain, pain scales and different species of farm animals. Eligibility criteria will include full-text studies on the development and/or validation of acute and chronic pain scoring instruments for farm animals including bovine (beef and dairy), ovine, caprine, camel, swine and poultry. Exclusion criteria will include studies that report the use of pain scales for the validation of another instrument, or those reporting ethograms/list of behaviors potentially indicating pain without a scoring system. Study titles and their abstracts will be screened for eligibility by one investigator. Full-text articles will be independently reviewed for eligibility and evaluated by two investigators. Relevant information will be recorded and evaluated systematically according to the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist using an adapted data collection sheet. The following measurement properties and characteristics of the instruments will be assessed: content validity (internal consistency, structural and cross-cultural validity), reliability, measurement error, criterion and construct validity, responsiveness, interpretability and feasibility. Following the assessment of methodological quality and quality of the findings, evidence for each measurement property will be summarized into high, moderate, low or very low. This systematic review will provide further insights into the evidence-based measurement properties of pain scoring instruments in farm animals. It may identify possible gaps of knowledge with these tools as a potential target for future studies in farm animals with a positive impact on animal welfare.

The thermal antinociceptive effects of a high-concentration formulation of buprenorphine alone or followed by hydromorphone in conscious cats.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the thermal antinociceptive effects of a high-concentration formulation of buprenorphine alone or followed by hydromorphone in conscious cats. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study design. ANIMALS: A total of six purpose-bred, adult female ovariohysterectomized Domestic Short Hair cats. METHODS: Cats were allocated into three treatments each consisting of two injections, subcutaneous then intravenous (IV) administration, 2 hours apart: treatment SS, two injections of 0.9% saline; treatment BS, buprenorphine (0.24 mg kg-1, 1.8 mg mL-1) and saline; and treatment BH, buprenorphine (0.24 mg kg-1) and hydromorphone (0.1 mg kg-1). Skin temperature (ST) and thermal threshold (TT) were recorded before (baseline) and for 24 hours following first injection. TT data were analyzed using mixed linear models and a Benjamini-Hochberg sequential adjustment procedure (p < 0.05). RESULTS: There were no significant differences among treatments for baseline ST and TT values, treatment SS over time and between treatments BS and BH. Compared with baseline, TT was significantly increased at all time points in treatments BH and BS except at 2 hours in treatment BS. TT was significantly higher than SS at 3-18 hours and 4-12 hours for treatments BS and BH, respectively. Maximal increases in TT were 47.5 °C at 2 hours, 53.9 °C at 3 hours and 52.4 °C at 6 hours in treatments SS, BS and BH, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Administration of IV hydromorphone following high-concentration buprenorphine provided no additional antinociception and decreased the duration of effect when compared with high-concentration buprenorphine alone. Alternative analgesics should be considered if additional analgesia is required after administration of high-concentration buprenorphine.

Sistematização de arranjo institucional para a segurança e qualidade do manejo de cateteres venosos centrais / Systematization of institutional arrangements for the safety and quality of central venous catheter management

