Intravascular lithotripsy for the treatment of peri-stent calcific lesions in saphenous vein grafts: A case series report.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a cornerstone treatment for coronary artery disease, with the use of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) being prevalent. However, SVGs are susceptible to high failure rates due to graft inflammation, intimal hyperplasia, and atherosclerosis, leading to a substantial number of patients requiring revascularization. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of SVGs poses unique challenges, including increased risk of distal embolization and perforation due to the grafts' structure and atherosclerotic nature. The role of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) in calcific SVG lesions has not been elucidated. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed four cases of patients treated with IVL for SVG stenosis at Leiden University Medical Centre between May 2019 and December 2023. Quantitative coronary analysis and intravascular ultrasound were utilized to assess procedural success and mid- to long-term clinical outcomes were reported as well. RESULTS: In all 4 cases, IVL was performed in stent (2 due to calcific in-stent neoatherosclerosis; 2 bail-out due to extrinsic stent calcification). No major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were reported during mid- to long-term follow-up. The procedure demonstrated effective calcium cracking, leading to optimal stent expansion and minimal residual stenosis with a low risk of procedural complications. CONCLUSIONS: IVL represents a promising approach for managing calcified peri-stent SVG lesions, showing potential for safe and effective revascularization with minimal complications. These findings suggest that IVL could be incorporated into the treatment paradigm for calcified peri-stent SVG stenosis, warranting further investigation in larger, prospective studies to validate its efficacy and safety.

Coronary calcified nodules versus nonnodular coronary calcifications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on severely calcified coronary lesions is challenging. Coronary calcified nodule (CN) refers to an eccentric and protruding coronary calcification associated with plaque vulnerability and adverse clinical events. This study aims to conduct an extensive review of CNs, focusing on its prognostic impact in comparison with nonnodular coronary calcification (N-CN). METHOD: A systematic literature review on PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases was conducted for relevant articles. Observational studies or randomized controlled trials comparing CNs and N-CNs were included. RESULTS: Five studies comparing CNs and N-CNs were pertinent for inclusion. The total number of individuals across these studies was 1456. There were no significant differences in the baseline demographic, clinical, and angiographic data between the CN and N-CN groups. Intracoronary imaging was always utilized. At follow-up, CNs were associated with significantly increased, target vessel revascularization [odds ratio (OR) 2.16; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.39-3.36, P-value < 0.01, I2 = 0%] and stent thrombosis (OR 9.29; 95% CI: 1.67-51.79, P-value = 0.01, I2 = 0%) compared with N-CN. A trend for greater cardiac death was also assessed in the CN group (OR 1.75; 95% CI: 0.98-3.13, P-value = 0.06, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: CN has a significantly negative impact on outcomes when compared with N-CN.

Angiographic and Clinical Profile of Patients With COVID-19 Referred for Coronary Angiography During SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak: Results From a Collaborative, European, Multicenter Registry.

Data regarding angiographic characteristics, clinical profile, and inhospital outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) referred for coronary angiography (CAG) are scarce. This is an observational study analyzing confirmed patients with COVID-19 referred for CAG from 10 European centers. We included 57 patients (mean age: 66 ± 15 years, 82% male) , of whom 18% had previous myocardial infarction (MI) and 29% had renal insufficiency and chronic pulmonary disease. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was the most frequent indication for CAG (58%). Coronavirus disease 2019 was confirmed after CAG in 86% and classified as mild in 49%, with 21% fully asymptomatic. A culprit lesion was identified in 79% and high thrombus burden in 42%; 7% had stent thrombosis. At 40 days follow-up, 16 (28%) patients experienced a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE): 12 deaths (92% noncardiac), 1 MI, 2 stent thrombosis, and 1 stroke. In an European multicenter registry, patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection referred for CAG during the first wave of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic presented mostly with STEMI and were predominantly males with comorbidities. Severity of COVID-19 was in general noncritical and 21% were asymptomatic at the time of CAG. Culprit coronary lesions with high thrombus burden were frequently identified, with a rate of stent thrombosis of 7%. The incidence of MACE at 40 days was high (28%), mostly due to noncardiac death.

Delayed Iatrogenic Left Ventricular Apex Perforation Sealed With an Amplatzer Septal Occluder Device Under Transthoracic Echocardiography Guidance.

