ABSTRACT
AIMS: To characterize a cohort of T1D patients and to compare diabetes control between patients using different regimen of insulin therapy and glucose monitoring. METHODS: Were included all T1D patients followed at the Pediatric Endocrinology Unit, between April 1st and June 30th, 2021. Several clinical and demographic variables were analyzed. RESULTS: Our sample included 208 patients, 56.7 % males, mean age of 12.7 ± 4.6 years. The median HbA1c was 7.3 %. Most patients, 78.8% were treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and 81.3 % used continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). CSII had a lower HbAc compared with multiple daily injections (MDI) users (7.1vs 8.1 %, p < 0.01). In the CSII group, those who used CGM had a lower HbAc (7.1 vs 7.5 %,p = 0.02). Analyzing the data of the ambulatory glucose report, the CSII users had a lower glucose management indicator, (7.2 % vs 7.6 %, p < 0.01), more time in range (58.0 % vs 52.4 %;p < 0.01) and less time above range > 250 mg/dL (12.4 % vs 20.5 %;p < 0.01) than MDI users. CONCLUSIONS: The median HbA1c was 7.3% very close to the recommended target. In Portugal, pediatric patients can access a CSII provided by the national health service and a CGM system due to an elevated reimbursement of their cost. This healthy policy allows us to achieve better goals without the risk of hypoglycemia.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Male , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Female , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Portugal , Glycated Hemoglobin , State Medicine , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Insulin/therapeutic use , Insulin Infusion Systems/adverse effectsSubject(s)
Hyperthyroidism , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Hyperthyroidism/genetics , Hyperthyroidism/therapy , Hyperthyroidism/congenital , MutationABSTRACT
AIM: To compare fetomaternal outcomes between GDM pregnant women with twin versus singleton pregnancies and then between women with GDM versus non-GDM twin pregnancies. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study including GDM pregnant women with both twin and singleton pregnancies followed in our tertiary center between 2011 and 2018. The fetomaternal characteristics of each group were compared. We then compared women with GDM twin pregnancy followed at our institution between 2011 and 2018 to non-GDM twin pregnant women giving childbirth in 2018. RESULTS: A total of 1127 GDM pregnant women were evaluated: 42 with twin pregnancy and 1085 with singleton pregnancy. Preeclampsia (14.3% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.001) and cesarean delivery (76.2% vs. 36.9%, p < 0.001) were more frequent among women with twin pregnancy. Neonatal morbidity was also more common among neonates delivered from twin pregnant women, including preterm labor (73.8% vs. 7.8%, p < 0.001), hypoglycemia (6% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.043), hyperbilirubinemia (33.3% vs. 9.0%, p < 0.001), RDS (28.6% vs. 2.7%, p < 0.001), admission in NICU (32.1% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.001) and SGA (19.0% vs. 11.0%, p = 0.001). Overall there were no significant differences in fetomaternal morbidity parameters between GDM (n = 42) versus non-GDM (n = 83) twin pregnancies, although SGA infants were more frequent in the latter group (33.9% vs. 19.0%, p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: In GDM pregnant women, twin pregnancy seems to be associated with an increased prevalence of neonatal morbidity when compared to singleton pregnancy. On the other hand, in twin pregnancy, diagnosis of GDM does not seem to be associated with poorer fetomaternal outcomes. GDM seems to be protective for the occurrence of SGA neonates in twin pregnancies.