INTRODUÇÃO: A complexidade e relevância da terapia infusional venosa exige que as equipes de saúde tenham processos de cuidado seguros e de qualidade, especialmente aqueles que envolvem o manejo dos cateteres venosos centrais. OBJETIVO: Propor estratégias organizacionais para favorecer a segurança e a qualidade do manejo dos cateteres venosos centrais no cuidado a crianças cirúrgicas internadas em unidades especializadas. MÉTODO: Adotou-se a metodologia de pesquisa estratégica em saúde, no âmbito da gestão clínica, focando o processo de trabalho envolvido no manejo do cateter venoso central para a melhoria contínua do cuidado prestado. O cenário da pesquisa foi a Área de Atenção à Criança Cirúrgica do Instituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira. Primeira técnica de pesquisa: inquérito realizado com os profissionais desta área, através de plataforma de pesquisa digital, baseado nas medidas consideradas como padrão ouro para a prevenção da infecção da corrente sanguínea relacionada ao cateter venoso central. Segunda técnica: discussão acerca dos processos no manejo do cateter venoso central, em encontro com os gestores das UPs da Área de Atenção à Criança Cirúrgica para sistematização dos pontos críticos. RESULTADOS: Os achados do inquérito são consistentes e coerentes com os aspectos ressaltados pela liderança do serviço. Foi identificada variação das respostas entre as categorias, sendo o melhor desempenho dos enfermeiros e pediatras. Duas questões foram particularmente desafiadoras: uso da clorexidina no preparo da pele escolhida por 7% dos respondentes e somente 1 pediatra responde adequadamente a ordem de escolha para inserção. Os nós críticos levantados pela liderança foram: qualidade do material, uso mais adequado da clorexidina e protocolo de analgesia para inserção. CONCLUSÃO: A distância entre a literatura e a prática de cuidado ficou evidenciado pelo estudo e identificou-se recomendações para outros serviços, onde a reflexão persiste em apoiar os profissionais de serviços especializados na busca da efetividade clínica. Para isso, a prática precisa ser coerente, segura e sistematizada à luz da literatura para então otimizar a tecnologia disponível em cada serviço, alcançando a eficácia e respeitando a relação custo-benefício em cada realidade no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS).

INTRODUCTION: The complexity and relevance of venous infusion therapy requires that health teams have safe and quality care processes, especially those involving the management of central venous catheters. OBJECTIVE: To propose organizational strategies to promote safety and quality in the management of central venous catheters in the care of surgical children admitted to specialized units. METHOD: A strategic health research methodology was adopted, within the scope of clinical management, focusing on the work process involved in the management of the central venous catheter for the continuous improvement of the care provided. The research setting was the Surgical Child Care Area of the Fernandes Figueira National Institute of Women's, Children and Adolescents' Health. First research technique: a survey carried out with professionals in this area, through a digital research platform, based on measures considered as the gold standard for the prevention of bloodstream infection related to the central venous catheter. Second technique: discussion about the processes in the management of the central venous catheter, in a meeting with the managers of the UPs of the Surgical Child Care Area to systematize the critical points. RESULTS: The survey findings are consistent and coherent with the aspects highlighted by the service leadership. Variation of responses between categories was identified, with the best performance of nurses and pediatricians. Two questions were particularly challenging: use of chlorhexidine in skin preparation chosen by 7% of respondents and only 1 pediatrician adequately answered the order of choice for insertion. The critical points raised by the leadership were: material quality, more appropriate use of chlorhexidine and analgesia protocol for insertion. CONCLUSION: The distance between the literature and the practice of care was evidenced by the study and recommendations for other services were identified, where the reflection persists in supporting professionals from specialized services in the search for clinical effectiveness. For this, the practice needs to be coherent, safe and systematized in the light of the literature to then optimize the technology available in each service, achieving effectiveness and respecting the cost-benefit ratio in each reality in the Unified Health System (SUS).

Hipertensão na doença renal crônica em tratamento conservador / Hypertension in chronic kidney disease under conservative treatment

A hipertensão arterial sistêmica (HAS) afeta aproximadamente 30% da população geral no mundo industrializado e é uma das principais causas de doença renal crônica (DRC), caracterizada por função renal anormal ou danos estruturais renais com mais de 3 meses de duração. A sua presença classifica o paciente hipertenso como de alto risco cardiovascular (CV). O controle pressórico é fundamental para diminuir a sua progressão e reduzir o risco de morbidade e mortalidade CV. A meta pressórica recomendada deve ser menor que 130x80mmHg para a maioria dos pacientes com DRC. O tratamento não medicamentoso tem como base as mesmas recomendações dos demais pacientes hipertensos. A terapia medicamentosa combinada deve ser iniciada o mais breve possível. Além dos inibidores do sistema renina angiotensina aldosterona, conhecidos por sua eficácia na DRC, os diuréticos e os bloqueadores de canal de cálcio compõem o trio de ouro utilizado no tratamento da HAS, capazes de reduzir o risco cardiovascular e desacelerar a progressão da doença renal. Em conclusão, a DRC é um preditor de risco CV e a presença concomitante de HAS aumenta expressivamente esse risco. A utilização da estratégia terapêutica adequada para manter os níveis pressóricos dentro das metas é fundamental na atenuação da progressão da doença renal e do risco