High rates of spontaneous rupture and death have been described when the pseudoaneurysm is left untreated. Percutaneous closure has emerged as an alternative to surgery in patients with unacceptable surgical risk. In this case, transthoracic echocardiography allowed optimal characterization of the defect and successful procedure guidance, avoiding risks derived from more invasive intraprocedural imaging techniques.

[Pulmonary embolism response teams: what is the added value for patients with acute pulmonary embolism?] / Longembolie-interventieteams.

Adequate triaging of patients presenting with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is essential for appropriate treatment, especially for patients with severe PE. Optimal treatment for this latter group of patients includes pharmaco-mechanical reperfusion treatment for the minority of patients who present with haemodynamic instability, and standard anticoagulation and close monitoring on the ward for the intermediate-high risk patient. In the USA, pulmonary embolism response teams (PERT) have been introduced to coordinate triaging of these patients. We discuss the potential role of PERT teams in Dutch hospitals. The main advantage of PERT could be a uniform management strategy that is supported by a multidisciplinary team including all key specialists in the treatment of severe PE.

Accuracy and reproducibility of fast fractional flow reserve computation from invasive coronary angiography.

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with favourable outcome compared with revascularization based on angiographic stenosis severity alone. The feasibility of the new image-based quantitative flow ratio (QFR) assessed from 3D quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count using three different flow models has been reported recently. The aim of the current study was to assess the accuracy, and in particular, the reproducibility of these three QFR techniques when compared with invasive FFR. QFR was derived (1) from adenosine induced hyperaemic coronary angiography images (adenosine-flow QFR [aQFR]), (2) from non-hyperemic images (contrast-flow QFR [cQFR]) and (3) using a fixed empiric hyperaemic flow [fixed-flow QFR (fQFR)]. The three QFR values were calculated in 17 patients who prospectively underwent invasive FFR measurement in 20 vessels. Two independent observers performed the QFR analyses. Mean difference, standard deviation and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) between invasive FFR and aQFR, cQFR and fQFR for observer 1 were: 0.01 ± 0.04 (95% LOA: -0.07; 0.10), 0.01 ± 0.05 (95% LOA: -0.08; 0.10), 0.01 ± 0.04 (95% LOA: -0.06; 0.08) and for observer 2: 0.00 ± 0.03 (95% LOA: -0.06; 0.07), -0.01 ± 0.03 (95% LOA: -0.07; 0.05), 0.00 ± 0.03 (95% LOA: -0.06; 0.05). Values between the 2 observers were (to assess reproducibility) for aQFR: 0.01 ± 0.04 (95% LOA: -0.07; 0.09), for cQFR: 0.02 ± 0.04 (95% LOA: -0.06; 0.09) and for fQFR: 0.01 ± 0.05 (95% LOA: -0.07; 0.10). In a small number of patients we showed good accuracy of three QFR techniques (aQFR, cQFR and fQFR) to predict invasive FFR. Furthermore, good inter-observer agreement of the QFR values was observed between two independent observers.

Classical determinants of coronary artery disease as predictors of complexity of coronary lesions, assessed with the SYNTAX score.

BACKGROUND: We need new biomarkers that can predict cardiovascular disease to improve both diagnosis and therapeutic strategies. The CIRCULATING CELLS study was designed to study the role of several cellular mediators of atherosclerosis as biomarkers of coronary artery disease (CAD). An objective and reproducible method for the quantification of CAD extension is required to establish relationships with these potential biomarkers. We sought to analyse the correlation of the SYNTAX score with known CAD risk factors to test it as a valid marker of CAD extension. METHODS AND RESULTS: A subgroup of 279 patients (67.4% males) were included in our analysis. Main exclusion criteria were a history of previous percutaneous coronary intervention or surgical revascularisation that prevent an accurate assessment of the SS. Diabetes mellitus, smoking, renal insufficiency, body mass index and a history of CAD and myocardial infarction were all positively and strongly associated with a higher SYNTAX score after adjustment for the non-modifiable biological factors (age and sex). In the multivariate model, age and male sex, along with smoking and renal insufficiency, remain statistical significantly associated with the SYNTAX score. CONCLUSION: In a selected cohort of revascularisation-naive patients with CAD undergoing coronary angiography, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors such as advanced age, male sex, as well as smoking and renal failure were independently associated with CAD complexity assessed by the SYNTAX score. The SYNTAX score may be a valid marker of CAD extension to establish relationships with potential novel biomarkers of coronary atherosclerosis.