Systemic arterial hypertension (SAH) affects approximately 30% of the general population in the industrialized world and is a major cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD), characterized by abnormal renal function or structural damage lasting more than 3 months. Its presence classifies the hypertensive as a high cardiovascular (CV) risk patient. Blood pressure (BP) control is essential for slowing the progression and for reducing the risk of CV morbidity and mortality in patients with CKD. BP target <130x80mmHg is recommended for most hypertensives with CKD. Non pharmacological treatment is based on the same recommendations for other hypertensive patients. Combination drug therapy should be started as soon as possible. In addition to the renin angiotensin aldosterone system blockers, known for their effectiveness in CKD, diuretics and calcium channel blockers compose the gold trio used in the treatment of SAH, able to reduce cardiovascular risk and to slow the progression of kidney disease. In conclusion, CKD is a predictor of CV risk and the concomitant presence of SAH significantly increases this risk. The use of an appropriate therapeutic strategy to maintain BP control is crucial to mitigate the progression of kidney disease and CV

Anesthetic effects of ketamine-medetomidine-hydromorphone in dogs during high-quality, high-volume surgical sterilization program under field conditions.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the anesthetic and adverse effects of an injectable anesthetic protocol in dogs as part of a high-volume sterilization program under field conditions in Belize. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, observational, field study. ANIMALS: A total of 23 female and eight male dogs (14.2 ± 7.7 kg; age ≥ 8 weeks). METHODS: Using a volume per kg-based dose chart, dogs were administered ketamine (4.5 mg kg-1), medetomidine (0.04 mg kg-1) and hydromorphone (0.09 mg kg-1) intramuscularly. After induction of anesthesia, an endotracheal tube was inserted and dogs were allowed spontaneous breathing in room air. Monitoring included peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate, rectal temperature and end-tidal carbon dioxide (Pe'CO2). Meloxicam (0.2 mg kg-1) was administered subcutaneously after surgery. Data were analyzed with linear models and chi-square tests (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Onset of lateral recumbency (3.4 ± 2 minutes) was rapid. Desaturation (SpO2 < 90%) was observed at least once in 64.5% of dogs and was more frequent in large dogs (p = 0.019). Hypercapnia (Pe'CO2 ≥ 50 mmHg; 6.7 kPa) was observed in 48.4% of dogs. MAP was 111 ± 19 mmHg, mean ± standard deviation. Hypertension (MAP ≥ 120 mmHg), bradycardia (HR ≤ 60 beats minute-1) and tachycardia (HR ≥ 140 beats minute-1) were observed in 45.2%, 16.1% and 3.3% of dogs, respectively. Hypotension and hypothermia were not observed. Sex was not significantly associated with any complication. Return of swallowing reflex and time to standing were 71 ± 23 and 152 ± 50 minutes after injection, respectively. Return of swallowing was significantly longer in large dogs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: At the doses used, ketamine-medetomidine-hydromorphone was effective in dogs for high-volume sterilization. In this field setting, adverse effects included hypoventilation, hypoxemia and prolonged recovery.

Anesthetic and analgesic effects of an opioid-free, injectable protocol in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy: A prospective, blinded, randomized clinical trial.

This study evaluated the effects of ketamine-dexmedetomidine-midazolam as part of an opioid-free, multimodal protocol in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. In a prospective, blinded, randomized clinical trial, cats received either 1 of 2 doses of ketamine [5 mg/kg body weight (BW), n = 10, K5 or 7 mg/kg BW, n = 13, K7] with midazolam (0.25 mg/kg BW) and dexmedetomidine (40 µg/kg BW) intramuscularly, intraperitoneal bupivacaine (2 mg/kg BW) and subcutaneous meloxicam (0.2 mg/kg BW) after surgery. Buprenorphine (0.02 mg/kg BW, intravenously) was administered if pain scores exceeded intervention scores with 2 pain scoring systems. Similar prevalence of rescue analgesia was observed (K5 = 6/10; K7 = 7/13) with significantly lower requirements in kittens (2/8) than adults (11/15). Tachypnea (K5 = 7/10 and K7 = 9/13) and desaturation (K5 = 3/10 and K7 = 4/13) were the 2 most common complications. Age influenced the prevalence of rescue analgesia. Most adult cats required opioids for postoperative pain relief.

Effets anesthésiants et analgésiques d'un protocole injectable sans opioïde chez des chats soumis à une ovario-hystérectomie : essai clinique prospectif, randomisé, à l'aveugle. Lors de la présente étude nous avons évalué les effets de la combinaison kétamine-dexmedetomidine-midazolam comme élément d'un protocole multimodal sans opioïde chez des chats soumis à une ovario-hystérectomie. Dans un essai clinique prospectif, randomisé, à l'aveugle, des chats reçurent une des deux doses de kétamine [5 mg/kg poids corporel (BW), n = 10, K5 ou 7 mg/kg BW, n = 13, K7] avec du midazolam (0,25 mg/kg BW) et du dexmedetomidine (40 µg/kg BW) par voie intramusculaire, de la bupivacaine par voie intrapéritonéale (2 mg/kg BW) et du meloxicam sous-cutané (0,2 mg/kg BW) après la chirurgie. De la buprenorphine (0,02 mg/kg BW, par voie intraveineuse) fut administrée si les pointages de douleur excédaient les pointages d'intervention avec deux systèmes de pointage de la douleur. Une prévalence similaire d'analgésie de secours fut observée (K5 = 6/10; K7 = 7/13) avec des demandes significativement moindres chez les chatons (2/8) que chez les adultes (11/15). De la tachypnée (K5 = 7/10 et K7 = 9/13) et de la désaturation (K5 = 3/10 et K7 = 4/13) étaient les deux complications les plus fréquentes. L'âge influençait la prévalence de l'analgésie de secours. La plupart des chats adultes ont requis des opioïdes pour soulager la douleur post-opératoire.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).

Inter-Rater Reliability of the Feline Grimace Scale in Cats Undergoing Dental Extractions.

This study aimed to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of the Feline Grimace Scale (FGS) in cats undergoing dental extractions and the effects of the caregiver's presence on the FGS scores. Twenty-four cats (6 ± 3.3 years old; 4.9 ± 1.7 kg) undergoing oral treatment were included in a prospective, blinded, randomized, clinical study. They underwent treatment under general anesthesia (acepromazine-hydromorphone-propofol-isoflurane-meloxicam-local anesthetic blocks) at day 1 and were discharged at day 6. Images of cat faces were captured from video recordings with or without the caregiver's presence at 6 h postoperatively (day 1), day 6, and before and after rescue analgesia. Images were randomized and independently evaluated by four raters using the FGS [five action units (AU): ear position, orbital tightening, muzzle tension, whiskers change, and head position; score 0-2 for each]. Inter-rater reliability and the effects of the caregiver's presence were analyzed with intraclass correlation coefficient [single measures (95% confidence interval)] and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, respectively (p < 0.05). A total of 91 images were scored. Total FGS scores showed good inter-rater reliability [0.84 (0.77-0.89)]. Reliability for each AU was: ears [0.68 (0.55-0.78)], orbital tightening [0.76 (0.65-0.84)], muzzle [0.56 (0.43-0.69)], whiskers [0.64 (0.50-0.76)], and head position [0.74 (0.63-0.82)]. The FGS scores were not different with [0.075 (0-0.325)] or without [0.088 (0-0.525)] the caregivers' presence (p = 0.12). The FGS is a reliable tool for pain assessment in cats undergoing dental extractions. The caregiver's presence did not affect FGS scores.